El entrenamiento de los policías para detectar mentiras

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aamodt, M. G. y Custer, H. (2006). Who can best catch a liar? A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. Forensic Examiner, 15, 6-11
• Alonso, H. (2009). Los policías como detectores del engaño: Investigación en torno al efecto del sesgo del investigador. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Salamanca.
• Alonso, H., Masip, J. y Garrido, E. (2009). La capacidad de los policías para detectar mentiras. Revista de Derecho Penal y Criminología, 3ª Época, 2
• Blair, J. P. y Kooi, B. (2004). The gap between training and research in the detection of deception. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 6
• Blair, J. P. y McCamey, W. P. (2002). Detection of deception: An analysis of the Behavioral Analysis Interview technique. Illinois Law Enforcement Executive Forum, 2
• Bond, C. F. y DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214-234.
• Botella, J. y Gambara, H. (2002). Qué es el meta-análisis. Madrid, España: Biblioteca Nueva.
• Botella, J. y Gambara, H. (2006). El meta-análisis: Una metodología de nuestro tiempo. Infocop Online.
• Bull, R. (1989). Can training enhance the detection of deception? En J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment. Dordrecht, Holanda: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Bull, R. (1999). Police investigative interviewing. En A. Memon, y R. Bull (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of interviewing. Chichester, Reino Unido: Wiley.
• Bull, R. (2004). Training to detect deception from behavioural cues: Attempts and problems. En P. A. Granhag y L. A. Strömwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts, Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Edición revisada). Hillsdale, NJ, Estados Unidos: Erlbaum.
• Colwell, L. H., Miller, H. A., Miller, R. S. y Lyons, P. M. (2006). US police officers’ knowledge regarding behaviors indicative of deception: Implications for eradicating erroneous beliefs through training. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 12
• Colwell, L., Miller, H. A., Lyons, P. M. y Miller, R. S. (2006). The training of law enforcement officers in detecting deception: A survey of current practices and suggestions for improving accuracy. Police Quarterly, 9
• DePaulo, B. M. (1991). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation: A developmental perspective. En R. S. Feldman y B. Rimé (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.
• DePaulo, B. M. (1992). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 203–243.
• DePaulo, B. M., Charlton, K., Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J. y Muhlenbruck, L. (1997). The accuracy-confidence correlation in the detection of deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(4)
• DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K. y Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129
• División de Formación y Perfeccionamiento de la Dirección General de la Policía (2006). Diseño curricular para la formación de la Escala Ejecutiva del Cuerpo Nacional de Policía y Plan de Estudios 2006. Ávila, España: Centro de Formación de la Policía Nacional.
• División de Formación y Perfeccionamiento de la Dirección General de la Policía (2000). Plan de estudios 2000, Escala Ejecutiva. Ávila, España: Centro de Formación de la Policía Nacional.
• Ekman, P. (2001). Telling lies. Cues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: W. W. Norton.
• Fisher, R. P. y Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfiled, IL, Estados Unidos: Charles C. Thomas.
• Frank, M. G. y Feeley, T. H. (2003). To catch a liar: Challenges for research in lie detection training. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31
• Garrido, E., Masip, J. y Herrero, C. (2004). Police officers’ credibility judgments: Accuracy and estimated ability. International Journal of Psychology, 39
• Garrido, E., Masip, J., Herrero, C. y Rojas, M. (2000). La detección del engaño a partir de claves conductuales por agentes de policía. En A. Ovejero, M. de la Villa y P. Vivas (Eds.), Aplicaciones en psicología social. Madrid, España: Biblioteca Nueva.
• Global Deception Research Team (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37
• Granhag, P. A. y Hartwig, M. (2008). A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 14
• Granhag, P. A. y Strömwall, L. (Eds.), (2004). Deception detection in forensic contexts. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.
• Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. y Hartwig, M. (2008). The SUE technique: The way to interview to detect deception. Forensic Update, 88
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions. Chichester, Reino Unido: Wiley.
• Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A. y Kronkvist, O. (2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: When training to detect deception works. Law and Human Behavior, 30
• Horvath, F., Jayne, B. y Buckley, J. (1994). Differentiation of truthful and deceptive criminal suspects in Behavior Analysis Interviews. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 39
• Iacono, W. G. y Lykken, D. T. (1997). The validity of the lie detector: Two surveys of scientific opinion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82
• Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P. y Jayne, B. C. (2004). Criminal interrogation and confessions (4ª ed.). Sudbury, MA, Estados Unidos: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
• Kalbfleisch, P. J. (1985). Accuracy in deception detection: A quantitative review. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45
• Kassin, S. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions. Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60
• Kassin, S. M. (2008). Confession evidence: Commonsense myths and misconceptions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1309-1322.
• Kassin, S. M. y Fong, C. T. (1999). “I’m innocent!”: Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room. Law and Human Behavior, 23
• Kassin, S. M. y Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest
• Kassin, S. M. y Norwick, R. J. (2004). Why suspects waive their Miranda rights: The power of innocence. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 211-221.
