Fiabilidad y validez

  1. Prieto Adánez, Gerardo
  2. Delgado González, Ana Rosa
Revista:
Papeles del psicólogo

ISSN: 0214-7823,  1886-1415

Ano de publicación: 2010

Título do exemplar: Metodología al servicio del psicólogo

Volume: 31

Número: 1

Páxinas: 67-74

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Papeles del psicólogo

Resumo

The psychometric properties of reliability and validity and the procedures used to assess them are conceptually described in this chapter. The part devoted to the reliability, or test score accuracy, is focused in the models, procedures and statistical indicators most usually employed. As to validity, the most important psychometric property, and the one whose conception has changed the most, we summarize its history in testing contexts. The reader is prevented that reliability and validity are not, as usually thought, properties of the testing instruments but of the particular inferences made from the scores. Another common error is considering reliability and validity, not as questions of degree, but as absolute properties.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association y National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Borsboom, D. y Mellenberg, G.J. (2007). Test Validity in Cognitive Assessment. En J.P. Leighton y M.J. Gierl (Eds.), Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment for Education (pp. 85-115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brennan, R.L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • de Ayala, R.J. (2009). The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Campbell, D.T. y Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1971). Test validation. En R.L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 443-507). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
  • Cronbach, L.J. y Meehl, P.E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
  • Delgado, A.R. y Prieto, G. (1997). Introducción a los métodos de investigación de la psicología. Madrid: Pirámide.
  • Gómez-Benito, J., Hidalgo, M.D. y Guilera, G. (2010). El sesgo de los instrumentos de medición. Tests justos. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 75-84.
  • Gulliksen, H. (1950). Theory of mental tests. New York, Wiley.
  • Haertel, E. H. (2006). Reliability. En R.L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational Measurement (pp. 65-110). Wesport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger Publishers.
  • Kane, M.T. (2006). Validation. En R.L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational Measurement (pp. 17-64). Wesport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger Publishers.
  • Martínez-Arias, M.R. (2010), Evaluación del desempeño. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 85-96.
  • Martinez-Arias, M.R., Hernández-Lloreda, M.J. y Hernández-Lloreda, M.V. (2006). Psicometría. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
  • Messick, S. (1989). Validity. En R.L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp13-103). New York: American Council on Education.
  • Muñiz, J. (1998). Teoría Clásica de los Tests. Madrid: Pirámide.
  • Muñiz, J. (2010). Las teorías de los tests: Teoría Clásica y Teoría de Respuesta a los Ítems. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 57-66.
  • Padilla, J.L., Gómez, J., Hidalgo, M.D. y Muñiz, J. (2007). Esquema conceptual y procedimientos para analizar la validez de las consecuencias del uso de los tests. Psicothema, 19, 173-178.
  • Prieto, G. y Muñiz, J. (2000). Un modelo para evaluar la calidad de los tests utilizados en España. Papeles del Psicólogo, 77, 65-71.
  • Sánchez-Meca, J. y Botella, J. (2010). Revisiones sistemáticas y meta-análisis: herramientas para la práctica profesional. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 7-17.
  • Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., y Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
  • Sireci, S.G. (1998). The construct of content validity. En Zumbo, B.D. (Ed.), Validity Theory and the Methods Used in Validation: Perspectives From the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 83-117). Kluwer Academic Press, The Netherlands.
  • Yang, X. y Embretson, S.E. (2007). Construct Validity and Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment. En J.P. Leighton y M.J. Gierl (Eds.), Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment for Education (pp. 119-145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zumbo, B.D. (2007). Validity: Foundational Issues and Statistical Methodology. In C.R. Rao and S. Sinharay (Eds.) Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 26: Psychometrics, (pp. 45-79). Elsevier Science B.V.: The Netherlands.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet