Legal and cultural factors as catalyst for promoting women in the boardroom

  1. Laura Cabeza-García 1
  2. Esther B. del Brio 2
  3. Carlos Rueda 2
  1. 1 Universidad de León
    info

    Universidad de León

    León, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02tzt0b78

  2. 2 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Revista:
Business Research Quarterly

ISSN: 2340-9444 2340-9436

Año de publicación: 2019

Volumen: 22

Número: 1

Páginas: 56-67

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.BRQ.2018.06.004 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Business Research Quarterly

Resumen

Este estudio se centra en si la regulación y las culturas nacionales desempeñan un papel importante en la definición del papel de la mujer en la sociedad. Estamos contribuyendo al debate existente proporcionando el primer análisis empírico para calibrar qué mecanismos legales y dimensiones culturales son más eficientes para lograr la igualdad de género en la sala de juntas. Hemos resaltado el impacto de la regulación al distinguir entre aquellos países que han aprobado leyes positivas que imponen cuotas de género en la sala de juntas y aquellos que aplican la recomendación de 'cumplir o explicar' en sus códigos de buen gobierno. Hemos monitoreado los niveles de aplicación entre países y probado la validez de los factores culturales de Hofstede en su impacto en las cuotas de género. El panorama emergente es el de la diversidad de género provocada por la adopción de leyes positivas en lugar de recomendaciones blandas. Además, las políticas de diversidad de género se promueven más comúnmente en países donde los gobiernos, corporaciones e instituciones se caracterizan por una menor masculinidad y una menor distancia de poder.

Información de financiación

The authors acknowledge the funding received from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of Spain (projects ECO2013-45615P, ECO2015-63880-R and ECO2015-69058-R).

