Factor structure of the construct of adaptive behavior in children with and without intellectual disability

  1. Arias Martínez, Benito
  2. Verdugo Alonso, Miguel Ángel
  3. Navas Macho, Patricia
  4. Gómez Sánchez, Laura Elisabet 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
International journal of clinical and health psychology

ISSN: 1697-2600

Año de publicación: 2013

Volumen: 13

Número: 2

Páginas: 155-166

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/S1697-2600(13)70019-X DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: International journal of clinical and health psychology

Información de financiación

This project has been founded by the Ministry of Science and Innovation, MICINN (R&D Projects, 2009) (PSI2009-10953). It has been partially supported by a grant (EDU/894/2009) given to the Excellence Group of Research (GR197) by the Junta de Castilla y León (Spain).

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arias, B. (2008). Desarrollo de un ejemplo de análisis factorial confirmatorio con LISREL, AMOS y SAS. In M. A. Verdugo, M. Crespo, M. Badia,&B. Arias (Eds.), Metodología en la investigación sobre discapacidad. Introducción al uso de las ecuaciones estructurales (pp. 75-120). Salamanca: INICO.
  • Bandalos, D.,&Finney, J. S. (2001). Item parceling in structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides,&R. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 269-295). Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
  • Bandalos, D.L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodnessof-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 78-102.
  • Bandalos, D.L.,&Finney, S. J. (2010). Factor analysis: Exploratory and confirmatory. In G. R. Hancock,&R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer's guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 125-155). Florence, KY: Routledge Education.
  • Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modeling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815-824.
  • Bollen, K. A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 605-634.
  • Browne, M. W.,&Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen,&J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Bruininks, R. H., McGrew, K.,&Maruyama, G. (1988). Structure of adaptive behavior in samples with and without mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 93, 265-272.
  • Bruininks, R. H., Woodcock, R., Weatherman, R.,&Hill, B. K. (1996). Scales of Independent Behaviour-Revised. Park Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ditterline, J.,&Oakland, T. (2009). Relationships between adaptive behavior and impairment. In S. Goldstein,&J. Naglieri (Eds.), Assessing impairment: From theory to practice (pp. 31-48). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Flora, D. B.,&Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466-491.
  • Gómez, L. E., Verdugo, M. A., Arias, B.,&Crespo, M. (2010). Normas, sugerencias y recomendaciones para la publicación de artículos en ciencias sociales. Siglo Cero, 41, 38-58.
  • Gorostiaga, A., Balluerka, N., Aritzeta, A., Haranburu, M.,&Alonso-Arbiol, I. (2011). Measuring perceived emotional intelligence in adolescent population: Validation of the Short Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS-23). International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 11, 523-537.
  • Greenspan, S. (2006). Functional concepts in mental retardation: Finding the natural essence of an artificial category. Exceptionality, 14, 205-224.
  • Greenspan, S. (2012). How do we know when it's raining out? Why existing conceptions of intellectual disability are all (or mostly) wet. Psychology in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 4-8.
  • Hair, C., Ringle, C. M.,&Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 139-151.
  • Hall, R. J., Snell, A. F.,&Singer Foust, M. (1999). Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 233-256.
  • Harrison, P. L.,&Oakland, T. (2003). Adaptive behavior assessment system - Second Edition. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
  • Harrison, P. L.,&Raineri, G. (2008). Best practices in the assessment of adaptive behaviour. In A. Thomas,&J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (5th ed.) (pp. 605-616). Bethesda, MD: NASP Press.
  • Hartley, J. (2012). New ways of making academic articles easier to read. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 12, 143-160.
  • Holt, J. K. (2004, October). Item parceling in structural equation models for optimum solutions. Paper presented at the 2004
  • Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Columbus, OH. Hu, L.,&Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoffcriteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
  • Iacobucci, D. (2010). Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 90-98.
  • Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, A. R.,&Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 6-23.
  • Jöreskog, K. G.,&Sorbom, D. (2006). LISREL: Interactive LISREL: Technical support (Version 8.8) [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software.
