Future Trends in the Design Strategies and Technological Affordances of E-learning

  1. Gros, Begoña 1
  2. García-Peñalvo, Francisco J. 2
  1. 1 Universitat de Barcelona

    Universitat de Barcelona

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/021018s57

  2. 2 Universidad de Salamanca

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Learning, Design, and Technology

ISBN: 9783319174600 9783319174617

Year of publication: 2023

Pages: 345-367

Type: Book chapter

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17461-7_67 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

Sustainable development goals


E-learning has become an increasingly important learning and teaching mode in recent decades and has been recognized as an efficient and effective learning method. The rapidly rising number of Internet users with smartphones and tablets around the world has supported the spread of e-learning, not only in higher education and vocational training but also in primary and secondary schools.E-learning and traditional distance education approaches share the emphasis on “any time, any place” learning and the assumption that students are at a distance from the instructor. The design of the initial e-learning courses tended to replicate existing distance education practice based on content delivery. However, long textual lectures were clearly not suitable for the online environment. These early insights guided the development of e-learning (technical and pedagogical) and emphasized the need for communication and interaction.E-learning describes learning delivered fully online where technology mediates the learning process, teaching is delivered entirely via Internet, and students and instructors are not required to be available at the same time and place.E-learning practices are evolving with the mutual influence of technological e-learning platforms and pedagogical models. Today, the broad penetration and consolidation of e-learning needs to advance and open up to support new possibilities. Future e-learning should encompass the use of Internet technologies for both formal and informal learning by leveraging different services and applications.The purpose of this chapter is to provide a general analysis of the evolution and future trends in e-learning. The authors intend to summarize findings from contemporary research into e-learning in order to understand its current state and to identify the main challenges in the technological and pedagogical affordances of e-learning.

