A New Paradigm in the Field of Intellectual and Developmental DisabilitiesCharacteristics and Evaluation

Referencias bibliográficas

• Amor, A.M., Fernández, M., Verdugo, M.A., Aza, A., & Schalock, R.L. (2020). Shaping the faces of the prism: Rights, supports, and quality of life for enhancing inclusion and opportunities in students with intellectual disability. Disability & Society, 49(3), 5-33. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.3573
• Amor, A.M., Verdugo, M.A., Calvo, M. I., & Navas, P. (2018). Psychoeducational assessment of students with intellectual disability: Professional-action framework analysis. Psicothema, 30(1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2017.175
• Baker, A., Salisbury, B., & Collins, D. (2016). Changing service delivery systems: An example from Community Living British Columbia. In R.L. Schalock & K.D. Keith (Eds.), Cross-cultural quality of life: Enhancing the lives of people with intellectual disability (pp. 149-166). American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
• Bigby, C., Frawley, P., & Ramcharan, P. (2014). Conceptualizing Inclusive Research with People with Intellectual Disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12083
• Buntinx, W.H., Tu Tan, I., & Aldenkamp, A.P. (2018). Support values through the eyes of the patient: An exploratory study into long-term support for persons with refractory epilepsy. Epilepsy and Behavior, 82, 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.02.031
• Chacón-Moscoso, S., Anguera, M.T., Sanduvete-Chaves, S., Losada, J.L., Lozano-Lozano, J.A., & Portell, M. (2019). Methodological quality checklist for studies based on observational methodology (MQCOM). Psicothema, 31(4), 458-464. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.116
• Chen, H.T. (1990). Theory-driven evaluation. Sage.
• Claes, C., Vandenbussche, H., & Lombardi, M. (2016). Human rights and quality of life domains: Identifying cross-cultural indicators. In R.L. Schalock & K.D. Keith (Eds.), Crosscultural quality of life: Enhancing the lives of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (2nd Ed.) (pp. 167-174). American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
• Consortium on Quality of Life (2019). Towards a consensus document regarding the conceptualization, measurement, and application of the quality life concept. University of Gent.
• Cummins, R.A. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007027822521
• DeWitt, R. (2010). World views: An introduction to the history and philosophy of science. Willey-Blackwell.
• Felce, D. (1997). Defining and applying the concept of quality of life. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 41, 126-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.1997.tb00689.x
• García, E., O’Brien, P., & Darren, C. (2014). Involving people with intellectual disabilities within research teams: Lessons learned from an Irish experience. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 11(2), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12081
• Gómez, L.E., Arias. B., Verdugo, M.A., & Navas, P. (2012). An outcomesbased assessment of quality of life in social services. Social Indicators Research, 106, 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9794-9
• Gómez, L.E., Monsalve, A., Morán, L., Alcedo, M.A., Lombardi, M., & Schalock, R.L. (2020b). Measurable indicators of CRPD for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities within the framework of quality of life. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, Article 5123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145123
• Gómez, L.E., & Navas, P. (2021). Tratamientos psicológicos para personas con discapacidad intelectual y problemas de salud mental [Psychological treatments for people with intellectual disability and mental health problems ]. In Manual de tratamientos psicológicos. Pirámide.
• Gómez, L.E., Peña, E., Arias, B., & Verdugo, M.A. (2016). Impact of individual and organizational variables on quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 125(2), 649-664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0857-6
• Gómez, L.E., Schalock, R.L., & Verdugo, M.A. (2020a). The role of moderators and mediators in implementing and evaluating intellectual and developmental disabilities-related policies and practices. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 32, 375-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-019-097202-3.
