Uso de los blogs políticosanálisis de algunos factores determinantes

  1. De Marco, Stefano
  2. Robles, José Manuel
Revista:
Arbor: Ciencia, pensamiento y cultura

ISSN: 0210-1963

Año de publicación: 2012

Título del ejemplar: Prácticas políticas y nuevas tecnologías: Participación política digital en España

Número: 756

Páginas: 689-705

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3989/ARBOR.2012.756N4005 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Arbor: Ciencia, pensamiento y cultura

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anduiza, E.; Cantijoch, M.; Colombo, C.; Gallego, A. y Salcedo, J. (2010): “Los usos políticos de Internet en España”, Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 129(–1), 133-146.
  • Attewell, P. (2001): “Comment: The first and second digital divides”, Sociology of education, 74(3), 252-259.
  • Bar-Ilan, J. (2005): “Information hub blogs”, Journal of Information Science, 31(4), 297.
  • Best, S. y Krueger, B. (2005): “Analyzing the representativeness of Internet political participation”, Political Behavior, 27(2), 183-216.
  • Bimber, B. y Davis, R. (2003): Campaigning online: The Internet in US elections, Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Bimber, B. (2001): “Information and political engagement in America: The search for effects of information technology at the individual level”, Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 53.
  • Bonfadelli, H. (2002): “The Internet and knowledge gaps”, European Journal of communication, 17(1), 65.
  • Bruns, A. (2008): “Life beyond the public sphere: Towards a networked model for political deliberation”, Information Polity, 13(1), 71-85.
  • Cliff, N. (1988): “The eigenvalues-greaterthan-one rule and the reliability of components”, Psychological Bulletin, 103, 276-279.
  • Coleman, S. y Wright, S. (2008): “Political blogs and representative democracy”, Information Polity, 13(1), 1-6.
  • Coleman, S. (2004): “Connecting Parliament to the Public via the Internet”, Information, Communication & Society, 7(1), 1-22.
  • Coleman, S. (2005): “Blogs and the new politics of listening”, Political Quarterly, 76(2), 272-280.
  • Colombo, C. (2007): Innovación democrática y TIC ¿Hacia una democracia participativa?, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.
  • Cornfield, M. (2000): “A user’s guide to the digital divide”, Campaigns and Elections, 21(3), 47.
  • Dahlberg, L. (2001): “Democracy via cyberspace”, new media & society, 3(2), 157
  • De Zuniga, H. G.; Puig i Abril, E. y Rojas, H. (2009): “Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: an assessment of how the internet is changing the political environment”, New Media & Society, 11(4), 553.
  • De Zuñiga, H.; Veenstra, A.; Vraga, E.; Wang, M.; DeShano, C.; Perlmutter, D. y Shah, D. (2007): “Online and Offline Activism: Communication Mediation and Political Messaging Among Blog Readers”, Annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington, DC, 9-12.
  • DiMaggio, P.; Hargittai, E.; Neuman, W. y Robinson, J. (2001): “Social implications of the Internet”, Annual review of sociology, 27, 307-336.
  • Drezner, D. y Farrell, H. (2004): “Web of influence”, Foreign Policy, 32-41.
  • Dunham, R. (1999): “Across America, a troubling ‘digital divide’”, Business Week, 3640(2).
  • Eveland, W.; Hayes, A.; Shah, D. y Kwak, N. (2005): “Understanding the relationship between communication and political knowledge: A model comparison approach using panel data”, Political Communication, 22(4), 423-446.
  • Ferguson, R. y Griffiths, B. (2006): “Thin democracy? Parliamentarians, citizens and the influence of blogging on political engagement”, Parliamentary Affairs, 59(2), 366.
  • Gibson, R. y Ward, S. (2002): “Virtual campaigning: Australian parties and the impact of the Internet”, Australian Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 99-129.
  • Gibson, R.; Lusoli, W. y Ward, S. (2005): “Online Participation in the UK: Testing a ‘Contextualised’ Model of Internet Effects”, The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 7(4), 561-583.
  • Gillmor, D. (2004): We the Media, O’Reilly Media, Inc.
  • Hacker, K. y Van Dijk, J. (2001): Digital democracy: Issues of theory and practice, Sage Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
  • Hargittai, E. (2002): “Differences in people’s online skills”, First Monday, 7(4-1).
  • Harman, H. H. (1976): Modern factor analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hershey, M. y Hill, D. (1975): “Watergate and preadults’ attitudes toward the President”, American Journal of Political Science, 703-726.
  • Horrigan, J.; Garrett, K. y Resnick, P. (2004): The Internet and democratic debate, Pew Internet & American Life Project.