Bibliographic References

  • Adkins, B. A., Foth, M., Summerville, J. A., & Higgs, P. L. (2007). Ecologies of innovation: Symbolic aspects of cross-organizational linkages in the design sector in an Australian inner-city area. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(7), 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764206298317.
  • Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Delgado-Kloos, C., Parada, H. A., Muñoz-Organero, M., & Rodríguez-de-las-Heras, A. (2013). Analysing the impact of built-in and external social tools in a MOOC on educational technologies. In D. Hernández-Leo, T. Ley, R. Klamma, & A. Harrer (Eds.), Scaling up learning for sustained impact. 8th European conference, on technology enhanced learning, EC-TEL 2013, Paphos, Cyprus, September 17–21, 2013. Proceedings (Vol. 8095, pp. 5–18). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Anderson, T. (2008). Toward a theory of online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), Theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 45–74). Edmonton, AB: AU Press, Athabasca University.
  • Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 80–97.
  • Aubusson, P. (2002). An ecology of science education. Int J Sci Educ, 24(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110066511.
  • Andrews, T., & Tynan, B. (2012). Distance learners: Connected, mobile and resourceful individuals. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 565–579.
  • Baker, J. W. (2000). The ‘Classroom Flip’: Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. In J. A. Chambers (Ed.), Selected papers from the 11th international conference on college teaching and learning (pp. 9–17). Jacksonville, FL: Community College at Jacksonville.
  • Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human development, 49(4), 193–224.
  • Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. New York: Buck Institute for International Society for Technology in Education.
  • Berlanga, A. J., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2005). Learning technology specifications: Semantic objects for adaptive learning environments. International Journal of Learning Technology, 1(4), 458–472. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2005.007155.
  • Bo, D., Qinghua, Z., Jie, Y., Haifei, L., & Mu, Q. (2009). An E-learning ecosystem based on cloud computing infrastructure. In Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2009 (pp. 125–127). Riga: Latvia.
  • Borrás Gené, O., Martínez-Nuñez, M., & Fidalgo-Blanco, Á. (2016). New challenges for the motivation and learning in engineering education using gamification in MOOC. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(1B), 501–512.
  • Bozkurt, A., Kumtepe, E. G., Kumtepe, A. T., Aydın, İ. E., Bozkaya, M., & Aydın, C. H. (2015). Research trends in Turkish distance education: A content analysis of dissertations, 1986–2014. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 18(2), 1–21.
  • Brown, J. S. (2000). Growing up: Digital: How the web changes work, education, and the ways people learn. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 32(2), 11–20.
  • Casany, M. J., Alier, M., Mayol, E., Conde, M. Á., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2013). Mobile learning as an asset for development: Challenges and oportunities. In M. D. Lytras, D. Ruan, R. Tennyson, P. Ordoñez de Pablos, F. J. García-Peñalvo, & L. Rusu (Eds.), Information systems, E-learning, and knowledge management research. 4th World Summit on the Knowledge Society, WSKS 2011, Mykonos, Greece, September 21–23, 2011. Revised Selected Papers (Mykonos, Greece, 21–23 September 2011) (Vol. CCIS 278, pp. 244–250). Berlin/ Heidelberg: Springer .
  • Chang, E., & West, M. (2006). Digital ecosystems a next generation of the collaborative environment. In G. Kotsis, D. Taniar, E. Pardede, & I. K. Ibrahim (Eds.), Proceedings of iiWAS'2006 - The Eighth International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications Services, 4–6 December 2006, Yogyakarta, Indonesia (pp. 3–24): Austrian Computer Society.
  • Chatti, M. A., Jarke, M., & Specht, M. (2010). The 3P learning model. Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 74–85.
  • Chen, W., & Chang, E. (2007). Exploring a digital ecosystem conceptual model and its simulation prototype. In Proceedings of IEEE international symposium on industrial electronics, 2007 (ISIE 2007) (pp. 2933–2938). Spain: University of Vigo.
  • Clark, D. (2013). MOOCs: Taxonomy of 8 types of MOOC. Retrieved from http://donaldclarkplanb.blogspot.com.es/2013/04/moocs-taxonomy-of-8-types-of-mooc.html
  • Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (3rd ed.). San Francisco, USA: Pfeiffer.
  • Collis, B. (1996). Tele-learning in a digital world. The future of distance learning. London: International Thomson Computer Press.
  • Conde, M. Á., García-Peñalvo, F. J., Rodríguez-Conde, M. J., Alier, M., Casany, M. J., & Piguillem, J. (2014). An evolving learning management system for new educational environments using 2.0 tools. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(2), 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.745433.
  • Conde-González, M. Á., García-Peñalvo, F. J., Rodríguez-Conde, M. J., Alier, M., & García-Holgado, A. (2014). Perceived openness of learning management Systems by students and teachers in education and technology courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 517–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.023.
  • Conole, G. (2013). Digital identity and presence in the social milieu. Paper presented at the Pelicon conference, 2013, 10–12th April, Plymouth.
  • Conole, G. (2014). Learning design: A practical approach. London: Routledge.
  • Couros, A. (2010). Developing personal learning networks for open and social learning. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education (pp. 109–127). : Athabasca: Canadá Athabasca University Press/Edmonton.
  • Crouzier, T. (2015). Science Ecosystem 2.0: How will change occur? Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Dabbagh, N. (2005). Pedagogical models for E-Learning: A theory-based design framework. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 25–44.
  • Dabbagh, N. (2007). The online learner: Characteristics and pedagogical implications. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 217–226.
  • Daniel, J., Vázquez Cano, E., & Gisbert, M. (2015). The future of MOOCs: Adaptive learning or business model? RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(1), 64–73 https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2475.
  • Darabi, A., Liang, X., Suryavanshi, R., & Yurekli, H. (2013). Effectiveness of online discussion strategies: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(4), 228–241.
