Un acercamiento a la investigación de diseños a través de los experimentos de enseñanza

Referencias bibliográficas

• BANNAN-RITLAND, B. y BAEK, J. Y. (2008). Investigating the act of design in design research: the road taken, en Kelly, A.E., Lesh, R.A. y Baek, J.Y. (eds.). Handbook of design research methods in education. Innovations in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Learning and Teaching, pp. 299-319. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• BARAB, S. y SQUIRE, K. (2004). Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), pp. 1-14. (Pubitemid 38202848)
• CARPENTER, T.P., FRANKE, M.L. y LEVI, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: integrating arithmetic y algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
• CASTRO, E. (1995). Exploración de patrones numéricos mediante configuraciones puntuales. Granada: Comares.
• CASTRO, E. y MOLINA, M. (2007). Desarrollo de Pensamiento Relacional mediante trabajo con igualdades numéricas en aritmética básica. Educación Matemática, 19(2), pp. 67-94.
• COBB, P. (2000). The Importance of a Situated View of Learning to the Design of Research and Instruction, en Boaler, J. (eds.). Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning, pp. 45-82. Londres: Ablex Publishing.
• COBB, P., CONFREY, J., DISESSA, A., LEHRER, R. y SCHAUBLE, L. (2003). Desing experiment in Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), pp. 9-13.
• COBB, P. y GRAVEMEIJER, K. (2008). Experimenting to support and understand learning processes, en Kelly, A.E., Lesh, R.A. y Baek, J.Y. (eds.). Handbook of design research methods in education. Innovations in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Learning and Teaching, pp. 68-95. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• COBB, P., STEPHAN, M., MCCLAIN, K. y GRAVEMEIJER, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1-2), pp. 113-164. (Pubitemid 33252286)
• COLLINS, A., JOSEPH, D. y BIELACZYC, K. (2004). Design research: theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), pp. 15-42. (Pubitemid 38202849)
• CONFREY, J. (2006). The evolution of design studies as methodology, en Sawyer, R.K. (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 135-152. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
• DBRC (THE DESIGN BASED RESEARCH COLLECTIVE) (2003). Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), pp. 5-8.
• DEDE, C. (2004). If design-based research is the answer, what is the question? A commentary on Collins, Joseph, and Bielaczyc; diSessa and Cobb; Fishman, Marx, Blumenthal, Krajcik, and Soloway in the JLS Special Issue on Design-Based Research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), pp. 105-114. (Pubitemid 38202852)
• DISESSA, A.A. y COBB, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), pp. 77-103. (Pubitemid 38202851)
• ELLIOT, J. (1990). La investigación-acción en educación. Madrid: Morata.
• HJALMARSON M.A. y LESH, R. (2008). Design research. Engineering, systems, products, and processes for innovation, en English, L.D. (ed.). Handbook of international research in mathematics education, pp. 520-534. Londres: Routledge.
• HOCH, M. (2003, marzo). Structure sense. Presentado en The Third Conference of the European Researchers in Mathematics Education, Bellaria, Italia. Disponible en <http://www.dm.unipi.it/~didattica/CERME3/proceedings/ Groups/TG6/TG6-hoch-cerme3.pdf>.
• IIVARI, J. y VENABLE, J. (2009, junio). Action Research and Design Science Research -seemingly similar but decisively dissimilar. Presentado en el 17th European Conference on Information Systems, Verona, Italia. Disponible en <http://www.ecis2009.it/papers/ecis2009-0424.pdf>.
• KELLY, A.E. (2004). Design research in education: yes, but is it methodological? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), pp. 115-128.
• KELLY, A.E., BAEK, J.Y., LESH, R.A. y BANNAN-RITLAND, B. (2008). Enabling innovations in education and systematizing their impact, en Kelly, A.E., Lesh, R.A. y Baek, J.Y. (eds.). Handbook of design research in methods in education. Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching, pp. 3-18. Nueva York: Routledge.
• KELLY, A.E. y LESH, R.A. (2000). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Nueva Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• KELLY, A.E., LESH R.A. y BAEK J.Y. (eds.) (2008). Handbook of design research in methods in education. Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. Nueva York: Routledge.
• LESH, R.A. y KELLY, A.E. (2000). Multitiered teaching experiments, en Kelly, A.E. y Lesh, R.A. (eds.). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education, pp. 197-230. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum associates.
• MOLINA, M. (2006). Desarrollo de pensamiento relacional y comprensión del signo igual por alumnos de tercero de educación primaria. Tesis doctoral. Granada: Departamento de Didáctica de la Matemática, Universidad de Granada. Disponible en <http://funes. uniandes.edu.co/544/>.
• MOLINA, M. (2009). Una Propuesta de Cambio Curricular: Integración del Pensamiento Algebraico en Educación Primaria. PNA, 3(3), pp. 135-156. Disponible en <http://www.pna.es/Numeros2/pdf/Molina2009Una.pdf>.
• MOLINA, M. y AMBROSE, R. (2008). From an operational to a relational conception of the equal sign. Thirds graders' developing algebraic thinking. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 30(1), pp. 61-80.
• MOLINA, M., CASTRO, E. y CASTRO. E. (2009). Elementary students' understanding of the equal sign in number sentences. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 17, 7(1), pp. 341-368. Disponible en <http://www.investigacion-psicopedagogica.org/revista/articulos/17/english/ Art-17-304.pdf>.
• MOLINA, M. y MASON, J. (2009). Justifications-on-demand as a device to promote shifts of attention associated with relational thinking in elementary arithmetic. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 9(4), pp. 224-242.
• PECHARROMAN, C. y ORTEGA, T. (2009). Diseño de un marco de investigación. Aplicación al proceso de aprendizaje de las propiedades globales de las funciones, en González, M.J. y Murillo, J. (eds.). Investigación en Educación Matemática XIII (pp. 367-378). Santander: SEIEM.
• RICO, L., CASTRO, E., CASTRO, E., CORIAT, M., MARÍN, A. y PUIG, L. et al. (1997). La educación matemática en la enseñanza secundaria. Barcelona: Editorial Horsori e Institut de Ciències de l'Educació.
• SAWYER, R.K. (2006). The New Science of Learning, en Sawyer, R.K. (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 1-18. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
• SHAVELSON, R. J., PHILLIPS, D.C., TOWNE, L. y FEUER, M.J. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32(1), pp. 25-28. (Pubitemid 36209340)
• SLAVIT, D. (1999). The role of operation sense in transitions from arithmetic to algebraic thought. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(3), pp. 251-274.
• SOWDER, J. (1992). Estimation and Number Sense, en Grouws, D.A. (ed.). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, pp. 371-389. Nueva York: Macmillan Publishing Company y NCTM.
• STEFFE, L. y THOMPSON, P.W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: underlying principles and essential elements, en Kelly, A.E. y Lesh, R.A. (eds.). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education, pp. 267-306. Mahwah: NJ: LAE.