  • Hsu, C. y Lin, J. (2008): “Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation”, Information & Management, 45(1), 65-74.
  • Hwang, H.; Schmierbach, M.; Paek, H.; de Zúñiga, H. y Shah, D. (2006): “Media dissociation, Internet use, and antiwar political participation: A case study of political dissent and action against the war in Iraq”, Mass Communication and Society, 9(4), 461- 483.
  • Jackson, N. (2008): “‘Scattergun’ or ‘rifle’ approach to communication: MPs in the blogosphere”, Information Polity, 13(1), 57-69.
  • Johnson, T. y Kaye, B. (2004): “Wag the blog: How reliance on traditional media and the Internet influence credibility perceptions of weblogs among blog users”, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 622-642.
  • Johnson, T.; Kaye, B.; Bichard, S. y Wong, W. (2007): “Every blog has its day: Politically-interested Internet users’ perceptions of blog credibility”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 100-122.
  • Kahn, R. y Kellner, D. (2004): “New media and internet activism: from the ‘Battle of Seattle’ to blogging”, New Media & Society, 6(1), 87.
  • Kaid, L.; McKinney, M. y Tedesco, J. (2007): “Political information efficacy and young voters”, American Behavioral Scientist, 50(9), 1093-1111.
  • Krueger, B. (2002): “Assessing the potential of Internet political participation in the United States”, American Politics Research, 30(5), 476.
  • Lawley, D. N. y Maxwell, A. E. (1971): Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method, 2nd edition. London: Butterworth.
  • Lewis-Beck, M. (1994): Factor analysis and related techniques, Sage London.
  • Livingstone, S. y Helsper, E. (2007): “Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide”, New Media & Society, 9(4), 671.
  • Margolis, M. y Resnick, D. (2000): Politics as usual: the cyberspace “revolution”, Sage.
  • Miller, A. (1974): “Political issues and trust in government: 1964-1970”, The American Political Science Review, 68(3), 951-972.
  • Mossberger, K.; Tolbert, C. y Stansbury, M. (2003): Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide, Georgetown Univ Pr.
  • Mutz, D.; Martin, P. (2001): “Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media”, American Political Science Review, 95(1), 97-114.
  • Nardi, B.; Schiano, D. y Gumbrecht, M. (2004): “Blogging as social activity, or, would you let 900 million people read your diary?” “Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work”, ACM, 222-231.
  • Norris, P. (2001): Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide, Cambridge Univ Pr.
  • Norris, P. (2003): “Preaching to the Converted?”, Party Politics, 9(1), 21.
  • Robinson, J.; DiMaggio, P. y Hargittai, E. (2003): “New social survey perspectives on the digital divide”, It & Society, 1(5), 1-22.
  • Robles, J. (2008): Ciudadanía digital: una introducción a un nuevo concepto de ciudadano, Editorial UOC.
  • Schuefele, D. y Nisbet, M. (2002): “Being a Citizen Online: New Opportunities and Dead Ends”, The Harvard Journal of Press/Politics, 7(3), 55-75.
  • Shah, D.; Kwak, N. y Holbert, R. (2001): “‘Connecting’ and ‘disconnecting’ with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital”, Political Communication, 18(2), 141-162.
  • Singer, J. (2005): “The political j-blogger”, Journalism, 6(2), 173.
  • Subirats, J. (2002): “Los dilemas de una relación inevitable. Innovación demo- crática y tecnologías de la información y de la comunicación”, contenido en Cairo Carou, H. (Comp.), Democracia Digital. Límites y oportunidades, pp. 89-111, Madrid, Trotta.
  • Sweetser, K. y Lee Kaid, L. (2008): “Stealth soapboxes: political information efficacy, cynicism and uses of celebrity weblogs among readers”, New Media & Society, 10(1), 67.
  • Wallsten, K. (2008): “Political blogs: Transmission belts, soapboxes, mobilizers, or conversation starters?”, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 4(3), 19-40.
  • Warschauer, M. (2003): “Demystifying the digital divide”, Scientific American, 289(2), 34-39.
  • Wasserman, I. y Richmond-Abbott, M. (2005): “Gender and the Internet: Causes of Variation in Access, Level, and Scope of Use”, Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), 252-270.
  • Woodly, D. (2008): “New competencies in democratic communication? Blogs, agenda setting and political participation”, Public Choice, 134(1), 109-123.
  • Wright, S. (2008): “Read My Day? Communication, campaigning and councillors’ blogs”, Information Polity, 13(1), 41-55.
  • Xenos, M. (2008): “New mediated deliberation: Blog and press coverage of the Alito nomination”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(2), 485-503.