Heterosexual Romantic Relationships, Interpersonal Needs, and Quality of Life in Prison

  1. Carcedo González, Rodrigo Jesús 1
  2. Perlman, Daniel 2
  3. López Sánchez, Félix 1
  4. Orgaz Baz, Begoña 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

  2. 2 University of North Carolina at Greensboro
    info

    University of North Carolina at Greensboro

    Greensboro, Estados Unidos

    ROR https://ror.org/04fnxsj42

Revista:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Año de publicación: 2012

Volumen: 15

Número: 1

Páginas: 187-198

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5209/REV_SJOP.2012.V15.N1.37308 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Resumen

El objetivo de estudio era investigar el efector moderador del hecho de tener una pareja heterosexual dentro de prisión vs. no tenerla sobre la relación entre las necesidades interpersonales y la calidad de vida. Se llevaron a cabo entrevistas personales con 55 presos varones y 64 mujeres del Centro Penitenciario de Topas (España). Niveles altos de soledad social y niveles bajos de satisfacción sexual se asociaron con niveles más bajos de calidad de vida. Asimismo, la interacción entre la satisfacción sexual y el estado de pareja fue significativa. Niveles más altos de satisfacción sexual se asociaron con niveles más altos de calidad de vida tan sólo en el grupo sin pareja. Estos hallazgos resaltan la importancia de permitir a los internos tener relaciones de pareja heterosexuales dentro de la misma prisión, así como favorecer el que puedan tener una vida sexual satisfactoria durante el tiempo que están encarcelados.