• Gómez, L.E., & Verdugo, M.A. (2016). Outcomes evaluation. In R.L. Schalock & K.D. Keith (Eds.), Cross-cultural quality of life: Enhancing the lives of people with intellectual disability (2nd Ed.) (pp. 71-80). American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
• Gómez, L.E., Verdugo, M.A., Arias, B., & Arias, V.B. (2011). A comparison of alternative models of individual quality of life for social service recipients. Social Indicators Research, 101, 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9639-y
• Gómez, L.E., Verdugo, M.A., Arias, B., Navas, P., & Schalock, R.L. (2013). The development and use of provider profiles at the organization and systems level. Evaluation & Program Planning, 40, 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.05.001
• GRADE Working Group (2004). Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 328, Article 1490. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490
• Gullickson, A.M. (2020). The whole elephant: Defining evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 79, 100-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101787
• Harpur, P. (2012). Embracing the new disability rights paradigm: The importance of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Disability and Society, 27, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.631794
• Isaacs, B.J., Brown, I., Brown, R.I., Baum, N., Myserscough, T., Neikrug, A., Roth, D., Shearer, J., & Wang, M. (2007). The International Family Quality of Life Project: Goals and description of a Survey Tool. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 4, 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2007.00116.x
• Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd Ed.). University of Chicago Press.
• Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
• Lombardi, M., Chu, C., Claes, C., & Schalock, R.L. (2020). Towards an international definition of supports, systems of supports, and elements of systems of supports. Submitted for publication.
• Lombardi, M., Vandenbussche, H., Claes, C., Schalock, R.L., De Maeyer, J., & Vandevelde, S. (2019). The concept of quality of life as a framework for implementing the UNCRPD. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 16(3), 180-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12279.
• Mittler, P. (2015). The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Implementing a paradigm shift. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 12, 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12118
• Morán, L., Gómez, L.E., & Alcedo, M.A. (2019). Inclusión social y autodeterminación: los retos en la calidad de vida de los jóvenes con autismo y discapacidad intelectual [Social inclusion and self-determination: The challenges in the quality of life of youth with autism and intellectual disability]. Siglo Cero, 50(3), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.14201/scero20195032946
• Muñiz, J., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2019). Diez pasos para la construcción de un test [Ten steps for test development]. Psicothema, 31(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.291
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2102). The guidelines manual. https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg6/chapter/developingand-wording-guideline-recommendations
• Nussbaum, M.C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Belknap Press of Harvard University.
• Onken, S.J. (2018). Mental health consumer concept mapping of supported community. Evaluation and Program Planning, 71, 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.08.001
• Ozeki, S., Coryn, C.L.S., & Schroter, D.C. (2019). Evaluation logic in practice. Findings from two empirical investigations of American Evaluation Association members. Evaluation and Program Planning, 76, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101681
• Patton, M.Q. (2008). Essentials of Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Sage. Patton, M.Q. (2018). Principle-focused evaluation: the GUIDE. Guilford
• Press. Petry, K., Maes, B., & Vlaskamp, C. (2007). Operationalizing quality of life for people with profound multiple disabilities: A Delphi study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52, 34-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00882.x
• Qian, X., Larson, S.A., Ticha, R., & Stancliffe, R., & Pettingell, S.L. (2019). Active support training, staff assistance, and engagement of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the United States: Randomized controlled trial. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 124, 157-173. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-124.2.157
• Rdz-Navarro, K., & Yang-Wallentin, F. (2020). Specification issues in nonlinear SEM: The moderation that wasn’t. Psicothema, 32(1), 115- 121. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.235
• Schalock, R.L., Gómez, L.E., Verdugo, M.A., & Reinders, H.S. (2016). Moving us toward a theory of individual quality of life. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 121, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-121.1.1
• Schalock, R.L., Gómez, L.E., Verdugo, M.A., & Claes, C. (2017). Evidence and evidence-based practices: Are we there yet? Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 55, 112-119. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-55.2.112
• Schalock, R.L., & Keith, K.D. (Eds.) (2016). Cross-cultural quality of life: Enhancing the lives of people with intellectual disabilities. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
• Schalock, R.L., Luckasson, R., & Shogren, K.A. (2020a). Going beyond environment to context: Leveraging the power of context to produce change. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061885.
• Schalock, R.L., Luckasson, R., & Tassé, M.J. (2019). The contemporary view of intellectual and developmental disabilities. Implications for psychologists. Psicothema, 31, 223-228. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.119
• Schalock, R.L., Luckasson, R., & Tassé, M.J. (2020b). Ongoing transformation in the field of IDD: Taking action for future progress. Submitted for publication.
• Schalock, R.L., Luckasson, R., & Tassé, M.J. (2021). Intellectual disability: Definition, diagnosis, classification, and planning supports. AAIDD.
• Schalock, R.L., & Verdugo, M.A. (2013). The transformation of disabilities organizations. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 273- 286. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-51.4.273
• Schalock, R.L., & Verdugo, M.A. (2019). International developments influencing the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities. In K.A. Keith (Ed.), Cross-cultural psychology: Contemporary themes and perspectives (2nd Ed.) (pp. 309-323). Wiley-Blackwell.
• Schalock, R.L., Verdugo, M.A., & Gómez, L.E. (2011). Evidence-based practices in the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities: An international consensus approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34, 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.10.004
• Schalock, R.L., Verdugo, M.A., & Gómez, L.E. (2020c). The Quality of Life Supports Paradigm: Its description and application in the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities. Submitted for publication.
• Schalock, R.L., Verdugo, M.A., & van Loon, J. (2018). Understanding organization transformation in evaluation and program planning. Evaluation and Program Planning, 67, 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.11.003
• Shogren, K.A., Luckasson, R., & Schalock, R.L. (2020a). Using a multidimensional model to analyze context and enhance personal outcomes. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 58, 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-58.2.95
• Shogren, K.A., Luckasson, R., & Schalock, R.L. (2020b). Leveraging the power of context in disability policy development, implementation, and evaluation: Multiple applications to enhance personal outcomes. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. Advance on line publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207320923656
• Shogren, K.A., Schalock, R.L., & Luckasson, R. (2018). The use of a context-based change model to unfreeze the status quo and drive change to enhance personal outcomes of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 15, 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12233
• Shogren, K.A., Wehmeyer, M.L., Uyanik, H., & Heidrich, M. (2017). Development of the support decision making inventory system. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 220-233. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-55.6.432
• Stancliffe, R.J., Arnold, S.R.C., & Riches, V.C. (2016). The supports paradigm. In R.L. Schalock & K.D. Keith (Eds.), Cross-cultural quality of life: Enhancing the lives of people with intellectual disabilities (pp. 133-142). American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
• Summers, J.A., Poston, D., Turnbull, A., Marquis, J., Hoffman, L., Mannan, H., & Wang, M. (2005). Conceptualizing and measuring family quality of life. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 777-783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00751.x
• Thompson, J.R., Bradley, V.J., Buntinx, W., Schalock, R.L., Shogren, K.A., Snell, M.E, Wehmeyer, M.L., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Coulter, D.L., Craig, E.P.M., Gómez, S.C., Lachapelle, Y., Luckasson, R.A., Reeve, A., Spreat, S., Tassé, M.J., Verdugo, M.A., & Yeager, M.H. (2009). Conceptualizing supports and the support needs of people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-47.2.135
• Thompson, J.R., Schalock, R.L., Agosta, J., Teninty, L., & Fortune, J. (2014). How the supports paradigm is transforming the developmental disabilities service system. Inclusion, 2, 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-2.2.86
• United Nations (2006). United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disability. Author. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-therights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html
• Verdugo, M.A., Navas, P., Gómez, L.E., & Schalock, R.L. (2012). The concept of quality of life and its role in enhancing human rights in the field of intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 1036-1045. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012. 01585.x
• Verdugo, M.A., Schalock, R.L., & Gómez, L.E. (in press). 25 years of parallel paths of the paradigms of quality of life and supports: Coming to the end. Siglo Cero.
• Wasserman, D.L. (2010). Using a systems orientation and foundational theory to enhance theory-driven human service program evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33, 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.005
• Wehmeyer, M.L. (Ed.) (2013). The Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability. Oxford University Press.
• Weiss, C.H. (1997). Theory-based evaluation: Past, present, and future. New Directions for Evaluation, 76, 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1086