  • Dhungana, D., Groher, I., Schludermann, E., & Biffl, S. (2010). Software ecosystems vs. natural ecosystems: Learning from the ingenious mind of nature ECSA '10 Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on software architecture: Companion Volume (pp. 96–102). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Downes, S. (2005). E-learning 2.0. eLearn Magazine (October).
  • Downes, S. (2012). E-Learning generations. Retrieved from http://halfanhour.blogspot.be/2012/02/e-learning-generations.html
  • Downes, S. (2013). Week 2: The quality of massive open online courses. Retrieved from http://mooc.efquel.org/week-2-the-quality-of-massive-open-online-courses-by-stephen-downes/
  • European Commission. (2006). A network of digital business ecosystems for Europe: Roots, processes and perspectives. Brussels/Belgium: European Commission, DG Information Society and Media Introductory Paper.
  • Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Sein-Echaluce Lacleta, M. L. (2013). A methodology proposal for developing adaptive cMOOC. In F. J. García-Peñalvo (Ed.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’13) (pp. 553–558). New York: ACM.
  • Frow, P., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Hilton, T., Davidson, A., Payne, A., & Brozovic, D. (2014). Value propositions: A service ecosystems perspective. Marketing Theory, 14(3), 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593114534346.
  • Fulton, K. P. (2014). Time for learning: Top 10 reasons why flipping the classroom can change education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • García-Holgado, A., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2013). The evolution of the technological ecosystems: An architectural proposal to enhancing learning processes. In F. J. García-Peñalvo (Ed.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’13) (Salamanca, Spain, November 14–15, 2013) (pp. 565–571). New York: ACM.
  • García-Holgado, A., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2014). Knowledge management ecosystem based on drupal platform for promoting the Collaboration between public administrations. In F. J. García-Peñalvo (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’14) (Salamanca, Spain, October 1–3, 2014) (pp. 619–624). New York: ACM.
  • García-Holgado, A., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). Architectural pattern to improve the definition and implementation of eLearning ecosystems. Science of Computer Programming, 129, 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2016.03.010.
  • García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2005). Estado actual de los sistemas E-Learning. Education in the Knowledge Society, 6(2).
  • García-Peñalvo, F. J. (Ed.) (2008). Advances in E-learning: Experiences and methodologies. Hershey, PA, USA: Information Science Reference (formerly Idea Group Reference).
  • García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Alier, M. (2014). Learning management system: Evolving from silos to structures. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(2), 143–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.884790.
  • García-Peñalvo, F. J., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-EchaluceLacleta, M., & Conde-González, M. Á.(2016). Cooperative micro flip teaching. In P. Zaphiris & I. Ioannou (Eds.), Proccedings of the Learning and collaboration technologies. Third international conference, LCT 2016, held as part of HCI international (Toronto, ON, Canada, July 17–22, 2016) (pp. 14–24). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  • García-Peñalvo, F. J., García de Figuerola, C., & Merlo-Vega, J. A. (2010). Open knowledge: Challenges and facts. Online Information Review, 34(4), 520–539. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521011072963.
  • García-Peñalvo, F. J., Hernández-García, Á., Conde-González, M. Á., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce Lacleta, M. L., Alier-Forment, M., ... Iglesias-Pradas, S. (2015). Learning services-based technological ecosystems. In G. R. Alves & M. C. Felgueiras (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international conference on technological ecosystems for enhancing multiculturality (TEEM’15) (Porto, Portugal, October 7–9, 2015) (pp. 467–472). New York: ACM.
  • García-Peñalvo, F. J., Johnson, M., Ribeiro Alves, G., Minovic, M., & Conde-González, M. Á. (2014). Informal learning recognition through a cloud ecosystem. Future Generation Computer Systems, 32, 282–294 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.08.004.
  • García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Seoane-Pardo, A. M. (2015). Una revisión actualizada del concepto de eLearning. Décimo Aniversario. Education in the Knowledge Society, 16(1), 119–144 https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2015161119144.
  • Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2003). A theory of critical inquiry in online distance education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 113–127). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Gašević, D., Adesope, O., Joksimović, S., & Kovanović, V. (2015). Externally-facilitated regulation scaffolding and role assignment to develop cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 53–65.
  • Gómez-Aguilar, D. A., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Therón, R. (2014). Analítica Visual en eLearning. El Profesional de la Información, 23(3), 236–245.
  • Griffiths, D., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). Informal learning recognition and management. Computers in Human Behavior, 55A, 501–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.019.
  • Gros, B., Lara, P., García, I., Mas, X., López, J., Maniega, D., & Martínez, T. (2009). El modelo educativo de la UOC. Evolución y perspectivas (2nd ed.). Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.
  • Hanson, D., Maushak, N. J., Schlosser, C. A., Anderson, M. L., Sorensen, C., & Simonson, M. (1997). Distance education: Review of the literature (2nd ed.). Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
  • Hirsch, B., & Ng, J. W. P. (2011). Education beyond the cloud: Anytime-anywhere learning in a smart campus environment. In Proceedings of 2011 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST) (pp. 718–723). Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates: Conference on IEEE.
  • Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68–78.
  • Jansen, S., Finkelstein, A., & Brinkkemper, S. (2009). A sense of community: A research agenda for software ecosystems. In 31st International Conference on Software Engineering - Companion Volume (pp. 187–190). Vancouver/Canada: ICSE-Companion 2009.
  • Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43.
  • Lane, L. (2012). Three Kinds of MOOCs. Retrieved from http://lisahistory.net/wordpress/2012/08/three-kinds-of-moocs/.
  • Lee, J. J., & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother?. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2), 146.
  • Lerís López, D., Vea Muniesa, F., & Velamazán Gimeno, Á. (2015). Aprendizaje adaptativo en Moodle: Tres casos prácticos. Education in the Knowledge Society, 16(4), 138–157 https://doi.org/10.14201/eks201516138157.
  • Llorens, F. (2014). Campus virtuales: De gestores de contenidos a gestores de metodologías. RED, Revista de Educación a distancia, 42, 1–12.
  • Manikas, K., & Hansen, K. M. (2013). Software ecosystems – A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 86(5), 1294–1306 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2012.12.026.
  • Mayer, R. E. (2003). Elements of a science of e-learning. Journal of Educational Computing, 29(3), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.2190/YJLG-09F9-XKAX-753D.
  • McGreal, R., Kinuthia, W., & Marshall, S. (Eds.). (2013). Open educational resources: Innovation, research and practice. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning and Athabasca University.
  • Metcalfe, S., & Ramlogan, R. (2008). Innovation systems and the competitive process in developing economies. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 48(2), 433–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2006.12.021.
  • Minović, M., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Kearney, N. A. (2016). Gamification in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE), 32(1B), 308–309.
  • Morales, E. M., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Barrón, Á. (2007). Improving LO quality through instructional design based on an ontological model and metadata. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 13(7), 970–979. https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-013-07-0970.
  • Noesgaard, S. S., & Ørngreen, R. (2015). The effectiveness of e-learning: An explorative and integrative review of the definitions, methodologies and factors that promote e-learning effectiveness. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), 278–290.
  • Observatory of Educational Innovation of the Tecnológico de Monterrey. (2014). Flipped learning. Retrieved from Monterrey, México: http://observatorio.itesm.mx/edutrendsaprendizajeinvertido.
  • Papaioannou, T., Wield, D., & Chataway, J. (2009). Knowledge ecologies and ecosystems? An empirically grounded reflection on recent developments in innovation systems theory. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(2), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0832.
  • Pickett, S. T. A., & Cadenasso, M. L. (2002). The Ecosystem as a multidimensional concept: Meaning, model, and metaphor. Ecosystems, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0051-y.
  • Ramírez Montoya, M. S. (2015). Acceso abierto y su repercusión en la Sociedad del Conocimiento: Reflexiones de casos prácticos en Latinoamérica. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 16(1), 103–118 https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2015161103118.
  • Retalis, S., Papasalouros, A., Psaromiligkos, Y., Siscos, S., & Kargidis, T. (2006). Towardsnetworked learning analytics—A concept and a tool. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on networked learning (pp. 1–8). UK: Lancaster.
  • Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Sanchez i Peris, F. J. (2015). Gamificación. Education in the Knowledge Society, 16(2), 13–15.
  • Sánchez Prieto, J. C., Olmos Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2014). Understanding mobile learning: Devices, pedagogical implications and research lines. Education in the Knowledge Society, 15(1), 20–42.
  • SCOPEO. (2013). MOOC: Estado de la situación actual, posibilidades, retos y futuro. Retrieved from Salamanca, Spain: http://scopeo.usal.es/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/scopeoi002.pdf.
  • Sein-Echaluce Lacleta, M. L., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Conde-González, M. Á. (2016). iMOOC Platform: Adaptive MOOCs. In P. Zaphiris & I. Ioannou (Eds.), Proceedings of the learning and collaboration technologies. Third international conference, LCT 2016, held as part of HCI international 2016 (Toronto, ON, Canada, July 17–22, 2016) (pp. 380–390). Cham, Toronto, Canada: Springer International Publishing.
  • Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
  • Siemens, G. (2014). Digital Learning Research Network (dLRN). Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2014/11/18/digital-learning-research-network-dlrn/.
  • Sonwalkar, N. (2013). The First Adaptive MOOC: A case study on pedagogy framework and scalable cloud architecture—Part I. MOOCs Forum, 1(P), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1089/mooc.2013.0007.
  • Stöter, J., Bullen, M., Zawacki-Richter, O., & von Prümmer, C. (2014). From the back door into the mainstream: The characteristics of lifelong learners. In O. Zawacki-Richter & T. Anderson (Eds.), Online distance education: Towards a research agenda. Athabasca, Canada: Athabasca University Press.
  • Subashini, S., & Kavitha, V. (2011). A survey on security issues in service delivery models of cloud computing. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 34(1), 1–11.
  • Tan, E., & Loughlin, E. (2014). Using ‘Formally’ informal blogs to reate learning communities for students on a teaching and learning programme: Peer mentoring and reflective spaces. In F. J. García-Peñalvo & A. M. Seoane-Pardo (Eds.), Online tutor 2.0: Methodologies and case studies for successful learning (pp. 163–175). Hershey: IGI Global.
  • U.S. Department of Education - Office of Educational Technology. (2012). Enhancing teaching and learning through educational data mining and learning analytics: An issue brief. Retrieved from Washington, D.C.: https://tech.ed.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/edm-la-brief.pdf.
  • Wenger, E. C. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wiley, D. A. (2002). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects. Bloomington, Indiana: Agency for Instructional Technology.
  • Wilson, S., Liber, O., Johnson, M., Beauvoir, P., Sharples, P., & Milligan, C. (2007). Personal learning environments: Challenging the dominant design of educational systems. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 3(3), 27–38.
  • Yoshida, H. (2016). Perceived Usefulness of “Flipped Learning” on instructional design for elementary and secondary education: With focus on pre-service teacher education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(6), 430–434. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.727.
  • Yu, E., & Deng, S. (2011). Understanding software ecosystems: A strategic modeling approach. In S. Jansen, J. Bosch, P. Campbell, & F. Ahmed (Eds.), IWSECO-2011 Software Ecosystems 2011. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on software ecosystems. Brussels, Belgium, June 7th, 2011 (pp. 65–76). Aachen, Germany: CEUR Workshop Proceedings.