The emergence of external sources of attribution in a pilot study of science popularizations from The Guardian newspaper

Referencias bibliográficas

• Adams Smith, D. E. 1987. “The process of popularization: Rewriting medical research papers for the layman: Discussion paper”. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 80: 634-636.
• Bell, A. 1991. The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Calsamiglia, H. and C. López Ferrero. 2003. “Role and position in scientific voices: Reported speech in the media”. Discourse Studies 5 (2): 147-173.
• Conrad, S. and D. Biber. 1999. “Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing”. Evaluation in Text. Eds. S. Hunston and G. Thompson. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 56-73.
• Dor, D. 2003. “On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers”. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 695-721.
• Elorza, I. 2010. “A cross-cultural analysis of popularizations in English and Spanish newspaper discourse”. English Studies 31: 85-109.
• Fagan, A. and P. Martín Martín. 2004. “The use of critical speech acts in Psychology and Chemistry research papers”. Ibérica 8: 125-137.
• García Riaza, B. 2010a. “Explicit attribution sources expressed by ‘according to’ in a corpus of science popularization articles from The Guardian”. Interlingüística 21: 157-168.
• García Riaza, B. 2010b. “Mapping attribution across texts: the particle ‘according to’ in science popularizations and editorials from The Guardian”. Paper presented at Mapping Language across Cultures Conference (MLAC10), Salamanca, 5-7 July 2010.
• Gil Salom L. 2000-2001. “El discurso de la ciencia y la tecnología: el artículo científico de investigación vs. el artículo de divulgación científica”. RESLA 14: 429-449.
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
• Halliday M. A. K. and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd revised edition. London: Edward Arnold.
• Ho-Dac, L.-M. 2008. “Discourse organisation though Theme position”. Proceedings of the Nineteenth European Systemic Functional Linguistics Conference and Workshop. Saarbrücken, Germany. Eds. E. Steiner and S. Neumann. [Available at http://scidok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2008/1691/].
• Hoey, M. 2005. Lexical Priming. London: Routledge.
• Hunston, S. 1999. “Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts”. Evaluation in Text. Eds. S. Hunston and G. Thompson. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 176-205.
• Hyde, J.R. 1999. “‘Lo demás es literatura’: Predicción y adversatividad en textos argumentativos en inglés y español”. Lingüística para el siglo XXI. Vol. II. Eds. J. Fernández González, C. Fernández Juncal, M. Marcos Sánchez, E. Prieto de los Mozos and L. Santos del Río. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca. 935-941.
• Hyland, K. 2000. “Academic attribution: Interaction through citation”. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interaction in Academic Writing. London: Longman. 20-40.
• Hyland K. 2010. “Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9 (2): 116-127.
• Kenward. M. 1988. “Parasites in the press”. Parasitology Today 4 (2): 31-32.
• Kim C. K. and G. Thompson. 2010. “Obligation and reader involvement in English and Korean science popularizations: A corpus-based cross-cultural text analysis”. Text & Talk 30 (1): 53-73.
• Mahlberg, M. 2007. “Lexical items in discourse: identifying local textual functions of sustainable development”. Text, Discourse and Corpora: Theory and Analysis. Eds. M. Hoey, M. Mahlberg, M. Stubbs and W. Teubert. London: Continuum.
• Mahlberg, M and M. O’Donnell. 2008. “A fresh view of the structure of hard news stories”. Proceedings of the Nineteenth European Systemic Functional Linguistics Conference and Workshop. Saarbrücken, Germany. Eds. E. Steiner and S. Neumann. [Available at: http://scidok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2008/1700/].
• Marks, L.A., N. Kalaitzandonakes, L. Wilkins and L. Zakharova. 2007. “Mass media framing of biotechnology news”. Public Understanding of Science 16 (2): 183-203.
• Myers G. 1990. “Making a discovery: narratives of split genes”. Narrative in Culture: The Uses of Storytelling in the Sciences, Philosophy, and Literature. Ed. C. Nash. London: Routledge. 102-126.
• Myers, G. 1994. “Narratives of science and nature in popularizing molecular genetics”. Advances in Written Text Analysis. Ed. M. Coulthard. London: Routledge. 179-190.
• O’Keeffe K. J. 2002. “The quality press in Ireland: A linguistic analysis of two texttypes”. Windows on the World: Media Discourse in English. Ed. A. Sánchez Macarro Valencia: Universitat de València. 239-263.
• Ozturk, I. 2007. “The textual organization of research article introductions in applied linguistics: variability within a single discipline”. English for Specific Purposes 26 (1): 25-38.
• Reah, D. 2002. The Language of Newspapers. Abingdon: Routledge.
• Scott M. 1997. “PC Analysis of key words – and key key words”. System 25 (2): 233-245.
• Scott, M. 2004-2005. WordSmith Tools, Version 4.0. Oxford: Oxford University Press [Software].
• Skorczynska, H. 2001. “Metaphor in scientific business journals and business periodicals: an example of the scientific discourse popularisation”. Ibérica 3: 43-60.
• Thompson, G. 1996. “Voices in the text: Discourse perspectives on language reports”. Applied Linguistics 17 (4): 501-530.
• Thompson, G. 2004. Introducing Functional Grammar. 2nd edition. London: Edward Arnold.
• Williams Camus, J. T. 2009. “Metaphors of cancer in scientific popularization articles in the British press”. Discourse Studies 11 (4): 465-495.
• Zapaterra, Y. 2008. Diseño Editorial: Periódicos y revistas. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili. [Translation from Zapaterra, Y. 2007. Editorial Design: For Print and Electronic Media. London: Lawrence King].