Entrepreneurship as a legitimate field of knowledge

  1. Sánchez García, José Carlos
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Año de publicación: 2011

Volumen: 23

Número: 3

Páginas: 427-432

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Resumen

El emprendimiento como un campo legítimo del conocimiento. La investigación del emprendimiento se ha abordado desde disciplinas como la economía, la sociología o la psicología. Después de justifi car su estudio, defi nimos el dominio del emprendimiento haciendo hincapié en lo que hoy se ha convertido en el paradigma dominante, el proceso de descubrimiento, evaluación y explotación de oportunidades. A continuación, describiremos las principales perspectivas con el objetivo de ofrecer un marco conceptual integrado que nos permitirá legitimar el estudio de la iniciativa empresarial como un campo de conocimiento en su propio derecho. Creemos que este marco ayudará a los investigadores a reconocer mejor las relaciones entre los muchos factores que forman parte del estudio de la iniciativa empresarial. Por último, se concluye con unas breves refl exiones sobre el valor potencial del marco que se presenta

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ács, Z., & Varga, A. (2005). Entrepreneurship, agglomeration and technological change. Small Business Economics, Springer, 24(3), 323-334.
  • Aldrich, H.E., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In D. Sexton & R. Smilor (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 3-23). New York: Ballinger.
  • Baron, R.A. (2006). Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs «connect the dots» to identify new business opportunities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 104-119.
  • Baumol, W. (1993). Formal entrepreneurship theory in economics: Existence and bounds. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 197-210.
  • Busenitz, L.W., West G.P., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G.N., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Management, 29(3), 285-308.
  • Cantillon, R. (1755). Essai sur la nature du commerce en général. Ed. With English trans. and other material by Henry Higgs. London: MacMillan (for the Royal Economic Society), 1931.
  • Casson, M.C. (1982). The entrepreneur. An economic theory. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
  • Collins, O., & Moore, D. (1964). The enterprising man. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
  • Coughlin, J.H., & Thomas, A.R. (2002). The rise of women entrepreneurs: People, processes and global trends. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
  • Gaglio, C.M., & Katz, J. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Journal of Small Business Economics, 16, 11-95.
  • Gartner, W. (1990). What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneur-ship? Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), 15-29.
  • Gilad, B., Kaish, S., & Ronen, J. (1988). The entrepreneurial way with information. In S. Maital (Eds.), Applied behavioral economics (Vol. 2, pp. 481-503), Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.
  • Hisrich, R.D. (2000). Marketing. (2 nd edition). Hauppauge, NY: Barrons.
  • Hisrich, R., Langan-Fox, J., & Grant, S. (2007). Entrepreneurship research and practice: A call to action for psychology. American Psychologist, 62(6), 575-589.
  • Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, March, 18(2), 165-187.
  • Hostager, T., Neil, T., Decker, R., & Lorente, R. (1998). Seeing environmental opportunities: Effects of intrapreneurial ability, efficacy, motivation and desirability. Journal of Organisational Change Management, 11(1), 11-25.
  • Kirzner, I.M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Kirzner, I.M. (1977). Foreword. In L. Von Mises (Ed.) (2002), The ultimate foundations of economics. Foundation for Economic Education, 2nd ed.
  • Kirzner, I.M. (1979). Comment: X-inefficiency, error and the scope for entrepreneurship. In M. Rizzo (Ed.), Time, uncertainty and disequilibrium (pp. 141-151). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  • Kuratko, D.F. (2003). Entrepreneurship education: Emerging trends and challenges for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: Coleman Foundation White Paper Series.
  • Lazear, E.P. (2002). Entrepreneurship, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, working paper no. 9109.
  • Minniti, M., & Bygrave, W. (1999). The microfoundations of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23, 41-52.
  • Mitchell, R.K., Busenitz, L., Lant, T., McDougall, P.P., Morse, E. A., & Smith, B. (2002). Toward a theory of entrepreneurial cognition: Rethinking the people side of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 27, 93-104.
  • Morris, M.H., Schindehutte, M., & Lesser, J. (2002). Ethnic entrepreneurship: Do values matter? New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 35-46.
  • Murphy, P.J., Liao, J.W., & Welsch, H.P. (2006). A conceptual history of entrepreneurial thought. Journal of Management History, 12(1), 12-35.
  • North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pavia, T. (1991). The early stages of new product development in entrepreneurial high-tech firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8, 18-31.
  • Picot, A., Laub, U.D., & Schneider, D. (1989). Innovative unternehmensgruendungen: Eine Ökonomisch-Empirische Analyse. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Rauch, A., & Frese, M. (2007). Let's put the person back into entrepreneurship research: A meta-analysis of the relationship between business owners' personality characteristics and business creation and success. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(4), 353-385.
  • Reynolds, P., Bygrave, W., & Autio, E. (2004). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, GEM. Babson College, London Business School: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.
  • Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037.
  • Sánchez, J.C. (2010a). University training for entrepreneurial competencies: Its impact on intention of venture creation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, April, 1-16.
  • Sánchez, J.C. (2010b). Evaluation of entrepreneurial personality: Factorial validity of entrepreneurial orientation questionnaire (COE). Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 42(1), 32-52.
  • Sánchez, J.C. (2009). Social learning and entrepreneurial intentions: A comparative study between Mexico, Spain and Portugal. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 41(1), 107-117.
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1961). History of economic analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Shane, S. (1996). Hybrid organizational arrangements and their implications for firm growth and survival: A study of new franchisors. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 216-234 (reprinted in P. Westhead & M. Wright (Eds.) (1999). Advances in Entrepreneurship. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
  • Singh, S. (1985). Entrepreneurship and social change. Jaipur: Rawat Publications.
  • Stevenson, H.H., & Jarillo, J.C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 17-27.
  • Veciana, J.M. (2006). The RENT conferences over the last 20 years. Highlights and Research Trends. Keynote Speech at RENT XX, Brussels, 22-24 November.
  • Veciana, J. M. (2007). Entrepreneurship as a scientific research programme. In A. Cuervo, D. Ribeiro & S. Roig (Eds.), Entrepreneurship: Concepts, theory and perspective (pp. 23-71). Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor's perspective. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in Entrepreneurship (pp. 119-138). Greenwich: JAI Press.
  • Verin, H. (1982). Entrepreneurs, entreprises, histoire d'une idée. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • Weber, M. (1903). The methodology of the social sciences. Edward Shils and Henry Finch (Eds.). New York: Free Press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet