Propiedades psicométricas de la adaptación peruana de la prueba de pensamiento crítico PENCRISAL

  1. Silvia F Rivas
  2. Patricia Morales Bueno
  3. Carlos Saiz
Journal:
Avaliaçao Psicologica: Interamerican Journal of Psychological Assessment

ISSN: 2175-3431 1677-0471

Year of publication: 2014

Volume: 13

Issue: 2

Pages: 257-268

Type: Article

More publications in: Avaliaçao Psicologica: Interamerican Journal of Psychological Assessment

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to study, in Peruvian population, the psychometric properties of the critical thinking test, PENCRISAL, originally developed and validated in Spanish population. 422 students of Science and Engineering of a Peruvian university participated voluntarily answering the test. Reliability was analyzed with Cronbach's alpha; interrater reliability was studied by mean of Cohen's Kappa coefficients for each of the items; construct validity was analyzed with Factor Analysis of Principal Components, Varimax method. Finally, divergent validity was studied by mean of the correlations with other tests through Pearson coefficient. It is concluded that PENCRISAL test fits with the psychometric requirements for the assessment of critical thinking skills in Peruvian population.

Bibliographic References

  • Arum, R, Roksa, J. (2011). Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
  • Bensley, D. A, Crowe, D. S, Bernhardt, P, Buckner, C, Allman, A. L. (2010). Teaching and Assessing Critical Thinking Skills for Argument Analysis in Psychology. Teaching of Psychology. 37. 91-96
  • Detterman, D. K, Sternberg, R. J. (1982). Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction. Ablex. Norwood^eNJ NJ.
  • Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical thinking. Prentice-Hall. Upper Saddle River^eNJ NJ.
  • Facione, P. A. (2011). Think critically. Prentice Hall. New York.
  • Halpern, D. (1998). American PsychologistTeaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. 53. 449-455
  • Halpern, D. (2003). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. 4a. ed. Erlbaum. New Jersey.
  • Poveda, I. L. (2010). Formación de pensamiento crítico en estudiantes de primeros semestres de educación superior. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación. 53.
  • Rivas, S.F, Saiz, C. (2012). Validación y propiedades psicométricas de la prueba de pensamiento crítico PENCRISAL. Revista Electrónica de Metodología Aplicada. 17. 18-34
  • Saiz, C. (1994). Evaluación curricular: Una guía para la intervención psicopedagógica. Siglo XXI. Madrid. 613-689
  • Saiz, C. (2002). Enseñar o aprender a pensar. Escritos de Psicología. 6. 53-72
  • Saiz, C, Rivas, S.F. (2008). Intervenir para transferir en pensamiento crítico. Praxis. 10. 129-149
  • Saiz, C, Rivas, S. (2008). Evaluación en pensamiento crítico: una propuesta para diferenciar formas de pensar. Ergo, Nueva Época. 25-66
  • Saiz, C, Rivas, S.F. (2011). Evaluation of the ARDESOS program: an initiative to improve critical thinking skills. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 11. 34-51
  • Saiz, C, Rivas, S.F. (2012). Pensamiento crítico y aprendizaje basado en problemas. Revista de Docencia Universitaria. 10. 325-346
  • Thurstone, L.L, Thurstone, T.G. (1976). PMA: Aptitudes Mentales Primarias. TEA. Madrid.
  • Walton, D. (2006). Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge^eUK UK.