Nuevas aproximaciones en detección de mentiras IIestrategias activas de entrevista e información contextual

Referencias bibliográficas

• Blair, J. P., Levine, T. R., Reimer, T. O. y McCluskey, J. D. (2012). The gap between reality and research. Another look at detecting deception in field settings. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 35, 723-740.
• Blair, J. P., Levine, T. R. y Shaw, A. S. (2010). Content in context improves deception detection accuracy. Human Communication Research, 36, 423-442.
• Blandón-Gitlin, I., Echon, R. y Pineda, C. (2013, Junio). Detecting deception: The benefit of depleting executi- ve control in liars. Comunicación presentada en la X edición del congreso de la Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (SARMAC), Rotterdam, Holanda.
• Blandón-Gitlin, I., Fenn, E., Masip, J. y Yoo, A. (2014). Cognitive-load approaches to detect deception: Searching for cognitive mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 441-444.
• Bond, C. F., Jr., Howard, A. R., Hutchison, J. L. y Masip, J. (2013). Overlooking the obvious: Incentives to lie. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35, 212-221.
• Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G. y Weber, M. (1989). The course of knowledge in economic settings: An experimental analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1232-1254.
• Clemens, F., Granhag, P. A. y Strömwall, L. A. (2011). Eliciting cues to false intent. A new application of strategic interviewing. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 512-522.
• Clemens, F., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., Vrij, A., Landström, S., Roos af Hjelmsäter, E. y Hartwig, M. (2010). Skulking around the dinosaur: Eliciting cues to children's deception via strategic disclosure of evidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 925-940.
• Dando, C. J. y Bull, R. (2011). Maximising opportunities to detect verbal deception: Training police officers to interview tactically. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8, 189-202.
• Dando, C. J., Bull, R., Ormerod, T. C. y Sandham, A. L. (2015). Helping to sort the liars from the truth tellers: The gradual revelation of information during investigative interviews. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20, 114-128.
• DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K. y Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.
• Evans, J. R., Michael, S. W., Meissner, C. A. y Brandon, S. E. (2013). Validating a new assessment method for deception detection: Introducing a Psychologically Based Credibility Assessment Tool. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 33-41.
• Garrido, E. y Masip, J. (2001). La evaluación psicológica en los supuestos de abusos sexuales. En F. Jiménez (Ed.), Evaluación psicológica forense 1: Fuentes de información, abusos sexuales, testimonio, peligrosidad y reincidencia (pp. 25-140). Salamanca: Amarú.
• Gilovich, T., Savitsky, K. y Medvec, V. H. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others’ ability to read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 332-46.
• Glenberg, A. M., Schroeder, J. L. y Robertson, D. A. (1998). Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering. Memory & Cognition, 26, 651-658.
• Granhag, P. A. y Hartwig, M. (2008). A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 189-200.
• Granhag, P. A. y Strömwall, L. A. (2002). Repeated interrogations: Verbal and non-verbal cues to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 243-257.
• Granhag, P. A. y Strömwall, L. A. (2008). Detection of deception: Use of evidence in. En B. L. Cutler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology and law (pp. 204-206). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. y Hartwig, M. (2007). The SUE-technique: The way to interview to detect deception. Forensic Update, 88, 25-29.
• Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., Willén, R. y Hartwig, M. (2013). Eliciting cues to deception by tactical disclosure of evidence: The first test of the Evidence Framing Matrix. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18, 341-355.
• Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A. y Luke, T. (2014). Strategic use of evidence during investigative interviews: The state of the science. En D. C. Raskin, C. R. Honts y J.
• C. Kircher (Eds). Credibility assessment: Scientific research and applications (pp. 1-36). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A. y Kronkvist, O. (2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: When training to detect deception works. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 603-619.
• Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A. y Vrij, A. (2005). Detecting deception via strategic disclosure of evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 469-484.
• Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P. y Jayne, B. C. (2004). Criminal interrogation and confessions (4ª ed.) Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
• Johnson, M. K. y Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
• Jordan, S., Hartwig, M., Wallace, B., Dawson, E. y Xhihani, A. (2012). Early versus late disclosure of evidence: Effects on verbal cues to deception, confessions, and lie catchers' accuracy. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 9, 1-12.
• Leins, D., Fisher, R. y Vrij, A. (2012). Drawing on liars' lack of cognitive flexibility: Detecting deception through varying report modes. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 601-607.
• Leins, D., Fisher, R. P., Vrij, A., Leal, S. y Mann, S. (2011). Using sketch drawing to induce inconsistency in liars. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16, 253-265.
• Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.
• Masip, J., Blandón-Gitlin, I., Herrero, C., Ibabe, I. y Martínez, M. C. (2015, Marzo). Interviewing to detect deception: Inconsistency in answering central and peripheral questions across repeated interviews as a deception cue. Comunicación presentada en el congreso anual de la American Psychology-Law Society, San Diego, California, Estados Unidos.