• Kassin, S. M., Leo, R. A., Meissner, C. A., Richman, K. D., Colwell, L. H., Leach, A.-M. y La Fon, D. (2007). Police interviewing and interrogation: A self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law and Human Behavior, 31
• Kleiner, M. (Ed.), (2002). Handbook of polygraph testing. San Diego, CA, Estados Unidos: Academic Press.
• Köhnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A. y Bull, R. (1999). The cognitive interview: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 5
• Levine, T. R., Park, H. S. y McCornack, S. A. (1999). Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the “veracity effect”. Communication Monographs, 66
• Link, F. C., y Foster, D. G. (1989). The kinesic interview technique. Riverdale, CA, Estados Unidos: Interrotec Associates.
• Lykken, D. T. (1998). A tremor in the blood. Uses and abuses of the lie detector. Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Plenum Press.
• Mann, S., Vrij, A. y Bull, R. (2004). Detecting true lies: Police officers’ ability to detect suspects’ lies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89
• Masip, J. (2005). ¿Se pilla antes a un mentiroso que a un cojo? Sabiduría popular frente a conocimiento científico sobre la detección no-verbal del engaño. Papeles del Psicólogo, 26
• Masip, J., Alonso, H., Garrido, E., y Antón, C. (2005). Generalized Communicative Suspicion (GCS) among police officers: Accounting for the investigator bias effect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35
• Masip, J., Alonso, H., Garrido, E. y Barba, A. (2008). Police officers’ suspicion and veracity judgments. Comunicación presentada en la 18th Conference of the European association of Psychology and Law, Maastricht, Holanda.
• Masip, J., Alonso, H., Garrido, E. y Herrero, C. (2009). Training to detect what? The biasing effects of training on veracity judgments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23
• Masip, J., Alonso, H. y Herrero, C. (2006). Verdades, mentiras y su detección a partir del comportamiento no verbal. En E. Garrido, J. Masip y C. Herrero (Eds.), Psicología jurídica. Madrid, España: Pearson.
• Masip, J. y Garrido, E. (2006). La obtención de información mediante el interrogatorio del sospechoso. En E. Garrido, J. Masip y C. Herrero (Eds.), Psicología jurídica (pp. 339- 3�0). Madrid, España: Pearson.
• Masip, J., Garrido, E. y Herrero, C. (2003). When did you conclude she was lying? The impact of the moment the decision about the sender’s veracity is made and the sender’s facial appearance on police officers’ credibility judgments. Journal of Credibility Assessment and Witness Psychology, 4
• Masip, J., Garrido, E. y Herrero, C. (2006). Observers’ decision moment in deception detection experiments: Its impact on judgment, accuracy, and confidence. International Journal of Psychology, 41, 304-319.
• Masip, J., Garrido, E. y Herrero, C. (2009). Heuristic versus systematic of information in detecting deception: Questioning the truth bias. Psychological Reports, 105
• Masip, J., Garrido, E., Herrero, C., Antón, C. y Alonso, H. (2006). Officers as lie detectors: Guilty before charged. En D. Chadee y J. Young (Eds.), Current themes in social psychology. Mona, Jamaica: The University of the West Indies Press.
• Masip, J., Herrero, C., Garrido, E. y Barba, A. (2009). Is the Behavior Analysis Interview just common sense? Manuscrito enviado para su publicación.
• Meissner, C. A. y Kassin, S. M. (2002). “He’s guilty!”: Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior, 26
• Milne, R. y Bull, R. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Chichester: Wiley.
• Park, H. S., Levine, T. R., McCornack, S., Morrison, K. y Ferrara, M. (2002). How people really detect lies. Communication Monographs, 69
• Real Decreto 614/1995, de 21 de abril, por el que se aprueba el Reglamento de los procesos selectivos y de formación en el Cuerpo Nacional de Policía
• Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7
• Sporer, S. L. y Schwandt, B. (2006). Paraverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20
• Sporer, S. L. y Schwandt, B. (2007). Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13, 1-34.
• Strömwall. L. A., Granhag, P. A. y Hartwig, M. (2004). Practitioners’ beliefs about deception. En P. A. Granhag y L. A. Strömwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 229-2�0). Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.
• Vrij, A. (2004a). Guidelines to catch a liar. En P. A. Granhag y L. A. Strömwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.
• Vrij, A. (2004b). Why professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9
• Vrij, A. (2005). Cooperation of liars and truth tellers. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19
• Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities (2ª ed.). Chichester, Reino Unido: Wiley.
• Vrij, A., Fisher, R., Mann, S. y Leal, S. (2008). A cognitive load approach to lie detection. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 5, 39-43.
• Vrij, A., Mann, S. y Fisher, R. P. (2006). An empirical test of the Behavior Analysis Interview. Law and Human Behavior, 30
• Vrij, A., Mann, S., Fisher, R., Leal, S., Milne, R. y Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32
• Zuckerman, M., Koestner, R., y Driver, R. (1981). Beliefs about cues associated with deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6.