Información de financiación

The authors are very grateful to the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación and the Consejería de Educación y Ciencia of Castilla y León, which provided two grants: One to carry out this study (SA007B08) and another to support the stay of the first author in the Department of Human Development and Family Studies at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, through the “José Castillejo” programme. The first author is also grateful to this department for its support and help with this project. He wants to thank Ioana Scripa for her help with the manuscript preparation. Finally, the authors would like to thank the collaboration and help of the Ministerio del Interior and Topas Penitentiary in developing and conducting this study.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.5.4.323
  • Beach, S. R., Fincham, F. D., Katz, J., & Bradbury, T. N. (1996). Social support in marriage: A cognitive perspective. In G. R. Pierce, B. R. Sarason, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Handbook of Social Support and the Family (pp. 43-65). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Biggam, F. H., & Power, K. G. (1997). Social support and psychological distress in a group of incarcerated young offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 41, 213-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306624X97413002
  • Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Cantor, M. H. (1979). Neighbors and friends: An overlooked resource in the informal support system. Research on Aging, 1, 434-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016402757914002
  • Carcedo, R. J. (2005). ecesidades sociales, emocionales y sexuales. Estudio en un centro penitenciario [Social, emotional and sexual needs. Study in a penitentiary]. Salamanca, Spain: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Salamanca.
  • Carcedo, R. J., López, F., Orgaz, M. B., Toth, K., & Fernández-Rouco, N. (2008). Men and women in the same prison: Interpersonal needs and psychological health of prison inmates. International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology, 52, 641-657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306624X07311596
  • Carcedo, R. J., Perlman, D., Orgaz, M. B., López, F., Fernández-Rouco, N., & Faldowski, R. (2011). Heterosexual romantic relationships inside of prison: Partner status as predictor of loneliness, sexual satisfaction, and quality of life. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 898-924. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306624X10373593
  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Cooke, D., Baldwin, P., & Howison. J. (1990). Psychology in prisons. London, England: Routlegde. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203423356
  • Demir, M., & Tyrell, F. (2008, July). Friendship and well-being among young adults with/out a romantic partner. Poster presented at the International Association of Relationship Research Conference. Providence, RI.
  • DiTommaso, E., & Spinner, B. (1997). Social an emotional loneliness: A re-examination of Weisś typology of loneliness. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 417-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00204-8
  • DiTommaso, E., Brannen, C., & Best, L. A. (2004). Measurement and validity characteristics of the short version of the social and emotional loneliness scale for adults. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 99-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164403258450
  • Dodge, M., & Pogrebin, M. R. (2001). Collateral costs of imprisonment for women: Complications of reintegration. The Prison Journal, 81, 42-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00328855 01081001004
  • Fishman, L. T. (1988). Prisoners and their wives: Marital and domestic effects of telephone contacts and home visits. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 32, 55-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306624X8803200108
  • Fuller, L. G. (1993). Visitors to women's prisons in California: An exploratory study. Federal Probation, 57(4), 41-47.
  • Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works! Criminology, 34, 575-608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01220.x
  • Goodman, L. A. (1961). "Snowball sampling". Annals of Mathe matical Statistics, 32, 148-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177705148
  • Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 924-936. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.3.924
  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0501_1
  • International Center for Prison Studies (2008). International profile of womeńs prisons. London, England: Author.
  • Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • James, D. J., & Glaze, L. E. (2006). Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Retrieved from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/mhppji.pdf
  • Jiang, S., & Winfree, L. T., Jr. (2006). Social support, gender, and inmate adjustment to prison life: Insights from a national sample. The Prison Journal, 86, 32-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0032885505283876
  • Koscheski, M., Hensley, C., Wright, J., & Tewksbury, R. (2002). Consensual sexual behavior. In C. Hensley (Ed.), Prison sex: Practice and policy (pp. 111-131). London, England: Lynne Rienner.
  • Levenson, L. (1983). Sexual attitudes of males in a protected environment. Journal of the American Society of Psychosomatic Dentistry & Medicine, 30, 135-136.
  • Lin, N., Dean, A., & Ensel, W. (1986). Social support, life events, and depression. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, Inc.
  • Lindquist, C. H. (2000). Social integration and mental well-being among jail inmates. Sociological Forum, 15, 431-455.
  • Lindquist, C. H., & Lindquist, C. A. (1997). Gender differences in distress: Mental health consequences of environmental stress among jail inmates. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 15, 503-523. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199723/09)15:4<503::AID-BSL281>3.0.CO;2-H
  • López, F. (1993). El apego a lo largo del ciclo vital [Attachment through the life-span]. In M. J. Ortiz & S. Yarnoz (Eds.), Teoría del apego y relaciones afectivas [Attachment theory and affective relationships] (pp. 11-62). Bilbao, Spain: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco.
  • López, F. (1997). Afecto y sexualidad [Affection and sexuality]. In J. Gómez-Zapiain (Ed.), Avances en sexología [Advances in sexology] (pp. 23-62). Bilbao, Spain: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco.
  • López, F. (2008). Necesidades en la infancia y en la adolescencia: Respuesta familiar, escolar y social [Needs in childhood and adolescence: Family, school, and social response]. Madrid, Spain: Pirámide.
  • Lucas, R. (1998). Versión española del WHOQOL [Spanish version of the WHOQOL]. Madrid, Spain: Ergon.
  • Maeve, M. K. (1999). The social construction of love and sexuality in a woman's prison. Advances in #ursing Science, 21(3), 46-65.
  • Manzanos, C., & Balmaseda, J. M. (2003). Situación de las Mujeres en las Cárceles del País Vasco [Women's situation in Vasque Country prisons]. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain: Servicio Central de Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco.
  • Marsh, R. L. (1983). Services for families: A model project to provide services for families of prisoners. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 27(2), 156-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306624X8302700208
  • Neuman, E. (1982). El problema sexual en las cárceles [The sexual problem in prisons]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Universidad.
  • Pearlin, L. I. (1989). The sociological study of stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 30, 241-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2136956
  • Pinquart, M. (2003). Loneliness in married, widowed, divorced, and never-married older adults. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 20, 31-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02654 075030201002
  • Proulx, C. M., Helms, H. M., & Buehler, C. (2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage & Family, 69, 576-593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00393.x
  • Quaker Council for European Affairs (2007). Women in prison: A Review of the conditions in member states of the Council of Europe. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  • Sack, W. H. (1977). Children of imprisoned fathers. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 40, 163-174.
  • Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., & Pierce, G. R. (1990). Social support: An interactional view. New York, NY: John Wiley.
  • Snell, W. E. (1995). The Multidimensional Self-Concept Questionnaire. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. E. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexualityrelated measures (pp. 521-524). London, England: Sage.
  • Toch, H. (1977). Living in prison: The Ecolology of survival. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Turner, R. J., Lloyd, D. A., & Wheaton, B. (1995). The epidemiology of social stresss. American Sociological Review, 60, 104-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2096348
  • Wright, E. M., Salisbury, E. J., & Van Voorhis, P. (2007). Predicting the prison misconducts of women offenders: The importance of gender-responsive needs. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23, 310-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1043986207 309595
  • Zamble, E., & Porporino, F. J. (1988). Coping, behaviour and adaptation in prisons. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.