Relación entre variabilidad de la práctica y variabilidad en la ejecución del servicio plano en tenis

  1. Ruperto Menayo Antúnez
  2. Juan Pedro Fuentes García
  3. Francisco Javier Moreno Hernández
  4. Raúl Reina Vaíllo
  5. Juan Antonio García Herrero
European Journal of Human Movement

ISSN: 0214-0071

Year of publication: 2010

Issue: 25

Pages: 75-92

Type: Article

More publications in: European Journal of Human Movement


Cited by

  • Dialnet Metrics Cited by: 9 (10-06-2023)


  • Social Sciences: C


This study analyzes the relationship between the variability in the performance of the flat tennis service and its practice under variable conditions, taking as a starting point a predictive analysis of the instantaneous kinematic variables of the hand that holds the racket. Seventeen tennis players performed services under 8 practice conditions (rackets and balls were modified), and pre-test and post-test were carried out. The players performed 120 services with the instruction to hit the ball powerfully and maintaining maximum efficiency. Data showed that two variables related to the speed and the acceleration of the hand will predict efficacy at 57.7%: both the time variation coefficients until we reach the speed peak and the final acceleration of the hand in the Y axis. Significant differences were also obtained between some instantaneous kinematic variables measured in the pre-test and the practice series, and also negative and significant correlations between these variables and the efficacy of the services.

