Far from Heart, Far from EyesEmpathy, Personal Identity, and Moral Recognition

  1. Mar Cabezas 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso

ISSN: 0719-4242

Year of publication: 2022

Issue: 19

Pages: 221-243

Type: Article

DOI: 10.22370/RHV2022ISS19PP221-243 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso


Cited by

  • Scopus Cited by: 0 (29-05-2023)
  • Dimensions Cited by: 0 (08-04-2023)

SCImago Journal Rank

(Indicator corresponding to the last year available on this portal, year 2021)
  • Year 2021
  • SJR Journal Impact: 0.119
  • Best Quartile: Q3
  • Area: Philosophy Quartile: Q3 Rank in area: 451/700


  • Social Sciences: D
  • Human Sciences: C

Scopus CiteScore

(Indicator corresponding to the last year available on this portal, year 2021)
  • Year 2021
  • CiteScore of the Journal : 0.2
  • Area: Philosophy Percentile: 38


(Data updated as of 08-04-2023)
  • Total citations: 0
  • Recent citations: 0


Do we empathize with the others because first we have recognized them as somehow equals, or do we recognize them as equals because first we have empathized with them? This article explores the relation between affective empathy, the moral recognition of the others, and personal identity. I defend that, to recognize others as valuable and act in line with this, one must be able to feel affective empathy for their situation, and, to do so, one has to 1) be curious about them to surpass indifference, and 2) feel that your identity is not threatened by recognizing the others. Otherwise, rationalizations and justifications of antisocial behaviors would arise. Thus, I focus on how the construction of the self plays a key role in prosocial behaviors and the activation of affective empathy, which has been overlooked by moral philosophy in the debate on empathy.  In order to do so, firstly, I explore cases where moral recognition is broken, secondly, I explore the dichotomic debate on the role of empathy for moral recognition and moral agency, and, thirdly, I try to enrich the debate by shifting the focus to the prerequisites to feel empathy, such as curiosity, a well-integrated self and healthy narcissism, addressing so how the construction of the self plays a key role in the possibility of empathizing with others and, therefore, in epistemic virtues and moral agency. As a result, I advocate the importance of psychological education for moral agency. 

Bibliographic References

  • Améry, Jean (2011). Más allá de la culpa y la expiación. Tentativas de superación de una víctima de la violencia. Valencia: Pre-textos.
  • Boyne, John (2006). The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas. Oxford: David Fickling Books. Doi: 62132588.
  • Cercas, Javier (2004). Soldiers of Salamis. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Doi: 46658419.
  • Cortina, Adela (2010). Neuroética: ¿Las bases cerebrales de una ética universal con relevancia política? Isegoría, 42:129-148. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2010.i42.687
  • Crockett, Molly et al. (2014). Harm to others outweighs harm to self in moral decision making. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 48 (111) :17320–17325. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408988111
  • Damasio, Antonio (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam.
  • Damasio, Antonio (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. London: Harvest.
  • Dawes, Robyn (2001). Everyday irrationality. How pseudo-scientists, lunatics, and the rest of us systematically fail to think rationally. Colorado: West View Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429500688
  • Dovidio, John et al. (2006). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Mahwah: Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315085241
  • Eisenberg, Nancy and Paul Miller (1987). The Relation of Empathy to Prosocial and Related Behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1): 91-119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91
  • Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle: Selected papers. Psychological Issues, 1: 1–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1960.11926165
  • Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
  • Goldie, Peter (2011). Anti-empathy. In Amy Coplan and Peter Goldie (eds.), Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives, pp. 302-317. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539956.003.0018
  • Greene, Joshua and Jonathan Haidt (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 16 (12): 517-523. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)02011-9
  • Hoffman, Martin (1990). Empathy and justice motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 14(2): 151-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991641
  • Ignatieff, Michael (1999). Human Rights: The midlife crisis. The New York review of books, 46(9): 58-62.
  • Kennett, Jeanette and Cordelia Fine (2007). Internalism and the evidence from psychopaths and “acquired sociopaths. In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development (Volume 3), pp. 173-190. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  • Klein, Melanie (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. Int J Psychoanal, 27:99–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1949.11925749
  • Kleist, Chad (2009). Huck Finn the inverse akratic: empathy and justice. Ethical Theory and moral Practice, 12: 257-266. Doi: 10.1007/s10677-008-9144-4
  • Kohut, Heinz (1959). Introspection, empathy and psychoanalysis: an examination of the relation between mode of observation and theory. In Paul Ornstein (ed.), The search for the self. Vol. I, pp. 205-232. New York: International Universities Press.
  • Kohut, Heinz (1971). The Analysis of the Self. New York: International Universities Press.
  • Latané, Bibb and John. M. Darley (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? New York: Appleton Century Crofts. Doi:103764.
  • Levine, Mark et al. (2005). Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31: 443-453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271651
  • Mahler, Margaret and M. Furer. (1968). On human symbiosis and the vicissitudes of individuation. New York: International University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1969.11926492
  • Maibom, Heidi L. (2017). Affective empathy. In Heidi. L. Maibom (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy, pp. 22-32. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315282015
  • Maibom, Heidi L. (2020). Empathy. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213477
  • Prinz, Jesse (2007). The emotional construction of morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Prinz, Jesse (2011a). Is empathy necessary for morality? In Amy Coplan and Peter Goldie (eds.), Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives, pp. 211-229. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539956.003.0014.
  • Prinz, Jesse. (2011b). Against Empathy. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 49: 214-33. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-6962.2011.00069.x
  • Schopenhauer, Arthur (2000). The world as Will and representation. Volume I and II. New York: Dover Publications.
  • Slote, Michael (2007). The Ethics of Care and Empathy. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203945735
  • Stueber, K. R. (2006). Rediscovering Empathy: Agency, Folk Psychology, and the Human Sciences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Stroud, Sarah and Christine Tappolet (eds.) (2007). Weakness of will and practical irrationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/0199257361.001.0001
  • de Tienda, Lydia (2019). The Role of the Emotions in Moral Neuroeducation. In Patrici Calvo and Javier Gracia-Calandín (eds.), Moral Neuroeducation for a Democratic and Pluralistic Society, pp. 61-75. Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22562-9_5
  • Todd, Andrew et al. (2015). Anxious and egocentric: how specific emotions influence perspective taking. Journal of experimental psychology, 44(2):374-91. doi: 10.1037/xge0000048
  • Tugendhat, Ernst (2000). Lecciones de ética. Barcelona: Gedisa.
  • Twain, Mark (1884). The adventures of Huckelberry Finn. London: Chatto & Windus
  • Unger, Peter (1996). Living high and letting die: Our illusion of innocence. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Vv. Aa. (2009). Avances en el estudio de la inteligencia emocional. I Congreso Internacional de Inteligencia Emocional. Santander: Fundación Marcelino Botín/Universidad de Málaga.
  • Volkan, Vamik (2013). Enemies on the Couch: A Psychopolitical Journey Through War and Peace. Durham: Pitchstone Publishing.
  • De Waal, Franz (2006). Primates and philosophers: How morality evolved. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Zaki, J., Weber, J., Bolger, N. and Ochsner, K. (2009). The neural bases of empathic accuracy. PNAS, 106: 11382-11387. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902666106