Seduction as instructionthe female author as Pygmalion in long Eighteenth-Century quixotic novels

  1. Miriam Borham Puyal 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Zeitschrift:
Journal of English Studies

ISSN: 1576-6357

Datum der Publikation: 2017

Nummer: 15

Seiten: 7-30

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.18172/JES.3217 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Journal of English Studies

Zusammenfassung

Don Quixote played a crucial role in the shifts in taste and ideology that occurred during the long eighteenth century, being an instrument for authors to validate their own work in contrast with the production of others. New didactic works displayed the need to overcome the romantic supersystem that previous authors offered and even the patriarchal or colonial canon that had been established. The present article will focus on two women writers, Tabitha Tenney and Mary Brunton, who with a story of literary and literal seductions raised their pens against a non-questioned romantic integration in didactic novels and who even converted prior canonical cervantean authors in the origin of their heroines’ quixotism. 

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Ballaster, R. 1992. Seductive Forms: Women’s Amatory Fiction from 1684 to 1740. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Ballaster, R. 2000. “Women and the rise of the novel: sexual prescripts”. Women and Literature in Britain 1700-1800. Ed. Vivien Jones. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 197-216.
  • Bannet, E. T. 2000. The Domestic Revolution. Enlightenment Feminisms and the Novel. Baltimore and London: the Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Bannet, E. T. 2007. “Quixotes, Imitations, and Transatlantic Genres”. Eighteenth- Century Studies 40 (4): 553-569.
  • Borham-Puyal, M. 2012. “Reading Don Quixote as Political Agent: a Spanish Knight in British Ideological and Literary Wars”. ES. Revista de Filología Inglesa 33: 7-25.
  • Borham-Puyal, M. 2013. Quixotic Readers and Quixotic Writers: Cervantes’ Daughters in British Narrative Fiction from Lennox to Austen. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Salamanca: Spain. <http://hdl.handle.net/10366/121340> (Accessed 5 May 2016)
  • Borham-Puyal, M. 2015. Quijotes con enaguas. Encrucijada de géneros en la narrativa británica del XVIII. Valencia: JPM Ediciones.
  • Brown, G. 1999. “The Quixotic Fallacy”. NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction 32 (2): 250-273. Brunton, M. 1811. Self-Control. Edinburgh: Printed for Manners and Miller. Brunton, M. 1819. “Memoir”. Emmeline, with some other pieces. Ed. Alexander Brunton. Edinburgh: Printed for Manners and Miller.
  • Grenby, M. O. 2001. The Anti-Jacobin Novel. British Conservatism and the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hammond, B. 2009. “The Cervantic Legacy in the Eighteenth-Century Novel”. The Cervantean Heritage: Reception and Influence of Cervantes in Britain. Ed. J.A.G. Ardila. London: Legenda. 96-103
  • Kauvar, E. M. 1970. “Jane Austen and The Female Quixote”. Studies in the Novel 2: 211-221.
  • Kerber, L. 1976. “The Republican Mother: Women and the Enlightenment –An American Perspective”. American Quarterly 28: 187-205.
  • Lewis, J. 1987. “The Republican Wife: Virtue and Seduction in the Early Republic”. William and Mary Quarterly 44: 689-721.
  • Motooka, W. 1998. The Age of Reasons. Quixotism, sentimentalism and political economy in eighteenth-century Britain. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Mulford, C. 1996. “Introduction”. The Power of Sympathy and The Coquette. Ed. Carla Mulford. London: Penguin. ix-lii.
  • Pardo, P. J. 1996. “Novel, Romance and Quixotism in Richardson’s Pamela”. Atlantis 18: 306-336.
  • Pardo, P. J. 2005. “La heroína quijotesca en la novela inglesa del siglo XIX: Jane Austen, George Eliot y otros novelistas”. Cervantes y el ámbito anglosajón. Eds. Diego Martínez Torrón. Madrid: Sial. 356-375.
  • Pardo, P. J. 2006. “La tradición cervantina en la novela inglesa: de Henry Fielding a William Thackeray”. Entre Shakespeare y Cervantes: sendas del Renacimiento.. Eds. Z. L. Martínez and L. Gómez Canseco. Newark: Juan de la Cuesta. 73-111.
  • Pardo, P. J. 2007. “El siglo de oro del Quijote en la literatura inglesa, 1740-1840”. La huella de Cervantes y del Quijote en la cultura anglosajona. Eds. José Manuel Barrio Marco and María José Crespo Allué. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid, Secretariado de Publicaciones e Intercambio Editorial. 133-158.
  • Pardo, P. J. Forthcoming. “Don Quijote en el Reino Unido”. Gran Enciclopedia Cervantina. Dir. Carlos Alvar. Madrid: Castalia. <http://hdl.handle. net/10366/118562> (Accessed 5 May 2017)
  • Pearson, J. 1999. Women’s Reading in Britain, 1750-1835: a Dangerous Recreation. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Raff, S. 2006. “Quixotes, Precepts, and Galateas: the Didactic Novel in Eighteenth- century Britain”. Comparative Literature Studies 43 (4): 466-481.
  • Suleiman, S. R. 1993. Authoritarian Fictions: The Ideological Novel as a Literary Genre. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Tenney, T. 1992 (1801). Female Quixotism: Exhibited in the Romantic Opinions and Extravagant Adventures of Dorcasina Sheldon. Eds. J. Nienkamp and A. Collins. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Warner, W. B. 1998. Licensing Entertainment. The Elevation of Novel Reading in Britain, 1684-1750. Berkeley: University of California. West, J. 1802. The Infidel Father. London: Longman and Rees.
  • Wilson, L. M. 2007. “British Women Writing Satirical Novels in the Romantic Period: Gendering Authorship and Narrative Voice”. Romantic Textualities: Literature and Print Culture, 1780-1840 17: 24-46.
  • Wood, L. 2003. Modes of Discipline. Women, Conservatism, and the Novel after the French Revolution. Cranbury, London, Mississauga: Associated University Presses.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet