Learning from complementary ways of developing experimental competences

  1. LIMA, Natércia Maria 1
  2. VIEGAS, Maria Clara 1
  3. GARCÍA-PEÑALVO, Francisco José 2
  1. 1 Instituto Politécnico do Porto
    info

    Instituto Politécnico do Porto

    Oporto, Portugal

    ROR https://ror.org/04988re48

  2. 2 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Journal:
Education in the knowledge society (EKS)

ISSN: 2444-8729 1138-9737

Year of publication: 2017

Volume: 18

Issue: 1

Pages: 63-74

Type: Article

DOI: 10.14201/EKS20171816374 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Education in the knowledge society (EKS)

Abstract

Engineering education has solid needs of experimental competences development. Nowadays theses competences can be developed not only in traditional laboratories (hands on) but also through the use of computer simulations and remote labs. The use of diversified methods in education and the exploration of new resources and techniques in classroom may allow teachers to motivate more students, and capture their attention due to their different learning styles.The main objective of this thesis project is to better understand the effects on the students’ learning outcomes in different contexts, when subject to similar design approaches using an enquiry-based teaching and learning methodology based on simultaneous use of experimental resources (hands on, simulation and remote labs) together with calculus, in class and assessment. To accomplish this goal, several insights must be taken into consideration, including the teachers’ mediation in each case and the didactical implementations adaptations, but also external factors, such as socio-cultural and/or political factors.

Funding information

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the VISIR Community as well as the financial support provided by the Foundation for Science and Technology Project, FCT UID/EQU/00305/2013. This research work is made within the University of Salamanca PhD Program on Education in the Knowledge Society

Funders

  • Foundation for Science and Technology Project
    • FCT UID/EQU/00305/2013

Bibliographic References

  • Alves, G., Fidalgo, A., Marques, M. A., Viegas, C., Felgueiras, M., Costa, R., . . . Kulesza, W. (2016). Spreading remote labs usage: A System – A Community – A Federation. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE2016). Vila Real, Portugal.
  • Alves, G., Marques, M., Viegas, C., Costa Lobo, M. C., Barral, R., Couto, R., . . . Gustavsson, I. (2011). Using VISIR in a large undergraduate course: Premiminary assessments results. Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).
  • Alves, G., Viegas, C., Lima, N., & Gustavsson, I. (2016). Simultaneous Usage of Methods for the Development of Experimental Competences. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals 7(1), 48-63.
  • Brinson, J. R. (2015). Learning outcome achievment in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical reserach. Computers & Education, 87, 218-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.003
  • Claesson, L., & Hakansson, L. (2012). Using an Online Remote Laboratory for Electrical Experiments in Upper Secondary Education. International Journal of Online Engineering (iJOE), 8 (S2).
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education, 6th Edition. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Corter, J. E., Nickerson, J. V., Esche, S., Chassapis, C., Im, S., & Ma, J. (2007).Constructing reality: A study of remote, hand-on and simulated laboratories. ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction, 14(2).
  • Corter, J., Esche, S., Chassapis, C., Ma, J., & Nickeson, J. (2011). Process and learning outcomes from remotely-operated, simulated and hands-on student laboratories. Computers & Education, 57, 2054-2067.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th Edition. SAGE.
  • Felder, R., & Silverman, L. (1988). Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engineering Education, 78 (7), 674-681.
  • Froyd, J. E., Wankat, P. C., & Smith, K. A. (2012). Five Major Shifts in 100 Years of Engineering Education. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100, 1344-1360.
  • Gustavsson, I., Alves, G., R., C., Nilsson, K., Zackrisson, J., Hernandez-Jayo, U., & Garcia_Zubia, J. (2011). The VISIR Open Lab Platfrom 5.0 - an architecture for a federation of remote laboratories. REV 2011: 8th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation. Brasov, Romania.
  • Jara, C., Candelas, F., Puentes, S., & Torres, F. (2011). Hands-on experiences of undergraduate students in Automatics and Robotics. Computer and Education, 57, 2451-2461.
  • Lima, N., Alves, G., Viegas, C., & Gustavsson, I. (2015). Combined Efforts to develop students experimental competences. Proceedings Exp.at'15 3rd International Experimental Conference. Ponta Delgada, Azores: ACM.
  • Lima, N., Viegas, C., & Garcia-Peñalvo, F. (2016). VISIR’s Usage as a Learning Resource: a Review of the Empirical Research. Proceedings TEEM2016 - Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’16). Salamanca, Spain.
  • Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. (2006). Hands-on, Simulated and Remote Laboratories: A Comparative Literature Review. ACM Computer Surveys, 38 (3).
  • Marques, A., Viegas, C., Costa-Lobo, C., Fidalgo, A., Alves, G., Rocha, J., & Gustavsson, I. (2014). How Remote Labs Impact on Course Outcomes: Various Practises Using VISIR. IEEE-Transactions on Education.
  • Richardson, J. (2011). Approaches to studying, conceptions of learning and learning styles in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 288-293.
  • Sticker, D., Lookabaugh, T., Santos, J., & Barnes, F. (2005). Assessing the effectiveness of remote networking laboratories. 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Indianapolis: IN.
  • Tawfik, M., Sancristobal, E., Martin, S., Gil, C., Pesquera, A., Losada, P., . . . Alves, G. (2011). VISIR deployment in undergraduate engineering practises. Frontiers in Education Conference.
  • Viegas, C., Lima, N., Alves, G., & Gustavsson, I. (2014). Improving students experimental competences using simultaneous methods in class and assessments. TEEEM'14 Proceedings of the second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 125-132). Salamanca, Spain: ACM New York.
  • Williams, C. (2007). Research Methods. Journal of Business & Economic Research, Volume 5, Number 3.