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adams, R., Ferreira, D., Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Finance Econ. 94 (2009), 291–309.
  • Adams, R., Kirchmeier, T., Making it to the top: from female labor force participation to boardroom gender diversity. Working paper. 2013.
  • Adams, S.M., Flynn, P.M., Local knowledge advances women's access to corporate boards. Corp. Gov. 13:6 (2005), 836–846.
  • Aguilera, R.V., Jackson, G., The cross-national diversity of corporate governance dimensions and determinants. Acad. Manage. J. 28:3 (2003), 447–465.
  • Ahern, K., Dittmar, A., The changing of the boards: the impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Q. J. Econ. 127 (2012), 137–197.
  • Allemand, I., Barbe, O., Brullebaut, B., Institutional theory and gender diversity on European boards. Vie Sci. Entrep. 198:2 (2014), 73–92.
  • Arellano, M., Bond, S., Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econ. Stud. 58:2 (1991), 277–297.
  • Arvey, R.D., Zhang, Z., Avolio, B.J., Krueger, R.F., Developmental and genetic determinants of leadership role occupancy among women. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:3 (2007), 693–706.
  • Aycan, Z., The interplay between cultural and institutional/structural contingencies in human resource management practices. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage. 16 (2005), 1083–1119.
  • Behnam, M., MacLean, T.L., Where is the accountability in international accountability standards? A decoupling perspective. Bus. Ethics Q. 21:1 (2011), 45–72.
  • Bilimoria, D., Wheeler, J.V., Women corporate directors: current research and future directions. Women Manage. Curr. Res. Issues 2:10 (2000), 138–163.
  • Bohman, L., Bygren, M., Edling, C., Surge under threat: the rapid increase of women on Swedish boards of directors. Fagan, C., González-Menéndez, M.C., Gómez-Ansón, S., (eds.) Women on Corporate Boards in Top Management, 2012, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 91–108.
  • Brammer, S., Millington, A., Pavelin, S., Corporate reputation and women on the board. Br. J. Manage. 20:1 (2009), 17–29.
  • Burgess, Z., Tharenou, P., Women board directors: characteristics of the few. J. Bus. Ethics 37 (2002), 39–49.
  • Burke, R.J., Women on Canadian corporate boards of directors: getting the numbers right!. Corp. Gov. 7:4 (1999), 374–378.
  • Burke, R.J., Company size, board size and the number of women directors. Burke, R.J., Mattis, M.C., (eds.) Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Challenges and Opportunities, 2000, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 157–167.
  • Carrasco, A., Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., Laffarga, J., Ruiz-Barbadillo, E., Appointing women to boards: is there a cultural bias?. J. Bus. Ethics 129:2 (2015), 429–444.
  • Carter, D.A., Simkins, B.J., Simpson, W.G., Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financ. Rev. 38 (2003), 33–53.
  • Carter, D.A., D'Souza, F., Simkins, B.J., Simpson, W.G., The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corp. Gov. 18:5 (2010), 396–414.
  • Catalyst, 2012. 2012 Catalyst Census: Fortune 500 women board directors. New York: Catalyst. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/2012-catalyst-census-fortune-500-women-board-directors.
  • Davies Report, Women on boards, 2014 Annual Report, 1-42. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/320000/bis-women-on-boards-2014.pdf, 2014.
  • De Andres, P., Azofra, V., Lopez, F., Corporate boards in OECD countries: size, composition, functioning and effectiveness. Corp. Gov. 13:2 (2005), 197–210.
  • Engelstad, F., Teigen, M., Firms, Boards and Gender Quotas: Comparative Perspectives. 2012, Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK.
  • European Commission, 2011. Women on boards - Factsheet 2 Gender equality in the Member States Women on boards – Factsheet 4 Gender equality in the European Commission. Data retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/gender-decision-making/database/index_en.htm.
  • Fagan, C., González-Menéndez, M.C., Gómez-Ansón, S., Women on Corporate Boards and in Top Management: European Trends and Policy. 2012, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
  • Fagan, C.M., Women in Corporate Boards in Europe. 2013, Workshop European Parliament.
  • Farrel, K.A., Hersch, P.L., Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender. J. Corp. Finance 11 (2005), 85–106.
  • Glick, P., Ambivalent sexism, power distance, and gender inequality across cultures. Guimond, S., (eds.) Social Comparison and Social Psychology: Understanding Cognition, Intergroup Relations and Culture, 2006, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 283–302.
  • Goergen, M., Renneboog, L., Inside the boardroom. J. Corp. Finance 28 (2014), 1–5.
  • González-Menéndez, M.C., Martínez-González, L., Spain on the Norwegian pathway: towards a gender-balanced presence of women on corporate boards. Fagan, C., González-Menéndez, M.C., Gomez-Ansón, S., (eds.) Women on Corporate Boards in Top Management, 2012, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 169–197.
  • Grant Thornton International Business Report, Women in senior management: setting the stage for growth. Retrieved from https://www.grantthornton.global/en/insights/articles/women-in-business-2013/, 2013.
  • Griffin, R.W., Pustay, M.W., International Business. 6th ed., 2010, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  • Grosvold, J., Brammer, S., Rayton, B., Board diversity in the United Kingdom and Norway: an exploratory analysis. Bus. Ethics 16:4 (2007), 344–357.
  • Grosvold, J., Brammer, S., National institutional systems as antecedents of female board representation: an empirical study. Corp. Gov. 19:2 (2011), 116–135.
  • Grosvold, J., Rayton, B., Brammer, S., Women on corporate boards: a comparative institutional analysis. Bus. Soc. 55:8 (2016), 1157–1196.
  • Gupta, V., Hanges, P.J., Dorfman, P., Cultural clusters: methodology and findings. J. World Bus. 37:1 (2002), 11–15.
  • Gupta, N., Smith, N., Verner, M., The impact of Nordic countries’ family friendly policies on employment, wages and children. Rev. Econ. Househ. 6:1 (2008), 65–89.
  • Hair, J.F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R.E., Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed., 2010, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall.
  • Haslam, S.A., Ryan, M.K., Kulich, C., Trojanowski, G., Atkins, C., Investing with prejudice: the relationship between women's presence on company boards and objective and subjective measures of company performance. Br. J. Manage. 21 (2010), 484–497.
