Identificación de un cadáver a través de los implantes dentales

  1. Esther García Sánchez
  2. Secundino Vicente González
Revista:
Revista española de medicina legal: órgano de la Asociación Nacional de Médicos Forenses

ISSN: 0377-4732

Ano de publicación: 2018

Volume: 44

Número: 3

Páxinas: 131-133

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.1016/J.REML.2018.01.002 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Outras publicacións en: Revista española de medicina legal: órgano de la Asociación Nacional de Médicos Forenses

Resumo

The case is presented on the identification of a corpse in an advanced state of putrefaction, mummified, and partially skeletonised and with loss of facial features, by studying its dental implants. Identification by dental study is being used in cases of carbonised cadavers, multiple victims, or when it is not possible to proceed with identification using DNA, which is the method of choice par excellence, with the handicap of needing the individual's previous dental records. However, in the case of lacking their own teeth, dental work carried out, dental prostheses or, as in this case, dental implants (type, brand and specific location) could be studied. However, it is essential to identify the material used, databases of commercial firms, and good communication between the professionals involved in identification.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Berketa, J., James, H., & Marino, V. (2011). A pilot study in the recovery and recognition of non-osseointegrated dental implants following cremation. Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology, 29(2), 38-44.
  • Berketa, J., James, H., & Marino, V. (2011). Dental implant changes following incineration. Forensic Science International, 207(1-3), 50-54. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.08.025
  • Berketa, J., James, H., & Marino, V. (2010). Survival of batch numbers within dental implants following incineration as an aid to identification. Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology, 28(1), 1-4.
  • Berketa, J. W., Hirsch, R. S., Higgins, D., & James, H. (2010). Radiographic recognition of dental implants as an aid to identifying the deceased. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 55(1), 66-70. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01226.x
  • Byraki, A., Costea, A. V., Curcǎ, G. C., & Hostiuc, S. (2010). Morphological analysis of dental implants - forensic significance. Romanian Journal of Legal Medicine, 18(3), 207-212. doi:10.4323/rjlm.2010.207
  • De Angelis, D., & Cattaneo, C. (2015). Implant bone integration importance in forensic identification. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 60(2), 505-508. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12640
  • Marín, L., & Moreno, F. (2004). Odontología forense: Identificación, odontológica de individuos quemados, reporte de dos casos. Rev Estomatol, 12, 57-70.
  • Michelinakis, G., Sharrock, A., & Barclay, C. W. (2006). Identification of dental implants through the use of implant recognition software (IRS). International Dental Journal, 56(4), 203-208. doi:10.1111/j.1875-595X.2006.tb00095.x
  • Modesti, L. D. M., Vieira, G. M., Galvão, M. F., & de Amorim, R. F. B. (2014). Human identification by oral prosthesis analysis with probability rates higher than dna analysis. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 59(3), 825-829. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12404
  • Nuzzolese, E., Lusito, S., Solarino, B., & Di Vella, G. (2008). Radiographic dental implants recognition for geographic evaluation in human identification. Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology, 26(1), 8-11.
  • Reesu, G. V., Augustine, J., & Urs, A. B. (2015). Forensic considerations when dealing with incinerated human dental remains. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 29, 13-17. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2014.10.006