¿Existen indicadores para identificar el talento?

  1. GONZÁLEZ ASTUDILLO, María Teresa 1
  2. DOMINGUES CARLOS, Fernando Sergio 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Revista:
Aula: Revista de Pedagogía de la Universidad de Salamanca

ISSN: 0214-3402

Año de publicación: 2015

Título del ejemplar: Los talentos en la educación

Número: 21

Páginas: 21-32

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.14201/AULA2015212132 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Aula: Revista de Pedagogía de la Universidad de Salamanca

Resumen

A lo largo de las últimas décadas los investigadores han aportado diferentes aproximaciones de la noción de talento desde diferentes perspectivas diferenciándolo de otros conceptos como superdotado, experto, genio u otros similares. En estas páginas intentaremos describir de forma sucinta las diferentes definiciones que han surgido durante estos últimos años así como dar una muestra de algunos de los indicadores que se considera que caracterizan a los sujetos que poseen algún talento.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ADAMS, J. S. (1963) Towards an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0040968
  • AMABILE, T. M. (1983) The Social Psychology of Creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5533-8
  • AMABILE, T. M. (1996) Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder: Westview Press.
  • CASTELLÓ, A. y BATTLE, C. (1998) Aspectos teóricos e instrumentales en la identificación del alumno superdotado y talentoso. Propuesta de un protocolo. faisca, 6, 26-66. Santiago de Compostela.
  • CHI, M. T. H. (2006) Laboratory methods for assessing experts’ and novices’ knowledge. En K. Anders Ericsson, Neil Charness, Robert R. Hoffman y Paul J. Feltovich (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 167-184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.010
  • CIANCIOLO, A. T.; Matthew, C.; Sternberg, R. J. y Wagner, R. K. (2006) Tacit knowledge, practical intelligence, and expertise. En K. Anders ERICSSON, Neil CHARNESS, Robert R. HOFFMAN y Paul J. FELTOVICH (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 613-632). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.035
  • DECI, E. L. y RYAN, R. M. (1985) Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
  • ERICSSON, K. A. (2009) Enhancing the development of professional performance: implications from the study of deliberate practice. En K. A. ERICSSON (ed.) Development of professional expertise toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments (pp. 405-431). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609817.022
  • ERICSSON, K. A.; KRAMPE, R. T. y TESCH-RÖMER, C. (1993) The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
  • ERICSSON, K. A. y LEHMANN, A. C. (1996) Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.273
  • ERICSSON, K. A. y LEHMANN, A. C. (1999) Expertise. En M. A. Runco y S. R. Pritzker (eds.) Encyclopedia of Creativity, vol. 1 (pp. 695-707). San Diego: Academic Press.
  • ERICSSON, K. A.; RORING, R. W. y NANDAGOPAL, K. (2007) Giftedness and evidence for reproducibly superior performance: An account based on the expert performance framework. High Ability Studies, 18 (1), 3-56.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13598130701350593
  • GAGNÉ, F. (1985) Giftedness and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29 (3), 103-112.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001698628502900302
  • GLADWELL, M. (2008) Outliers. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
  • GUILFORD, J. P. (1950) Creativity. American Psychologist, 5 (9), 444-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
  • MARTÍNEZ, M. y GUIRADO, A. (coords.); Prieto, A.; Reverter, R.; Ruiz, N. y Valera, M. (2012) Altas capacidades intelectuales. Pautas de actuación, orientación, intervención y evaluación en el periodo escolar. Barcelona: Editorial Graó.
  • PLUCKER, J. A. y RENZULLI, J. S. (1999) Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. En R. J. STERNBERG (ed.) Handbook of creativity (pp. 35-61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • PLUCKER, J. A.; RUNCO, M. A. y LIM, W. (2006) Predicting ideational behavior from divergent thinking and discretionary time on task. Creativity Research Journal, 18 (1), 55-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_7
  • PRIETO, M. D. y CASTEJÓN, J. L. (2000) Los superdotados: esos alumnos excepcionales. Málaga: Ediciones Aljibe S. L.
  • RENZULLI, J. S. (1978) What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Recuperado el 11 de marzo de 2014, de http://www.mishawaka.k12.in.us/documents/HA%20docs/EDPS%20 540%20articles/Module%201%20-%202%20(January%2026)/Renzulli.pdf.
  • RUNCO, M. A. (1991) Divergent thinking. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • RUNCO, M. A. (1993) Divergent thinking, creativity, and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 16-22.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001698629303700103
  • RYAN, R. M. y DECI, E. L. (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25 (1), 54-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  • STERNBERG, R. J. (1999) Intelligence as developing expertise. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 359-375.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0998
  • STERNBERG, R. J. (2001) What is the common thread of creativity? Its dialectical relation to intelligence and wisdom. American Psychologist, 56 (4), 360-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.360
  • STERNBERG, R. J. (2005) wics: A model of leadership. The Psychologist Manager Journal, 8 (1), 29-43.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15503461tpmj0801_4
  • TORRANCE, E. P. (1988) The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. En R. J. Sternberg (ed.) The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 43-75). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
  • TORRANCE, E. P. (1992) The beyonders in a thirty year longitudinal study of creative achievement. Roeper Review, 15 (3), 131-135.
  • TORRANCE, E. P. (1993) Understanding creativity: Where to start? Psychological Inquiry, 4 (3), 232-234.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0403_17
  • VANLEHN, K. y VAN DE SANDE, B. (2009) Acquiring conceptual expertise from modeling: the case of elementary physics. En K. A. ERICSSON (ed.) Development of professional expertise toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments (pp. 356-378). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609817.020
  • VROOM, V. H. (1964) Work and Motivation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • WILLIAMS, K. C. y WILLIAMS, C. C. (2011) Five key ingredients for improving student motivation. Research in Higher Education Journal, 12, 104-122.
  • ZIMMERMAN, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview. Educational Psychologist, 25 (1), 3-17.
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609817.020
  • ZIMMERMAN, B. J. (2002) Achieving academic excellence: A self-regulatory perspective. En Michel FERRARI (ed.) The Pursuit of Excellence Through Education (pp. 85-111). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • ZIMMERMAN, B. J. (2006) Development and adaptation of expertise: The role of self-regulatory processes and beliefs. En K. Anders ERICSSON, Neil CHARNESS, Robert R. HOFFMAN y Paul
  • J. FELTOVICH (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 705722). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.039