  • Heilman, M.E., Sex bias in work settings: the lack of fit model. Res. Organ. Behav.(5), 1983, 269–298.
  • Heilman, M.E., Description and prescription: how gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. J. Soc. Issues 57:4 (2001), 657–674.
  • Hofstede, G., Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. 1980, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
  • Hofstede, G., Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pac. J. Manage. 1:2 (1984), 81–99.
  • Hofstede, G., McCrae, R.R., Personality and culture revisited: linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cult. Res. 38:1 (2004), 5–88.
  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. 2005, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., Minkov, M., Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Revised and Expanded. 3rd ed., 2010, McGraw Hill, New York.
  • Kleinbaum, D.B., Kupper, L.L., Muller, K.E., Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. 1998, Duxbury Press, Belmont.
  • Konrad, A., Kramer, V., Erkut, S., Critical mass: the impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organ. Dyn. 37:2 (2008), 145–164.
  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R., The quality of government. J. Law Econ. Organ. 15:1 (1999), 222–279.
  • Labelle, R., Gargouri, R.M., Francoeur, C., Ethics, diversity management, and financial reporting quality. J. Bus. Ethics 93:2 (2010), 335–353.
  • Lubatkin, M.H., Lane, P.J., Collin, S.O., Very, P., An embeddedness framing of governance and opportunism: towards a cross-nationally accommodating theory of agency. J. Organ. Behav. 28 (2007), 43–58.
  • Matsa, D., Miller, A.R., A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 5 (2013), 136–169.
  • Meyer, J.W., World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36:36 (2010), 1–20.
  • Milikic, B., The influence of culture on human resources management processes and practices: the propositions for Serbia. Econ. Annu. 181:1 (2009), 93–118.
  • North, D.C., Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Parboteeah, K.P., Hoegl, M., Cullen, J.B., Managers’ gender role attitudes: a country institutional profile approach. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 39:5 (2008), 795–813.
  • Peng, M.W., Wang, D.Y., Jiang, Y., An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 39:5 (2008), 920–936.
  • Peng, M.W., Sun, S.L., Pinkham, B., Chen, H., The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Acad. Manage. Perspect. 23:3 (2009), 63–81.
  • Piscopo, J., Muntean, S.C., Corporate quotas and symbolic politics in advanced democracies. J. Women Polit. Policy 39:3 (2018), 285–309.
  • Powell, G.N., Handbook of Gender and Work Publications. 1999, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
  • Reiche, S.R., Yih-teen, L., Quintanilla, J., Cultural perspectives on comparative HRM. Stahl, G.K., Björkman, I., Morris, S., (eds.) Handbook of Research on Comparative Human Resource Management, 2012, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 51–68.
  • Scott, W.R., Institutions and Organizations. 2nd edition, 2001, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Selby, C.C., From male locker room to co-ed boardroom: a twenty-five year perspective. Burke, R., Mattis, M.C., (eds.) Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: International Challenges and Opportunities, 2000, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 239–251.
  • Shahwan, U., Relationship between “power-distance” and employee performance in multi-national organizations. Skyline Bus. J. 12:1 (2016), 48–54.
  • Shinnar, R.S., Giacomin, O., Janssen, F., Entrepreneurial perceptions and intentions: the role of gender and culture. Entrep. Theory Pract. 36:3 (2012), 465–493.
  • Siciliano, J.L., The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance. J. Bus. Ethics 15 (1996), 1313–1320.
  • Smith, M., Srinivasan, P., Zhuk, K., Women in top management in France: a time of change?. Fagan, C., González-Menéndez, M., Gómez-Ansón, S., (eds.) Women on Corporate Boards and in Top Management, 2012, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 150–168.
  • Steinmetz, S., The Contextual Challenges of Occupational Sex Segregation: Deciphering Cross-National Differences in Europe. 2012, Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden, Germany.
  • Suk, J.C., Gender parity and state legitimacy: from public office to corporate boards. Icon-Int. J. Const. Law 10:2 (2012), 449–464.
  • Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X., Tarhini, T., Examining the moderating effect of individual-level cultural values on users’ acceptance of E-learning in developing countries: a structural equation modelling of an extended technology acceptance model. Interact. Learn. Environ. 25:3 (2016), 306–328.
  • Teigen, M., Gender quotas for corporate boards in Norway: innovative gender equality policy. Fagan, C., González-Menéndez, M., Gómez-Ansón, S., (eds.) Women on Corporate Boards and in Top Management: European Trends and Policy, 2012, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 70–90.
  • Terjesen, S., Singh, V., Female presence on corporate boards: a multi-country study of environmental context. J. Bus. Ethics 83:1 (2008), 55–63.
  • Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., Singh, V., Women directors on corporate boards: a review and research agenda. Corp. Gov. 17:3 (2009), 320–337.
  • Terjesen, S., Aguilera, R.V., Lorenz, R., Legislating a woman's seat on the board: institutional factors driving gender quotas for boards of directors. J. Bus. Ethics 128:2 (2015), 233–251.
  • Thébaud, S., Masculinity, margaining, and breadwinning. Understanding men's housework in the cultural context of paid work. Gend. Soc. 24:3 (2010), 330–354.
  • Tyson Report, The Tyson report on the recruitment and development of non-executive directors. Retrieved from http://facultyresearch.london.edu/docs/TysonReport.pdf, 2003.
  • Van der Walt, N., Ingley, C., Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directors. Corp. Gov. 11:3 (2003), 218–234.
  • Verge, T., Lombardo, E., The differential approach to gender quotas in Spain: Regulated politics and self-regulated corporate boards. EUI Department of Law Research Paper No. 2015/24, 2015.
  • Verwiebe, R., Social institutions. Michalon, A.C., (eds.) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 2014, Springer, The Netherlands, 6101–6104.
  • Wang, M., Kelan, E., The gender quota and female leadership: effects of the Norwegian gender quota on board chairs and CEOs. J. Bus. Ethics 117:3 (2013), 449–466.