• Masip, J. y Garrido, E. (2003). La detección del engaño mediante la técnica del control de la realidad. Encuentros en Psicología Social, 1(5), 113-121.
• Masip, J. y Herrero, C. (2013). “What would you say if you were guilty?” Suspects’ strategies during a hypothetical Behavior Analysis Interview concerning a serious crime. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 60-70.
• Masip, J. y Herrero, C. (2015a). Nuevas aproximaciones en detección de mentiras I. Antecedentes y marco teórico. Papeles del Psicólogo, 36, 83-95.
• Masip, J. y Herrero, C. (2015b). Police detection of deception: Beliefs about behavioral cues to deception are strong even though contextual evidence is more useful. Journal of Communication, 65, 125-145.
• Masip, J., Sporer, S. L., Garrido, E. y Herrero, C. (2005). The detection of deception with the Reality Monitoring approach: A review of the empirical evidence. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11, 99-122.
• Ormerod, T. C. y Dando, C. (2015). Finding a needle in a haystack: Toward a psychologically informed method for aviation security screening. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144, 76-84.
• Park, H. S., Levine, T. R., McCornack, S. A., Morrison, K. y Ferrara, S. (2002). How people really detect lies. Communication Monographs, 69, 144-157.
• Reinhard, M.-A., Scharmach, M. y Sporer, S. L. (2012). Situational familiarity, efficacy expectations, and the process of credibility attribution. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34, 107-127.
• Reinhard, M.-A., Sporer, S. L., Scharmach, M. y Marksteiner, T. (2011). Listening, not watching: Situational familiarity and the ability to detect deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 467-484.
• Sorochinski, M., Hartwig, M., Osborne, J., Wilkins, E., Marsh, J., Kazakov D. y Granhag, P. A. (2014). Interviewing to detect deception: When to disclose the evidence? Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 29, 87-94.
• Sporer, S. L. (2004). Reality monitoring and the detection of deception. En P.-A. Granhag y L. A. Strömwall (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 64-102). Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.
• Steller, M. y Köhnken, G. (1994). Análisis de declaraciones basado en criterios. En D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Métodos psicológicos en la investigación y pruebas criminales (pp. 189-211). Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer. (Publicado originalmente en inglés en 1989 por Springer, Nueva York).
• Stiff, J. B., Miller, G. R., Sleight, C., Mongeau, P., Garlick, R. y Rogan, R. (1989). Explanations for visual cue primacy in judgments of honesty and deceit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 555–564.
• Street, C. N. H. y Masip, J. (2015). The source of the truth bias: Heuristic processing? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 56, 254-263.
• Vrij, A. y Granhag, P. A. (2012). Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the question asked.
• Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 110-117.
• Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A. y Porter, S. (2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11, 89-121.
• Vrij, A., Leal, S., Granhag, P. A., Mann, S., Fisher, R., Hillman, J. y Sperry, K. (2009). Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 159-166.
• Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S. y Fisher, R. (2012). Imposing cognitive load to elicit cues to deceit: Inducing the reverse order technique naturally. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 579-594.
• Vrij, A., Mann, S., Fisher, R., Leal, S., Milne, B. y Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 253-265.
• Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S. y Fisher, R. (2010). ‘Look into my eyes’: can an instruction to maintain eye contact facilitate lie detection? Psychology, Crime & Law, 16, 327-348.
• Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S. y Fisher, R. (2012). Is anyone there? Drawings as a tool to detect deceit in occupation interviews. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 377-388.
• Walczyk, J. J., Griffith, D. A., Yates, R., Visconte, S. R., Simoneaux, B. y Harris, L. L. (2012). Lie detection by inducing cognitive load. Eye movements and other cues to the false answers of “witnesses” to crimes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 887-909.
• Walczyk, J. J., Harris, L. L., Duck, T. K. y Mulay, F. (2014). A social-cognitive framework for understanding serious lies: Activation-decision-construction-action theory. New Ideas in Psychology, 34, 22-36.
• Walczyk, J. J., Mahoney, K. T., Doverspike, D. y GriffithRoss, D. A. (2009). Cognitive lie detection: Response time and consistency of answers as cues to deception. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 33-49.
• Walczyk, J. J., Roper, K. S., Seemann, E. y Humphrey, A. M. (2003). Cognitive mechanisms underlying lying to questions: Response time as a cue to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 755-774.
• Walczyk, J. J., Schwartz, J. P., Clifton, R., Adams, B., Wei, M. y Zha, P. (2005). Lying person to person about life events: A cognitive framework for lie detection. Personnel Psychology, 58, 141-170.
• Yeschke, C. L. (1997). The art of investigative interviewing: A human approach to testimonial evidence. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.