Nuevas aproximaciones en detección de mentiras I.antecedentes y marco teórico

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aamodt, M. G. y Custer, H. (2006). Who can best catch a liar? A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. The Forensic Examiner, 16, 6-11.
• Alonso, H., Masip, J., Garrido, E. y Herrero, C. (2009). El entrenamiento de los policías para detectar mentiras. Estudios Penales y Criminológicos, 29, 7-60.
• Blair, J. P. y Kooi, B. (2004). The gap between training and research in the detection of deception. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 6, 77-83.
• Blair, J. P., Levine, T. R., Reimer, T. O. y McCluskey, J. D. (2012). The gap between reality and research. Another look at detecting deception in field settings. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 35, 723-740.
• Blair, J. P., Levine, T. R. y Shaw, A. S. (2010). Content in context improves deception detection accuracy. Human Communication Research, 36, 423-442.
• Blair, J. P. y McCamey, W. P. (2002). Detection of de- ception: An analysis of the Behavioral Analysis Interview technique. Illinois Law Enforcement Executive Forum, 2, 165-169.
• Blandón-Gitlin, I., Fenn, E., Masip, J. y Yoo, A. (2014). Cognitive-load approaches to detect deception: Searching for cognitive mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 441-444.
• Bond, C. F., Jr. y DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214-234.
• Bond, C. F., Jr. y DePaulo, B. M. (2008). Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 477-492.
• Botella, J. y Gambara, H. (2006). Doing and reporting a meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 6, 425-440.
• Buller, D. B. y Burgoon, J. K. (1994). Deception: strategic and nonstrategic communication. En J. A. Daly y J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 191-223). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Chan, M. E. y Arvey, R. D. (2012). Meta-analysis and the development of knowledge. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 79-92.
• Christ, S. E., Van Essen, D. C., Watson, J. M., Brubaker, L. E. y McDermott, K. B. (2009). The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: Evidence from activation likelihood estimate metaanalyses. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1557-1566.
• Cooper, H. M. y Rosenthal, R. (1980). Statistical versus traditional procedures for summarizing research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 442-449.
• Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics. Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. Nueva York: Routledge.
• Debey, E., Verschuere, B. y Crombez, G. (2012). Lying and executive control: An experimental investigation using ego depletion and goal neglect. Acta Psychologica, 140, 133-141.
• DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K. y Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.
• DePaulo, B. M., Zuckerman, M. y Rosenthal, R. (1980a). Detecting deception: Modality effects. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 125-162.
• DePaulo, B. M., Zuckerman, M. y Rosenthal, R. (1980b). Humans as lie detectors. Journal of Communication, 30, 129-139.
• Ekman, P. (2009). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. Nueva York: WW Norton & Company.
• Ekman, P. y Friesen, W. V. (1969a). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry, 32, 88-106.
• Ekman, P. y Friesen, W. V. (1969b). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49-98.
• Farah, M. J., Hutchinson, J. B., Phelps, E. A. y Wagner, A. D. (2014). Functional MRI-based lie detection: scientific and societal challenges. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 123-131.
• Fenn, E., Blandón-Gitlin, I., Coons, J., Pineda, C. y Echon, R. (2014). The inhibitory spillover effect: Controlling the bladder makes better liars. Manuscrito enviado para su publicación.
• Frank, M. G. y Feeley, T. H. (2003). To catch a liar: Challenges for research in lie detection training. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 58-75.
• Frith, C. y Frith, U. (2005). Theory of mind. Current Biology, 15, R644-R645.
• Global Deception Research Team (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 60-74.
• Gombos, V. A. (2006). The cognition of deception: The role of executive processes in producing lies. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 197-214.
• Granhag, P. A. y Mac Giolla, E. (2014). Preventing future crimes. Identifying markers of true and false intent. European Psychologist, 19, 195-206.
• Hartwig, M., y Bond, C. F., Jr. (2011). Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 643-659.
• Hauch, V., Blandón-Gitlin, I., Masip, J. y Sporer, S. L. (2014). Are computers effective lie detectors? A metaanalysis of linguistic cues to deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review. Publicación previa online.
• Hauch, V., Sporer, S. L., Michael, S. W. y Meissner, C. A. (2014). Does training improve detection of deception? A meta-analysis. Communication Research. Publicación previa online.
• Horvath, F., Blair, J. P. y Buckley, J. P. (2008). The beha- vioral analysis interview: Clarifying the practice, theory and understanding of its use and effectiveness. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 10, 101-118.
• Horvath, F., Jayne, B. y Buckley, J. (1994). Differentiation of truthful and deceptive criminal suspects in Behavior Analysis Interviews. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 39, 793-807.
• Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P. y Jayne, B. C.
• (2013). Criminal interrogation and confessions (5ª ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
• Inglehart, R., Basáñez, M., Díez-Medrano, J., Halman, L. y Luijkx, R. (2004). Human beliefs and values. A cross-cultural sourcebook based on the 1999-2002 values surveys. México, DF: Siglo XXI Editores.
• Kassin, S. M. y Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33-67.
• Leo, R. A. y Drizin, S. A. (2010). The three errors: Pathways to false confession and wrongful conviction. En G. D. Lassiter and C. A. Meissner (Eds.), Police interrogations and false confessions. Current research, practice, and policy recommendations (pp. 9-30). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Levine, T. R. (2014). Active deception detection. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 122-128.
• Lipsey, M. W. y Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical metaanalysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Lisofsky, N., Kazzer, P., Heekeren, H. y Prehn, K. (2014). Investigating socio-cognitive processes in deception: A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychologia, 61, 113-122.
• Masip, J. (2005). ¿Se pilla antes a un mentiroso que a un cojo? Sabiduría popular versus conocimiento científico sobre la detección no-verbal del engaño. Papeles del Psicólogo, 26, 78-91
• Masip, J., Alonso, H., Garrido, E. y Herrero, C. (2009). Training to detect what? The biasing effects of training on veracity judgments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1282-1296.
• Masip, J., Alonso, H. y Herrero, C. (2006). Verdades, mentiras y su detección a partir del comportamiento no-verbal. En E. Garrido, J. Masip y C. Herrero (Eds.), Psicología jurídica (pp. 475-505). Madrid: Pearson.
• Masip, J., Barba, A. y Herrero, C. (2012). Behavior Analysis Interview and common sense. A study with novice and experienced officers. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 19, 21-34.
• Masip, J. y Garrido, E. (2000). La evaluación de la credibilidad del testimonio en contextos judiciales a partir de indicadores conductuales. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 10, 93-131.
• Masip, J. y Garrido, E. (2006). La obtención de información mediante el interrogatorio del sospechoso. En E. Garrido, J. Masip y C. Herrero (Eds.), Psicología jurídica (pp. 339-380). Madrid: Pearson.
• Masip, J. y Herrero, C. (2013). “What would you say if you were guilty?” Suspects’ strategies during a hypothetical Behavior Analysis Interview concerning a serious crime. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 60-70.
• Masip, J. y Herrero, C. (2015). Police detection of deception: Beliefs about behavioral cues to deception are strong even though contextual evidence is more useful. Journal of Communication, 65, 125-145.
• Masip, J., Herrero, C., Garrido, E. y Barba, A. (2011). Is the Behavior Analysis Interview just common sense? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 593-604.
• McCornack, S. A., Morrison, K., Paik, J. E., Wisner, A. M. y Zhu, X. (2014). Information Manipulation Theory 2: A propositional theory of deceptive discourse production. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 348-377.
• Park, H. S., Levine, T. R., McCornack, S. A., Morrison, K. y Ferrara, S. (2002). How people really detect lies. Communication Monographs, 69, 144-157.
• Pérez, S. (1996). La prohibición de mentir. Espiral. Estudios sobre Estado y Sociedad, 2(6), 21-44.
• Sánchez-Meca, J. y Botella, J. (2010). Revisiones sistemáticas y meta-análisis: Herramientas para la práctica profesional. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31, 7-17.
• Sporer, S. L. y Schwandt, B. (2006). Paraverbal indicators of deception: A meta analytic synthesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 421-446.
• Sporer, S. L. y Schwandt, B. (2007). Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13, 1-34.
• Starr, D. (2013, 2 de Diciembre). The interview. Do police interrogation techniques produce false confessions? The New Yorker, pp. 42-49.
• Strömwall, L., Granhag, P. A. y Hartwig, M. (2004). Practitioners’ beliefs about deception. En P.-A. Granhag y L. A. Strömwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 229-250). Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.
• Van Bockstaele, B., Verschuere, B., Moens, T., Suchotzki, K., Debey, E. y Spruyt, A. (2012). Learning to lie: Effects of practice on the cognitive cost of lying. Frontiers in Psychology, 3.
• Visu Petra, G., Miclea, M. y Visu Petra, L. (2012). Reaction time based detection of concealed information in relation to individual differences in executive functioning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 342-351.
• Visu-Petra, G., Varga, M., Miclea, M. y Visu-Petra, L. (2013). When interference helps: Increasing executive
• load to facilitate deception detection in the concealed information test. Frontiers in Psychology, 4.
• Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester, Reino Unido: Wiley.
• Vrij, A. y Granhag, P. A. (2012). Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the question asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 110-117.
• Vrij, A., Mann, S. y Fisher, R. P. (2006). An empirical test of the Behavior Analysis Interview. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 329-345.
• Vrij, A., Mann, S., Fisher, R., Leal, S., Milne, B. y Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 253-265.
• Walczyk, J. J., Griffith, D. A., Yates, R., Visconte, S. R., Simoneaux, B. y Harris, L. L. (2012). Lie detection by inducing cognitive load. Eye movements and other cues to the false answers of “witnesses” to crimes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 887-909.
• Walczyk, J. J., Harris, L. L., Duck, T. K. y Mulay, F. (2014). A social-cognitive framework for understanding serious lies: Activation-decision-constructionaction theory. New Ideas in Psychology, 34, 22-36.
• Walczyk, J. J., Igou, F. P., Dixon, A. P. y Tcholakian, T. (2013). Advancing lie detection by inducing cognitive load on liars: A review of relevant theories and techniques guided by lessons from polygraph-based approaches. Frontiers in psychology, 4.
• Walczyk, J. J., Mahoney, K. T., Doverspike, D. y GriffithRoss, D. A. (2009). Cognitive lie detection: Response time and consistency of answers as cues to deception. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 33-49.
• Walczyk, J. J., Roper, K. S., Seemann, E. y Humphrey, A. M. (2003). Cognitive mechanisms underlying lying to questions: Response time as a cue to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 755-774.
• Walczyk, J. J., Schwartz, J. P., Clifton, R., Adams, B., Wei, M. y Zha, P. (2005). Lying person to person about life events: A cognitive framework for lie detection. Personnel Psychology, 58, 141-170.
• Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M. y Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 1-59.
• Zuckerman, M. y Driver, R. E. (1985). Telling lies: Verbal and nonverbal correlates of deception. En A. W. Siegman y S. Feldstein (Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 129-147). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.