  • Kearny, D. S.,&Healy, O. (2011). Investigating the relationship between challenging behavior, co-morbid psychopathology and social skills in adults with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities in Ireland. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 1556-1563.
  • Kenworthy, L., Case, L., Harms, M. B., Martin, A.,&Wallace, G. L. (2010). Adaptive behavior ratings correlate with symptomatology and IQ among individuals with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 416-423.
  • Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Lambert, N., Nihira, K.,&Leland, H. (1993). AAMR Adaptive Behavior Scales-School (ABS-S:2). Examiner's Manual (2th ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G.,&Widaman K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173.
  • Luckasson, R., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Buntix, W. H. E., Coulter, D. L., Craig, E. M., Reeve, A., Schalock, R. L., Snell, M. E., Spitalnik, D. M., Spreat, S.,&Tassé, M. J. (2002). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (10th ed.). Washington DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
  • Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149-174.
  • Matson, J. L., Rivett, T. T., Fodstad, J. C., Dempsey, T.,&Boisjoli, J. A. (2009). Examination of adaptive behavior differences in adults with autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 1317-1325.
  • Montero, D. (1993). Evaluación de la conducta adaptativa en personas con discapacidades. Adaptación y validación del ICAP. Bilbao: Mensajero.
  • Mueller, R. O.,&Hancock, J. R. (2008). Best practices in structural equation modeling. In J. W. Osborne (Ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 488-508). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Navas, P., Verdugo, M. A., Arias, B.,&Gómez, L.E. (2010). La conducta adaptativa en personas con discapacidad intelectual. Siglo Cero, 41, 28-48.
  • Navas, P., Verdugo, M.A., Arias, B.,&Gómez, L.E. (2012). Development of an instrument for diagnosing significant limitations in adaptive behavior in early childhood. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(5), 1551-1559.
  • Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M.,&Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 544-559.
  • Satorra, A.,&Bentler, P. M. (2010) Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75, 243-248.
  • Schalock, R. L. (1999). Adaptive behavior and its measurement: Implications for the field of mental retardation. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
  • Schalock, R. L., Borthwick-Duffy, S. A., Bradley, V., Buntix, W. H. E., Coulter, M. D., Craig, E. M., Gomez, S. C., Lachapelle, Y., Luckasson, R., Reeve, A., Shogren, K. A., Snell, M. E., Spreat, S., Tassé, M. J., Thompson, J. R., Verdugo, M. A., Wehmeyer, M. L.,&Yeager, M. H. (2010). Intellectual disability. Definition, classification and systems of supports (11th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
  • Sparrow, S., Cicchetti, D.,&Balla, D. (2005). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (Vineland-II). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  • Tassé, M. J. (2009). Adaptive behavior assessment and the diagnosis of mental retardation in capital cases. Applied Neuropsychology, 16, 114-123.
  • Tassé, M. J., Schalock, R. L., Balboni, G., Bersani, H., Duffy, S. A., De Valenzuela, J. S., Spreat, S., Thissen, D. M., Widaman, K. F.,&Zhang, D. (2012). The construct of adaptive behavior: Its conceptualization, measurement, and use in the field of intellectual disability. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117, 291-303.
  • Tassé, M. J., Schalock, R. L., Balboni, G., Bersani, H., Duffy, S. A., De Valenzuela, J. S., Spreat, S., Thissen, D. M., Widaman, K. F.,&Zhang, D. (in press). Diagnostic Adaptive Behavior Scale: User's Manual. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
  • Temperaal, D. T., Schim, S.,&Gijselaers, W. H. (2007). A structural equation model analyzing the relationship of student's attitudes toward statistics, prior reasoning abilities and course performance. Statistics Education Research Journal, 6, 78-102.
  • Verdugo, M. A. (2003). Análisis de la definición de discapacidad intelectual de la Asociación Americana sobre Retraso Mental de 2002. Siglo Cero, 34, 5-19.
  • Verdugo, M. A., Arias, B., Gómez, L. E.,&Schalock, R. L. (2010). Development of an objective instrument to assess quality of life in social services: Reliability and validity in Spain. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 10, 105-123.
  • Verdugo, M.A., Arias, B.,&Navas, P. (in press). Escala de Diagnóstico de Conducta Adaptativa. Madrid: TEA.
  • Wechsler, D. (2005). WISC-IV: Escala de Inteligencia de Wechsler para niños-IV. Madrid: TEA.
  • Widaman, K. F., Borthwick-Duffy, S. A.,&Little, T. D. (1991). The structure and development of adaptive behaviors. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 17, 1-54.
  • Widaman, K. F.,&McGrew, K. S. (1996). The structure of adaptive behavior. In J. W. Jacobson&J. S. Mulick (Eds.), Manual of diagnosis and professional practice in mental retardation (pp. 97-110). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.