Comparativa de modelos de experimentación animal en cirugía implantológica

  1. A. López-Valverde Centeno 1
  2. L. Blanco Antona 1
  3. M. Portillo Muñoz 1
  4. R. Rojo López
  5. J. Montero Martín 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Journal:
RCOE: Revista del Ilustre Consejo General de Colegios de Odontólogos y Estomatólogos de España

ISSN: 1138-123X

Year of publication: 2016

Volume: 21

Issue: 1

Pages: 39-46

Type: Article

More publications in: RCOE: Revista del Ilustre Consejo General de Colegios de Odontólogos y Estomatólogos de España

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Objective: comparative study of the dog, rabbit and rat as experimental animal models in order to propose a decision algorithm to choose the best animal for each study. Methods: 5 dogs, 5 rats and 5 rabbits were used. Operators conducted an evaluation test. Furthermore, a search was conducted in PubMed to analyze and compare the use of a particular animal model according to the Objectives of the Revised Study (ORS). Results: the rats were used for evaluation of bone tissue (67.2 percent ORS). Rabbits for evaluating materials (33.7 percent ORS), evaluation of bone tissue (45.2 percent ORS) implant stability (4.1 percent ORS), methods of measuring bone (3.7 percent ORS) infection (1 percent ORS) or the effect of the laser on the implant surface (2.5 percent ORS). Dogs for evaluating materials (31.3 percent ORS), bone tissue (22.9 percent ORS), grafts (8.4 percent ORS) implant loading (6.1 percent ORS ), the technique of placing the implants (6.1 percent ORS), and evaluation of soft tissues (6.1 percent ORS). Conclusions: to choose the most appropriate experimental animal model should consider the study objective, non-operating variables and operating variables.