Las clasificaciones bibliográficasde los estantes a la web

Referencias bibliográficas

• Begelman, G., Keller, P.; Smadja, F. (2006), Automatedtagclustering [en Línea]: improving search and exploration in thetagspace. En: WWW 2006: 15th InternationalWorld Wide Web Conference: Edinburgh, Scotland, May 23-26, 2006, <www.pui.ch/phred/automated_tag_clustering/automated_tag_clustering.pdf> [Consulta 26 denoviembre de 2010]
• Broughton, V.; Heather L (2000) Classification Schemes Revisited: Applications toWeb Indexing and Searching. Journal of Internet Cataloguing, n. 2(3/4),143-155.
• Buchanan, B. (1979). Theory of Library Classification. London: Clive-Bingley.Campbell, D. G. (2007) The Birth of the New Web: A Foucauldian Reading of the Se-mantic Web. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, n. 43(3/4), 9-20.
• Chan, L.M. (1995) Classification: presentandfuture. Cataloging&ClassificationQuarterly,n. 21(2), 5-17.
• Chan, L.M. (2000) Exploiting LCSH, LCC, and DDC to retrieve networked resources[enlínea]. En: Confronting the challenges of networked resources and the web: Bicenten-nial Conference on Bibliographic Control for the New Millennium [en línea]. Libraryof Congress, 2000. <http://lcweb.loc.gov/catdir/bibcontrol/chan_paper.html>[Consulta 26 de noviembre de 2010]
• Dahlberg, Ingetraut (1993). Why Knowledge Organization?: Reasons for International Classification’s change of name. Knowledge Organisation, n. 20(1), 1.
• DESIRE Project (1997) Development of an European Service for Informationon Research an dE-ducation[en línea]:The role of classificationsc hemesin Internet resource description and discovery <www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/desire/classification/classification.pdf> [Consulta 26 de noviembre de 2010]
• Domínguez Sanjurjo, M. R. (1996) Nuevas formas de organización y servicios en la biblioteca pública. Gijón: Trea.
• Efthimiadis, E. N. (1996) Query expansion. En: Annual Review of Information Science and-Technology. M. E. Willians. Medford, N.J: Information Today, n. 31, 121-187.
• Esteban Navarro, M. A. (1995) “Fundamentos epistemológicos de la clasificación documental”. Scire, n. 1(1), 79-101.
• Foucault, M. (1997) Las palabras y las cosas: una arqueología de las ciencias humanas. 25ªed., Madrid: Siglo XXI de España.
• Gödert, W. (1991) Facet Classification in Online Retrieval. International Classification,n.18(2), 98-109.
• Golub, K. (2006). Automated subject classification of textual web documents. Journal of Documentation, n. 62(3), 350-71.
• Golub, K; Lykke, M. (2009). Automated classification of web pages in hierarchical brow-sing. Journal of Documentation, n. 65(6), 901-925.
• Grolier, E. de (1962) Étude sur les catégories générales applicables aux classifications etcodifications documentaires. Paris: UNESCO.
• Guenter, R.S. (1996) Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme: implementation of the USMARC Format for Classification Data. En: Cataloging andclassification standards and rules. J. Reiemer, ed. Harworth Press
• Koch, T.; Neuroth, H.; Day, M. Renardus (2003) Cross-browsing European subject gate-ways via a common classification system (DDC). En: Subject retrieval in a networ-ked world: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, August 14-16, 2001;McIlwaine, I.C., Ed.; K.G. Saur: München, 25-33.
• Koch, T., Golub, K., Ardö, A. (2006), Users’ browsing behaviour in a DDC-based web service: a loganalysis. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, n.42(3/4), 163-86
• Langridge, D.W. (1995) Alternative starting points in classification. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, n. 19(3/4), 7-15
• Lee, H. (2008). Origins of the main classes in the first Chinese bibliographic classifica-tion. In: Culture and identity in knowledge organization: proceedings of the tenth Inter-national ISKO Conference, 5-8 August 2008, Montréal, Canada ed. by Clément Ar-senault and Joseph T. Tennis. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, 274-281
• López-Huertas Pérez, Mª. José (1991). Lenguajes documentales: aproximación a la evolución histórica de un concepto. Boletín de la ANABAD, n. XLI, 61-70.
• McKiernan, G. (1999) Proyect Aristotle(sm)-Automated Categorization of Web Resources [enlínea] <http://www.public.iastate.edu/~CYBERSTACKS/Aristotle.htm>[Consul-ta 26 de noviembre de 2010]
• Maltby, A. (1978) Sayer’s Manual of Classification for Librarians. 5th ed. London: André-Deutsch, 113-116.
• Maniez, Jacques (1993). Los lenguajes documentales y de clasificación. Salamanca : Fundación Germán Sánchez Ruipérez ; Madrid : Pirámide, 1993
• Marchionini, G. (1997) Information seeking in electronic environments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Markey, Karen (2006). Forty years of classification online: final chapter or future unlimited? Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, n. 42(3/4), 1-63.
• McIlwaine, I. C. (1997) The Universal Decimal Clasification: some factors concerning itsorigins, development and influence. Journal of the American Society for InformationScience, n. 48(4), 331-339.
• Pinto Molina, M. (Ed.) (1997) Manual de clasificación documental. Editora, María Pinto. Madrid: Síntesis.
• Olson, H. A. (1994) Universal models: a history of the organization of knowledge. En: Knowledge organization and quality management: proceedings of the Third International ISKOConference, 20-24 June 1994. H. Albrechtsenand S. Oernager, eds. Frankfurt/Main: Indeks, 72-80.
• Olson, H.A., Boll, J.J. (2001). Subject analysis in online catalogs. 2nd ed. Englewood: Libraries Unlimited.
• Prieto-Díaz, R. (2003) A Faceted Approach to Building Ontologies [en línea]. En: Procee-dingsofthe2003 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, October 27-29, 2003, Las Vegas, NV.<https://users.cs.jmu.edu/prietorx/Public/pu-blications/BulidOntologiesRPD-ER2002.doc>[Consulta 26 de noviembre de 2010]
• Rodríguez-Castro, B., Les Carr, H.G. (2010) How to Reuse a Faceted Classification and Putit on the Semantic Web [en línea]. En: 9th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2010), Shanghai, november 7-11 2010 <http://iswc2010.semanticweb.org/pdf/253.pdf> [Consulta 26 de noviembre de 2010]
• Roy, R. (1987). Classer & Indexer: introduction a l’indexation documentaire. Le Mans: Bibliothèque de l’Universitédu Maine.
• Rowley, J.E. (1988). Organizing knowledge: an introduction to information retrieval. Alders-hot: Ashgate.
• Saeed, H.; Chaudhry, A.S. (2002). Using Dewey decimal classification scheme (DDC) for building taxonomies for knowledge organisation. Journalof Documentation, n. 58(5), 575-583.
• San Segundo Manuel, Rosa (1996). Sistemas de organización del conocimiento: la organización del conocimiento en las bibliotecas españolas. Madrid: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Boletín Oficial del Estado.
• Serrrai, A. (1977) La classificazioni: idee, materiali per una teoria e per una storia. Florencia: Leo Olschki, 1977
• Soergel, D., et al. (2004), Reengineering the sauri for new applications [en línea]: the AGROVOC example, Journal of Digital Information <http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v04/i04/Soergel/> [Consulta 26 de noviembre de 2010]
• Vickery, B. (1975). Classification and indexing in science. London: Butterworths Scientific Publications, 1975Vickery, B.(2008) Faceted classification for the web. Axiomathes, n.18(2), 145-160.
• Vizine-Goetz, D. (1996), Using library classification schemes for internet resources[en línea]. En: OCLC Internet Cataloging Project Colloquium,<http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/ebook/aw/oclc/man/colloq/v-g.htm>[Consulta 26 de noviembre de 2010]
• Vizine-Goetz, D. (2001) Dewey in CORC: Classification in metadata and pathfinders. Journal of Internet Cataloging, n.4 (1/2), 67-80.
• Witty, F.J. (1958). The Pinakes of Callimachus. Library Quarterly, n. 28(2), 132-136.
• Yi, K., Chan, L.M (2009). Linking folksonomy to Library of Congress subject headings:an exploratory study. Journal of Documentation, n. 65(6), 872.900.
• Zhonghon, W.; Chaudhry, A. S.; Khoo, C. (2006). Potential and prospects of taxonomiesfor content organization. Knowledge Organization, n. 33(3), 160-169.