Bibliographic References

  • Balagué, N. y Torrents, C. (2004). Adaptación al entrenamiento: de los mecanismos de regulación y control a la auto-organización. Revista de Entrenamiento Deportivo, 20(3), 11-18.
  • Bartlett, R. M. (2008). Movement variability and its implications for sports scientists and practitioners: an overview. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching 1(3), 113-124.
  • Bartlett, R.M., Wheat, J.S. y Robins, M. (2007). Is movement variability important for sports biomechanics?. Sports Biomechanics, 6, 224-243.
  • Beckman, H. y Schölhorn, W. (2003). Differential learning in shot put. In W. Schöllhorn, C. Bohn, J.M. Jäger, H. Schaper y M. Alichmann (eds.), European workshop on movement science Mechanics and Physiology, Münster (alemania), 22-24 de mayo (libro de actas).
  • Bernstein, N. (1967). The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Nueva York: Pergamon Press.
  • Crespo, M. (2009). Tennis coaching in the Era of Dynamic Systems. Journal of Medicine and Science in Tennis, 14 (2), 20-25.
  • Davids, K., Button, C. y Bennett, S. (2008). Dynamics of Skill Acquisition: A Constraints-led Approach. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics.
  • Davids, K., Chow, J.Y. y Shuttleworth, R. (2005). A constraints-based framework for nonlinear pedagogy in physical education. Journal of Physical Education New Zealand, 38, 17- 29.
  • Delignières, D., Nourrit, D., Sioud, R., Leroyer, P., Zattara, M. y Micaleff, J.P. (1998). Preferred coordination modes in the first steps of the learning of a complex gymnastics skill. Human Movement Science, 17, 221-241.
  • Glass, L. y Mackey, M.C. (1988). From clocks to chaos: The rhythms of life. Princeton, New York: Princeton University Press.
  • Jaitner, T., Kretzschmar, D. y Hellstern, W. (2003). Changes of movement patterns and hurdle performance following traditional and differential hurdle training. In E. Müller, H. Schwameder, G. Zallinger, and V. Fastenbauer, (eds.), 8th Annual Congress of ECSS, Salzburg, 9-12 julio (libro de actas).
  • Jaitner, T. y Pfeiffer, M. (2003). Developing jumping strength based on systems dynamics principles. In W. Schölhorn, C. Bohn, J.M. Jäger, H. Schaper, and M. Alichmann, (eds.), European workshop on movement science Mechanics and Physiology, Colonia, 31 mayo-2 junio (libro de actas).
  • Kelso, J.A.S. y Ding, M. (1993). Fluctuations, intermittency, and controllable chaos in biological coordination. In K.M. Newell, and D.M. Corcos (eds.), Variability and Motor Control (291-316). Campaign IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Kudo, K. y Ohtsuki, T. (2008). Adaptative variability in skilled human movements. Information and Media Technologies, 3(2), 409-420.
  • Menayo, R. (2010). Análisis de la relación entre la consistencia en la ejecución del patrón motor del servicio en tenis, la precisión y su aprendizaje en condiciones de variabilidad. Tesis Doctoral. Cáceres: Servicio de Publicaciones. Universidad de Extremadura.
  • Miller, S.A. (2002). Variability in basketball shooting: practical implications. In Y. Hong, International Research in Sports Biomechanics (27-34). London: Routledge.
  • Nashner, L.M. y Mc Collum, G. (1985). The organization of postural movements: A formal basis and experimental synthesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 135-172.
  • Newell, K.M. y Corcos, D.M. (1993). Issues in variability and motor control. In K.M. Newell, and D.M. Corcos (eds.), Variability and Motor Control (1-12). Champaign IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Newell, K.M. y Slifkin, A.B. (1998). The nature of movement variability. In J.P. Piek (ed.), Motor Behaviour and Human Skill (143-160). Campaign IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Pérez, M.A., y Nussbaum, M.A. (2006). Posture and motion variability in non-repetitive manual materials handling tasks. Human Movement Science, 25(3), 409-421.
  • Rein, R. y Simon, C. (2003). Influence of technique variation training on technique variability in long distance running. In N. Balagué (ed.), Proceedings of the 1st Meeting of Complex Systems and Sports, Barcelona, 14-17 de mayo (libro de actas).
  • Riley, M.A. y Turvey, M. (2002). Variability and determinism in motor behaviour. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 64, 99-125.
  • Robins, M., Wheat, J., Irwin, G. y Bartlett, R. (2006). The effect of shooting distance on continuous coordination variability in basketball. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 20, 218-238.
  • Sabido, R., Caballero, C. y Moreno, F.J. (2009). Análisis de la variabilidad entre diferentes situaciones en el lanzamiento de tres puntos en baloncesto. RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, 17(5), 76-87.
  • Schölhorn, W., Röber, F., Jaitner, T., Hellstern, W. y Käubler, W. (2001). Discrete and continuous effects of traditional and differential sprint training. 6th Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Sciences Colonia, 24-28 de julio (libro de actas).
  • Scholz, J.P. y Schöner, G. (1999). The uncontrolled manifold concept: Identifying control variables for a functional task. Experimental Brain Research, 126, 289-306.
  • Scholz, J.P., Schöner, G. y Latash, M.L. (2000). Identifying the control structure of multi-joint coordination during pistol shooting. Experimental Brain Research, 135 (3), 382-404.
  • Schönherr, T. y Schölhorn, W. (2003). Differential learning in basketball. In W. Schölhorn, C. Bohn, J.M. Jäger, H. Schaper, and M. Alichmann (eds.), European workshop on move ment science, Mechanics, and Physiology, Müster (Alemania), 22-24 de mayo (libro de actas).
  • Van Emmerik, R.E.A. y van Wegen, E.E.H. (2000). On variability and stability in human movement. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 16, 394-406.
  • Wagner, H., Müller, E., Kösters, A., Von Tscharner, V. y Brunner, F. (2003). Optimization of complex movement patterns (handball throw) motor development and the variation of kinematic and EMG parameters. In E. Müller, H. Schwameder, G. Zallinger, and V. Fastenbauer (eds.), 8th Annual Congress of the ECSS, Salzburg, 9-12 de Julio (libro de actas).
  • Wallace, S. (1997). Dynamic Pattern Perspective of Rhythmic Movement: A Tutorial. In H.N. Zelaznik, (ed.), Advances in Motor Learning and Control (155-193). Illinois: Human Kinetics.
  • Zanone, P.G. y Kelso, J.A.S. (1992). Learning and transfer as dynamical paradigms for behavioral change. In G.E. Stelmach, and J. Requin (eds.), Tutorials in Motor Behaviour, II (563-582). Amsterdam: North-Holland.