El partido ignaciano: estructuración en el exilio y supervivencia tras la muerte del patriarca Ignacio I
ISSN: 1989-9289
Year of publication: 2010
Issue: 1
Pages: 379-393
Type: Article
More publications in: El Futuro del Pasado: revista electrónica de historia
Abstract
The deposition of the patriarch Ignatius I on 23 November of 858 and his later exile plunged the Byzantine Church into the first one of the post-Iconoclast crises that she should know. The consecration of Photius like his substitute the day of Christmas of the year 858 did not drive away the discomfort created in the bosom of the East Christianity, but toughened the positions of clergymen, hegoumenoi and archbishops originating the dispute known as the Photian Schism. This conflict marked the second half of the Byzantine 9th century and was accentuated by Photius� exile and excommunication, by the restoration of Ignacio (867-877) and by Photius� second patriarchate (877-886). The present work aimes to analyze the structure of the Ignatian party during the difficult years when his leader was missing and the way in which their cause survived after Ignatius� death (when Photius exercised his ministry without opponents). For it we are going to focus principally on a source that has gone unnoticed until now but which testimony is greatly eloquent: patriarch Photius� collection of Epistles.
Bibliographic References
- BURY, J. B., A History of the Later Roman Empire from the Fall of Irene to the Accession of Basil I (802-867), London, 1912.
- DARROUZÈS, J., “Le Patriarche Méthode contre les Iconoclastes et les Stoudites”,REB45 (1987) pp. 15-57.
- DOBSCHÜTZ, E.VON, “Methodius und die Studiten”, Byz18 (1908) pp. 41-105.
- DVORNIK, F., The Photian Schism. History and Legend, Cambridge, 1948 [reimp. 1970].
- DVORNIK,F., “The Patriarch Photius in the Light of recent Research”,enBerichte zum XI. Intern. Byzantinistenkongress, München, 1958, vol. III/2, pp. 1-56 [reimpr. enPhotian and Byzantine Ecclesiastical Studies,Londres,Variorum 1974, capítulo VI].
- GRUMEL, V., “L’encyclique de Photius aux Orientaux et les patriarches de Constantinople Sisinnius II et Sergius II”,EO34 (1935) pp. 129-138.
- GRUMEL, V., “La g enèse du schisme photien. La successiond’Ignace”, en Atti del V Congresso Internazionale degli Studi Bizantini, RSBN5 (1939) pp. 179-184.
- GRUMEL, V., “Le schisme de Grégoire de Syracuse”, ΕΟ39 (1940-42)pp. 257-267.
- GRUMEL, V., Les regestes des actes du Patriarcat de Constantinople. Vol. I. Les Actes des Patriarches. Fasc. II et III: Les Regestes de 715 a 1206, Paris, 19892.
- GUILLAND, R., “Curopalate”, Byzantina 2 (1970) pp. 187-249 [reimp. enID.,Titres et fonctions de l’Empire byzantin, Londres, 1976].
- HERGENRÖTHER, J., Photius von Konstantinopel: sein Leben, seine Schriftenund das griechische Schisma nach handschriftlichen und gedrunckten Quellen,3 vols., Regensburg,1869 [reimpr. Darmstadt, 1966].
- JANIN, R.,Les églises et les monastères des grands centres byzantins (Bithynie, Helllespont, Latros, Galèsios, Trébizonde, Athènes, Thessalonique),Paris, 1975.
- KARLIN-HAYTER, P., “Gregory of Siracusa, Ignatios und Photios”, enBRYER, A.yHERRIN, J.(eds.), Iconoclasm. Papers Given at the Ninth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies (University of Birmingham, March 1975), Birmingham,1977, pp. 141-145.
- LAOURDAS, B. y WESTERINK, L. G., Photii patriarchae constantinopolitani Epistulae et Amphilochia, vols. 1-3, Leipzig, Teubner, 1983-1987.
- LILIE, R.-J., et al., Prosopographie der mittelbyzantinischen Zeit. 1-,Berlin 1999- [=PmbZ].
- MANSI, G. D., Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, Florencia-Venecia, 1759-1798.
- STEPHANOU, P., “Les débuts de la querelle photienne vus de Rome et de Byzance”, OCP18 (1952) pp. 270-80.
- STEPHANOU,Ρ., “La violation du compromis entre Photius et les Ignatiens”,OCP21 (1955)pp.291-307