Influencia del estilo de aprendizaje y del tipo de tarea en los procesos de búsqueda en línea de estudiantes universitarios

  1. María José Hernández Serrano
  2. Sara Serate González
  3. Rosalynn A. Campos Ortuño
Revue:
Investigación bibliotecológica

ISSN: 2448-8321 0187-358X

Année de publication: 2015

Volumen: 29

Número: 65

Pages: 115-136

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.IBBAI.2016.02.017 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Investigación bibliotecológica

Résumé

Students' online search processes are variable in terms of the speed and the amount of information they need to consult. These two quantitative variables may be determined either by cognitive preferences or by the specific context of the task as required by the teacher. This study empirically analyzes how the online search processes of ninety-two students vary depending on the task type (Taylor, 1991), or alternatively as a function of four learning style preferences (Honey & Mumford, 1986). The results show that students tend to proceed according to their preferences. Moreover, the reflective style always exhibits the same procedure regardless of task type. From the pedagogical standpoint, this process-based preference over a result-based approach argues for the design of tasks with attention to learning styles as essential in order to optimize learning through online information resources.

Références bibliographiques

  • Alonso, C., Gallego, D., Honey, P.. (1994). Los estilos de aprendizaje. Procedimientos y diagnóstico y mejora. 7. Mensajero. Bilbao.
  • Barajas, M., Higueras, E.. (2003). Minerva seeks Project.
  • Blake, C., Pratt, W.. (2006). Collaborative information synthesis II: Recommendations for information systems to support synthesis activities. JASIST. 57. 1888-1895
  • Byström, K., Hansen, P.. (2005). Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies. JASIST. 56. 1050-1061
  • Byström, K.. (2007). Approaches to 'task' in contemporary information studies. Information Research. 12. 26
  • Campbell, D. J.. (1988). Task complexity: a review and analysis. Academy of Management Review. 13. 40-52
  • Chevalier, A., Kicka, M.. (2006). Web designers and web users: Influence of ergonomic quality of the web site on the information search. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 64. 1031-1048
  • De Moya, M. V., Hernández, J. R., Hernández, J. A., Cózar, R.. (2011). Análisis de los estilos de aprendizaje y las TIC en la formación personal del alumnado universitario a través del cuestionario reatic. Revista de Investigación Educativa. 29. 137-156
  • Hernández Serrano, M. J.. (2009). Estrategias de búsqueda de información para la generación de conocimiento en la Red.
  • Hervás, R.. (2003). Estilos de enseñanza y aprendizaje en escenarios educativos. Grupo Editorial Universitario. Granada.
  • Honey, P., Mumford, A.. (1986). The Manual of Learning Styles. Perter Honey Publications. Maidenhead.
  • Hölscher, C., Strube, G.. (2000). Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies. Computer Networks. 33. 337-346
  • Hughes, B., Wareham, J., Joshi, I.. (2010). Doctors' online information needs, cognitive search strategies, and judgments of information quality and cognitive authority: How predictive judgments introduce bias into cognitive search models. JASIST. 61. 433-452
  • Hyldegård, J., Ingwersen, P.. (2007). Task complexity and information behavior in group based problem solving. Information Research. 12. 27
  • Jansen, B., Booth, D., Smith, B.. (2009). Using the taxonomy of cognitive learning to model online searching. Information Processing & Management. 45. 643-663
  • Kellar, M., Watters, C., Shepherd, M.. (2007). A field study characterizing Web-based information-seeking tasks. JASIST. 58. 999-1018
  • Kelly, D.. (2006). Measuring online information seeking context, Part 2: Findings and discussion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57. 1862-1874
  • Kelly, D., Sugimoto, C. R.. (2013). A Systematic review of interactive information retrieval evaluation studies, 1967-2006. JASIST. 64. 745-770
  • Kim, J.. (2009). Describing and predicting information-seeking behavior on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60. 679-693
  • Kolb, D. A.. (1984). Experiential Learning experience as a source of learning and development. Prentice Hall. ^eNew Jersey New Jersey.
  • Madden, A. D., Eaglestone, B., Ford, N. J., Whittle, M.. (2006). Search engines: a first step to finding information: preliminary findings from a study of observed searches. Information Research. 12. 294
  • Li, Y., Belkin, N. J.. (2010). An exploration of the relationships between work task and interactive information search behavior. JASIST. 61. 1771-1789
  • Liegle, J., Janicki, T.. (2006). The effect of learning styles on the navigation needs of Web-based learners. Computer in Human Behavior. 22. 885-898
  • Limberg, L.. (2007). Learning assignment as task in information seeking research. Information Research. 12.
  • Prensky, M.. (2008). The role of technology in teaching and the classroom. Educational Technology. 48.
  • Pujol, L.. (2008). Búsqueda de información en hipermedios: efecto del estilo de aprendizaje y el uso de estrategias metacognitivas. Investigación y Postgrado. 23. 45-67
  • Reed, W., Oughton, J., Ayersman, D., Ervin, Jr. J., Giessler, S.. (2000). Computer experience, learning style, and hypermedia navigation. Computer in Human Behavior. 16. 609-628
  • Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Williams, P., Huntington, P., Fieldhouse, M., Gunter, B., Tenopir, C.. (2008). The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future. Aslib Proceedings. 60. 290-310
  • Sternberg, R.. (2008). Estilo de pensamiento. Claves para identificar nuestro modo de pensar y enriquecer nuestra capacidad de reflexión. Paidós Ibérica. Barcelona.
  • Sternberg, R. J., Zhang, L.-F.. (2009). Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles. Lawrence Erlbaum. Mahwah^eNJ NJ.
  • Suárez, F., Buey, F., Diez, J.. (2000). Estilos y estrategias de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios. Psicothema. 12. 615-622
  • Taylor, R. S.. (1991). Progress in communication science. Ablex. Norwood^eNJ NJ.
  • Thatcher, A.. (2008). Web search strategies: The influence of Web experience and task type. Information Processing y Management. 44. 1308-1329
  • Villalustre, L., Del Moral, M. E.. (2011). E-actividades en el contexto virtual de Ruralnet: satisfacción de los estudiantes con diferentes estilos de aprendizaje. Educación XXI. 14. 223-243
  • Willoughby, T., Anderson, S., Wood, E., Mueller, J., Ross, C.. (2009). Fast searching for information on the Internet to use in a learning context: The impact of domain knowledge. Computers & Education. 52. 640-648
  • Wilson, T. D.. (2000). Human Information Behaviour. Information Science. 3. 49-55
  • Xie, I.. (2009). Dimensions of tasks: influences on information-seeking and retrieving processes. Journal of Documentation. 65. 339-366