Governance in educational institutions in Portugal

  1. García Redondo, Eva 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Zeitschrift:
NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

ISSN: 2254-7339

Datum der Publikation: 2016

Ausgabe: 5

Nummer: 1

Seiten: 17-22

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.7821/NAER.2016.1.156 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research

Zusammenfassung

The present study addresses the governance processes governing the organization and management of educational institutions in Portugal, in a context of analysis in which the educational reforms carried out in this country, from the early nineteenth century (when school responsibility is assumed exclusively by the State) to the present, play what we estimate a central role. It is in response to this reality, on the basis of which we study their meaning and state. Evaluation, privatization and autonomy are the vectors which, we believe, provide the frame for a market speech in which we intend to emphasize, considering, on the one hand, that the management of education is conditioned by political developments and interests, of one kind or another, and, on the other hand, that the evolution of governance in its various institutions, although in progress, is gradually adapting to the standards set down at European level in varying degrees of intensity.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Amaral, A., Tavares, O., & Santos, C. (2013). Higher Education reform in Portugal: a historical and comparative perspective of the New Legal framework for Public Universities. Higher Education Policy, 26, 5-24. doi:10.1057/hep.2012.29
  • Azevedo, J. (2004). Reforma educativa y gobernabilidad de la educación. En E. Tenti (Ed.), Gobernabilidad de los sistemas educativos en América Latina (pp. 275-300). Buenos Aires: IIPE–UNESCO.
  • Ball, S. J. (2008). New Philantropy, new networks and new governance in education. Political Studies, 56, 747-765. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00722.x
  • Barroso, J. (2004). La autonomía de las escuelas en el contexto de cambio de los modos de regulación de las políticas y de la acción educativa: el caso portugués. Revista de Educación, 333, 117-140.
  • Barroso, J. (2009). A utilização do conhecimento em política: O caso da Gestão escolar em Portugal. Revista Educação Social, Campinas, 30, 987–1007. doi:10.1590/S0101-73302009000400004
  • Delors, J. (1996). La educación encierra un tesoro. Informe a la UNESCO de la Comisión Internacional sobre la Educación para el siglo XXI. París: UNESCO/Santillana.
  • Díaz Gibson, J., Cívis Zaragoza, M., Cortada Pujol, M., & Carrillo Álvarez, E. (2015). El liderazgo y la gobernanza colaborativa en proyectos educativos comunitarios. Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria, 26, 59-83. doi:10.7179/PSRI_2015.26.03
  • EURYDICE (2012). Key Data on Higher Education in Europe. 2012 Edition. Retrieved from: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/key_data_series/105en.pdf
  • EURYDICE (2010a). The estructure of the european education systems 2010/2011: schematic diagrams. Bruselas: Eurydice.
  • EURYDICE (2010b). Compulsory education in Europe. Bruselas: Eurydice. Forum Português de Administração Educacional (2006). Retrieved from: http://www2.fpce.ul.pt/org/fpae//coloquioautarquiaseducacao.htm
  • Decreto-Lei n.º 221/74, 27 de mayo, Comissões de Gestão (Diario da República, 27 de mayo de 1976). Decreto-Lei nº 208/2002, 17 de octubre, Organização do Ministério da Educação. (Diario da República, nº 240, 17 de octubre de 2002).
  • Decreto-Lei nº 75/2008, 22 de abril, autonomia, administração e gestão dos estabelecimentos públicos da educação pré -escolar e dos ensinos básico e secundário (Diario da República, nº 77, 22 de abril de 2008).
  • Formosinho, J., & Machado, J. (2000). A administração das escolas no Portugal democrático. In J. Formosinho et al. (Eds.), Políticas educativas e autonomia das escolas (pp. 31-64). Oporto: Asa.
  • García, E., & Martín, S. (2014). Governance and Governability Processes in Higher Education Teacher Training Institutes in Portugal. In R. Verdugo (Ed.), Educational reform in Europe. History, Culture and Ideology (pp. 119-152). Charlotte NC: information Age Publishing.
  • Grancho, J. (2009). Avaliação e autonomia das escolas. In J. Ruivo & A. Trigueiros (Eds.), Avaliação de desempenho dos professores (pp. 23-32). Castelo Branco: RVG Editors.
  • Grek, F. (2010). International Organisations and the Shared Construction of Policy ‘Problems’: Problematisation and Change in Education Governance in Europe. In European Educational Research Journal, 9(3), 396-406. doi:10.2304/eerj.2010.9.3.396
  • Kooiman, J. (2000). Societal governance: Levels, models, and orders of social political interaction. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy (pp. 138–164). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1017/S000305540281036X
  • Lei nº 85/2009, 27 de agosto, régimen da escolaridade obrigatoria para crianças e jovens em idade escolar (Diario da República, nº166, 27 de agosto de 2009).
  • Lei nº46/86, 14 de octubre, Bases do Sistema Educativo (Diario da República, nº237, 14 de octubre de 1986).
  • Magalhães, A., & Santiago, R. (2012). Governance, public management and Administration of Higher Education in Portugal. In G. Neave & A. Amaral (Eds.), Higher education in Portugal (1974-2009). A nation, a generation (pp. 227-247). Dodrecht: Springer. doi:10.1057/hep.2012.31
  • Magalhães, A., Veiga, A., Amaral, A., Sousa, S., & Ribeiro, F. (2013). Governance of governance in higher education: practices and lesson drawn from the portuguese case. Higher Education Quarterly, 67, 295-311. doi:10.1111/hequ.12021
  • Magalhães, A., Veiga, A., Ribeiro, F., & Amaral, A. (2013). Governance and Institucional Autonomy: governing and governance in Portugues Higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 26, 241-262. doi:10.1057/hep.2012.31
  • Maroy, C. (2008). The new regulation forms of educational systems in Europe: Towars a post-bureaucratic regime. In N. Soguel, N. & P. Jaccard (Eds.), Governance and Performance of Education Systems (pp. 13-35). The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6446-3
  • Neave, G., & Amaral, A. (2012). Higher education in Portugal (1974-2009). A nation, a generation. Dodrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-2135-7
  • Neto-Mendes, A. (2004). Regulação estatal, auto-regulação e regulação pelo mercado: subsídios para o estudo da profissão docente. In J. A. Costa, A. NetoMendes, & A. Ventura (Eds.), Políticas e Gestão Local da Educação (pp. 2333). Aveiro: Universidade de Aveiro.
  • Nóvoa, A., Alves, N., & Canário, R. (2000). Discourses on educational policy in an uncertainty context. In S. Lindblad, & T. S. Popkewitz (Eds.), Public discourses on education governance and social integration and exclusion: Analyses of policy texts in European contexts (pp. 124-144). Uppsala: Uppsala University, Department of Education.
  • OECD (2008). PISA 2006: Volume 2: Data. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264040151-en
  • Pedró, F. (1993). Estado y educación en Europa y los Estados Unidos. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 1, 1-28.
  • Pedrosa, J. (2014). Autonomy and Accountability in University Governance. In S. Bergan, E. Egron–Polak, J. Kohler, & Purser, L. (Eds.), Leadership and Governance in Higher Education, Handbook for decisión. Makers and administrators, supplement volumen nº 01. Berlín: Raabe Academic Publishers.
  • Pedrosa, J., Costa, H., Mano, M., & Gaspar, T. (2014). Governança da Educação Superiorcontextos e processos de mudança em Portugal. Revista FORGES, Fórum da Gestão do Ensino Superiornos paises e regioes de língua portuguesa, 1(1), 87-107. doi:10.14195/2183-2722_1-1_4
  • Peña Argibay, J. (2000). De la escuela a la vida activa dentro del seno de la Unión Europea: programas de transición y formación profesional inicial. Santiago de Compostela: Centro Europeo Atlántico.
  • Popkewitz, TH. S. (2013). Pisa: números, estandarización de la conducta y la alquimia de las materias escolares. Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 17(2), 47-64.
  • Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2007). Models of Network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 1-33. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015
  • Robertson, L., Mundy, K., Verger A., & Menashy, F. (2012). Public/private partnerships in education. USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:10.4337/9780857930699
  • Rodriguez Martínez, C. (2014). La contra-reforma educative en España: políticas educativas neoliberales y nuevos modelos de gestión. Revista Interuniversiatria de Formación de Profesorado, 81(28.3), 15-29.
  • Sánchez Ferrer, L. (1996). Las relaciones entre la gobernabilidad democrática y el sistema educativo: un estado de la cuestión. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 12, 79-103.
  • Santiago, P., Tremblay K., Basri, E., & Arnal, E. (2008). Tertiary Education for the Knowlegde Society. OCDE: París. doi:10.1787/9789264046535-en
  • Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234-258. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01753.x
  • OECD (2012). Pisa 2012 results. What students know and can do. doi:10.1787/9789264201132-en Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results.htm
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet