El efecto de la organización de la práctica en el aprendizaje de las habilidades motrices y deportivas

  1. Luis del Campo, Vicente
  2. García Herrero, Juan Antonio
  3. Moreno Hernández, Francisco Javier
Revista:
Habilidad Motriz: revista de ciencias de la actividad física y del deporte

ISSN: 1132-2462

Año de publicación: 2004

Número: 22

Páginas: 37-44

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Habilidad Motriz: revista de ciencias de la actividad física y del deporte

Resumen

En el presente trabajo se analizan las principales variables que afectan a la organización de la práctica y al efecto que ésta provoca sobre el rendimiento (interferencia contextual). Los antecedentes que existen derivados de investigaciones sobre el efecto de la organización de la práctica, sugieren que la práctica en bloque permite alcanzar mejores cotas de rendimiento al finalizar el periodo de adquisición, mientras que la práctica aleatoria provocaría mejores niveles de rendimiento en posteriores tests de retención. Igualmente, parece que la práctica en aleatoria facilitaría la transferencia a tareas de estructura similar, aunque las investigaciones que han contrastado diferentes variables (naturaleza y estructura de las tareas, edad de los sujetos, etc) no ofrecen unos resultados concluyentes.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ADAMS, J. (1971) A closedloop theory of motor learning. Journal of motor behavior, 3, 111-149.
  • ANDERSON, J. R. (1980) Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
  • BARREIROS, J. (1992) Aprendizagem Motora. Variabilidade das Condiçoes de Práctica. Lisboa EM. H.
  • BATTIG, W. E (1966) Facilitation and interference. En E. A. Bilodeau (Ed.) Acquisition Of skill, 215-244. New York. Academic Press.
  • BATTIG, W. F. (1979) The flexibility of human memory. En L. S. Cermak e F.I.M. Craik (Eds.) Levels of processing and human memory, 23-44. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
  • DEL REY, P. (1982) Effects of contextual interference on the memory of older females differing in levels Of physical activity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 171-180.
  • DEL REY, p. (1989) Training and contextual interference effects on memory and transfer. Research Quarterly for Exercise and sport, 60, 342-347.
  • DEL REY, P.; WUGHALTER, E; DUBOIS, D. Y CAR. NES, M. (1982) Effects of contextual interference and retention intervals on transfer. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 54, 467-476.
  • FIGUEIREDO, T. (1994) Interferência contextual: revisao de estudos e situaçao actual do problema. En Barreiros, J. (Ed.) O Efeito de Interferência Contextual, 1-31. Lisboa. F.M.H.
  • GENTILE, A. M. (1972) A working model of skill acquisition with application to teaching. Quest, WII, 323.
  • GENTILE, M. (1987) Skill acquisition: action, movement, and neuromotor processes. En H. Carr, B. Shepherd; J. Cordon; A. M. Genti e y J. M. Held (Eds.): Movement science foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation (93-154). Aspen. MD.
  • GREEN, S. G. Y SHERWOOD, D. E. (1999) Movement time, practice structure, and temporal error detection capability in quick reversal movements. Journal ofSpon and Exercise Psychology, 21 , S-51.
  • IMMINK, M. A. Y WRIGHT, D. (1999) Contextual interference: motor response programming under random and blocked practice. Journal of Spotl and Exercise Psychology, 21, S-60.
  • JARUS, T. Y GOVE-ROVER, Y. (1999) Effects Of contextual interference and age on acquisition, retention, and transfer of motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 437-447.
  • LANDIN, D. Y HEBERT, E. p. (1995) Practicing basketball shooting under high, moderate and low levels of contextual interference. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66 (suplemento) A-64.
  • LANDIN, D. Y HEBERT, E. (1997) A comparasion of three practice schedules along the contextual interference continuum. Research Quarterly for Exercise and sport, 6B, 357-361.
  • LEE, T. D. Y MAGILL, R. A. (1983) The locus of contextual interference in motor skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, memory and cognition, 9,
  • LEE, T. D.; MAGILL, R. A. Y WEEKS, D. J. (1985) Influence of practice schedule on testing schema theory predictions in adults. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 283-299.
  • Ll, Y. YVACZI, M. (1999) The locus of contextual interference effect: motoric or perceptual? Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 21, S-76.
  • MELTON, A. (1967) Repetition and retrieval from memory. Science, 158, 532.
  • OÑA, A; MARTINEZ, M., MORENO, Y RUIZ. L. M. (1999) Control y Aprondizaje Motor. Madrid. Sintesis.
  • PETERSON. L M. Y PETERSON, M. J. (1960) The effect Of repetitions on short-term retention. American Psychology, 15.450.
  • PIGOTT. R. E. Y SHAPIRO, D. C. (1984) Motor schema: The structure of the variability session. Research Quarterly for Exerceseand Sport, 55, 1, 41-45.
  • POLLOCK, B. J. Y LEE, T. D. (1997) Dissociated contextual interference effects in children and adults. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 851-85B.
  • POULTON, E. C. (1957) on prediction in skilled movements. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 467-478.
  • RUIZ, L. M. (1994) Deporte y Aprendizaje. Madrid. Visor.
  • RUIZ, L. M. (1995) Competencia Motriz. Elementos para comprender el aprendizaje motor en educación física escolar. Madrid. Gymnos.
  • SHEA, J. B. Y MORGAN, R. L. (1979) Contextual interference effects on the acquisition retention and transfer of a motor skill Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 178187.
  • SHEA, J. B. Y ZIMNY, S. T. (1983) Context effects in memory and learning movement information. En R. A. Magill (Ed.) Memory and Control of Action. Amsterdam , North Holland.
  • SHEA, J. B. Y ZIMNY, S. T. (1988) Knowledge incorporation in motor representation. En O. G. Meijer y K. Roth (Eds.) Complex Movement Behavior. The motor-action controversy, 289-314. Amsterdam, North-Holland.
  • SHEWOKIS, P. A. Y KLOPF D. (2000) Some blocked practice schedules yield better learning than random practice schedules with anticipation timing tasks. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 38, 57-73.
  • SMITH, p. J. K. Y PENN, G. L. (1999) The effect of number of practice trials on the contextual interference effect for skill variations with similar relative timing
  • WEGMAN, E. (1999) Contextual Interference effects on the acquisition and retention of fundamental motor skills. Perceptua/ and Motor Skills, 88, 182-187.
  • WRIGHT, D. L. (1991) The role of intertask and intratask processing in acquisition and retention of motor skills. Journai OfMOtor Behavior, 23, 2, 139-145.
  • WRIGHT, D. L; JOHNSON, J., IMMINK, M., Y SHEA, C.H. (1998) The emergence of invariant relative timing as a function of the extent of contextual interference during practice. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20, S-27.
  • WRIGHT, D. u; MAGNUSSEN, C., IMMINK, M., Y FREY, M. (1999) Spacing and the repetition effect: Influence of contextual interference. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 21, S-123.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet