Target leverage and speed of adjustment along the life cycle of Eurpean listed firms

  1. Paula Castro 12
  2. María Teresa Tascón Fernández 1
  3. Borja Amor-Tapia 1
  4. Alberto de Miguel 2
  1. 1 Universidad de León
    info

    Universidad de León

    León, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02tzt0b78

  2. 2 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Revista:
Business Research Quarterly

ISSN: 2340-9444,  2340-9436

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 19

Número: 3

Páginas: 188-205

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.BRQ.2016.01.003 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openBULERIA editor

Otras publicaciones en: Business Research Quarterly

Resumen

Este documento analiza las diferencias en el apalancamiento objetivo y la velocidad de ajuste en tres etapas del ciclo de vida de las empresas europeas cotizadas: introducción, crecimiento y madurez. Determinamos que la rentabilidad y la tangibilidad son los determinantes más estables, mientras que las oportunidades de crecimiento y el tamaño exhiben efectos cambiantes en todas las etapas. La velocidad del ajuste no aumenta a medida que las empresas evolucionan, ya que las empresas que se inician son las que pueden adaptarse más rápidamente. Las empresas que cambian de etapa ajustan el apalancamiento a menor velocidad y su objetivo se ve más afectado por la rentabilidad, principalmente cuando el cambio es de crecimiento a madurez. Finalmente, confirmamos la existencia de objetivos de endeudamiento a largo plazo, proporcionando evidencia de que el objetivo del próximo año es un factor relevante para explicar la deuda actual cuando las empresas cambian de una etapa a otra.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (ECO2011-29144-C03-01) and support from the University of Leon (ULE2012-1) are gratefully acknowledged. Paula Castro also acknowledges the Grant FPU (AP2012-1959) from the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arellano M. Panel Data Econometrics 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Arellano M., Bover O. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J. Econom. 1995, 68(1):29-51.
  • Aybar-Arias C., Casino-Martínez A., López-Gracia J. On the adjustment speed of SMEs to their optimal capital structure. Small Bus. Econ. 2012, 39(4):977-996.
  • Baltagi B.H. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data 2005, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
  • Barclay M.J., Smith C.W. The capital structure puzzle: another look at the evidence. J. Appl. Corp. Finance 1999, 12(1):8-20.
  • Blundell R., Bond S. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econom. 1998, 87(1):115-143.
  • Bulan T., Yan Z. Firm maturity and the pecking order theory. Int. J. Bus. Econ. 2010, 9(3):179-200.
  • Byoun S. How and when do firms adjust their capital structures toward targets?. J. Finance 2008, 63(6):3069-3096.
  • Castro P., Tascón M.T., Amor-Tapia B. Dynamic analysis of the capital structure in technological firms based on their life cycle stages. Span. J. Finance Account. 2015, 44(4):458-486.
  • Chang X., Dasgupta S. Target behavior and financing: how conclusive is the evidence?. J. Finance 2009, 64(4):1767-1796.
  • Cho S.S., El Ghoul S., Guedhami O., Suh J. Creditor rights and capital structure: evidence from international data. J. Corp. Finance 2014, 25(April):40-60.
  • Cook D.O., Tang T. Macroeconomic conditions and capital structure adjustment speed. J. Corp. Finance 2010, 16(1):73-87.
  • Delmas M., Marcus A. Firms' choice of regulatory instruments to reduce pollution: a transaction cost approach. Bus. Polit. 2004, 6(3):1-20.
  • Dickinson V. Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle. Account. Rev. 2011, 86(6):1969-1994.
  • Djankov S., Hart O.D., McLiesh C., Shleifer A. Debt enforcement around the world. J. Polit. Econ. 2008, 116(6):1105-1149.
  • Drobetz W., Pensa P., Wanzenried G. Firm characteristics, economic conditions and capital structure adjustments? Working Paper 2007, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Drobetz W., Wanzenried G. What determines the speed of adjustment to the target capital structure?. Appl. Financ. Econ. 2006, 16(13):941-958.
  • Elsas R., Florysiak D. Heterogeneity in the speed of adjustment toward target leverage. Int. Rev. Finance 2011, 11(2):181-211.
  • Fama E.F., French K.R. Industry costs of equity. J. Financ. Econ. 1997, 43(2):153-193.
  • Fama E.F., French K.R. Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt. Rev. Financ. Stud. 2002, 15(1):1-33.
  • Faulkender M., Flannery M.J., Watson K., Smith J.M. Cash flows and leverage adjustments. J. Financ. Econ. 2012, 103(3):632-646.
  • Fischer E.O., Heinkel R., Zechner J. Dynamic capital structure choice: theory and tests. J. Finance 1989, 44(1):19-40.
  • Flannery M.J., Rangan K.P. Partial adjustment toward target capital structures. J. Financ. Econ. 2006, 79(3):469-506.
  • Frank M.Z., Goyal V.K. Trade off and pecking order theories of debt. Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance 2008, Vol. 2:135-202. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  • Frank M.Z., Goyal V.K. Capital structure decisions: which factors are reliably important?. Financ. Manag. 2009, 38(1):1-37.
  • Frelinghaus A., Mostert B., Firer C. Capital structure and the firm's life stage. S. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 2005, 36(4):9-18.
  • González V.M., González F. Influence of bank concentration and institutions on capital structure: new international evidence. J. Corp. Finance 2008, 14(4):363-375.
  • González V.M., González F. Firm size and capital structure: evidence using dynamic panel data. Appl. Econ. 2012, 44(36):4745-4754.
  • Hackbarth D., Miao J., Morellec E. Capital structure, credit risk, and macroeconomic conditions. J. Financ. Econ. 2006, 82(3):519-550.
  • Hirsch J., Walz U. Financing decisions along a firm's life-cycle: debt as a commitment device. Eur. Financ. Manag. 2011, 17(5):898-927.
  • Hsiao C. Analysis of Panel Data 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Hovakimian A., Li G. Do firms have unique target debt ratios to which they adjust? Working Paper April 2009, Baruch College.
  • Hovakimian A., Li G. In search of conclusive evidence: how to test for adjustment to target capital structure. J. Corp. Finance 2011, 17(1):33-44.
  • Hovakimian A., Opler T., Titman S. The debt-equity choice. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 2001, 36:1-24.
  • Huang R., Ritter J.R. Testing theories of capital structure and estimating the speed of adjustment. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 2009, 44(2):237-271.
  • Jalilvand A., Harris R.S. Corporate behavior in adjusting to capital structure and dividend targets: an econometric study. J. Finance 1984, 39(1):127-145.
  • La Rocca M., La Rocca T., Cariola A. Capital structure decisions during a firm's life cycle. Small Bus. Econ. 2011, 37(1):107-130.
  • Laeven L., Valencia F. Systemic banking crises database. IMF Econ. Rev. 2013, 61(2):225-270.
  • LaPorta R., Lopez de Silanes F., Shleifer A. The economic consequences of legal origins. J. Econ. Lit. 2008, 46(2):285-332.
  • Leary M.T., Roberts M. Do firms rebalance their capital structures?. J. Finance 2005, 60(6):2575-2619.
  • Miguel A., Pindado J. Determinants of capital structure: new evidence from Spanish panel data. J. Corp. Finance 2001, 7(1):77-99.
  • Miller D., Friesen P.H. A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Manag. Sci. 1984, 30(10):1161-1183.
  • Mueller D. A life cycle theory of the firm. J. Ind. Econ. 1972, 20(3):199-219.
  • Myers S. Determinants of corporate borrowing. J. Financ. Econ. 1977, 5:147-175.
  • Myers S.C. The capital structure puzzle. J. Finance 1984, 39(3):575-592.
  • Öztekin Ö., Flannery M.J. Institutional determinants of capital structure adjustment speeds. J. Financ. Econ. 2012, 103(1):88-112.
  • Pfaffermayr M., Stöckl M., Winner H. Capital structure, corporate taxation and firm age. Fisc. Stud. 2013, 34(1):109-135.
  • Rajan R.G., Zingales L. What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. J. Finance 1995, 50(5):1421-1460.
  • Roodman D. How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata J. (StataCorp LP) 2009, 9(1):86-136.
  • Ross S. The determination of financial structure: the incentive signaling approach. Bell J. Econ. 1977, 8(1):23-40.
  • Rubio G., Sogorb F. The adjustment to target leverage of Spanish public firms: macroeconomic conditions and distance from target. Rev. Econ. Apl. 2011, 19(57):35-63.
  • Rubio G., Sogorb F. Adjustment costs and the realization of target leverage of Spanish public firms. Span. J. Finance Account. 2012, 41(156):547-564.
  • Saddour K. The determinants and the value of cash holdings: evidence from French firms. Working Paper 2006-6 2006, 1-33. CEREG.
  • Shyam-Sunder L., Myers S.C. Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure. J. Financ. Econ. 1999, 51(2):219-244.
  • Teixeira G., Santos M.J. Do Firms Have Financing Preferences Along Their Life Cycles? Evidence from Iberia 2014, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=676869.
  • Titman S., Tsyplakov S. A dynamic model of optimal capital structure. Rev. Financ. Stud. 2007, 11(3):401-451.
  • Titman S., Wessels R. The determinants of capital structure choice. J. Finance 1988, 43(1):1-21.
  • Welch I. Two common problems in capital structure research: the financial-debt-to-asset ratio and issuing activity versus leverage changes. Int. Rev. Finance 2011, 11(1):1-17.
  • Wooldridge J.M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data 2002, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet