Tipología de los fonemas laringales (las laringales y los vocales adyacentes)

  1. Rubio Orecilla, Francisco Javier
Revista:
Minerva: Revista de filología clásica

ISSN: 0213-9634

Año de publicación: 1993

Número: 7

Páginas: 11-26

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Minerva: Revista de filología clásica

Resumen

This paper eonsists on a typologieal analysis of laryngeal phonems: glottals, pharyngeals and, partly, uvulars, in order to identify the real nature of the three PIE laryngeals. As a first attempt, we propose /?/, /h/ and /hw/, a hypothesis based merely on the statistical probability of these phonems in a corpus of ea. 300 languages. Inasmuch as the more noticeable feature of the PIE laryngeals is the influence on adjacent vowels, we analyze the relation between vowels and laryngeals in arabic, hebrew, arbore and other languages.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • O. Szemerényi, «La théorie des laryngales de Saussure á Kurylowicz», BSL 68 (1975), pp. 1-25.
  • M. Ruhlen, A Guide to the Languages of the World,1975-1976, Language Universals Project, Stanford University.
  • M. Ruhlen, «The Geographical and Genetic Distribution of Linguistic Features», Linguyistic Studies offered to J. Greenberg (Ed. A. Juilland) Saratoga (Anma Libri), vol. 1, pp. 137-160.
  • P. S. Hopper, «The typology of PIE segmental Inventory», JIES 5 (1977), pp.41-53.
  • Th. V. Gamkrelidze, «The Indo-European Glottalic Theory: A New Paradigm in IE Comparative Linguistics», JIES 15 (1987), pp. 47-59.
  • S. Suzuki, «The Glottalic theory and Dialectical Development of the PIE Stop System», KZ 98 (1985), pp. 285-294.
  • A. R. Bomhard, «Recent Trends in Reconstruction of the Proto-Indo-European Consonant System», KZ 101 (= Hist. Spra-chforsch.) 1988, pp. 2-25.
  • G. D. Djahukian, «A Variational Model of the Indoeuropean Consonant System», KZ 103 (= Hist. Sprachforsch.), pp.1990, pp. 1-16.
  • J.Tischler, «Hundert Jahre kentum-satem Theorie», IF 95 (1990), pp. 63-98.
  • F. O. Lindeman, Einführung in die Laryngaltheorie, Berlin (De Gruyter), 1970, p. 100.
  • A. S. Kaye, «Arabic», The World's Major Languages (Ed. B. Comrie), Londres-Sidney (Croom Helm), 1987, pp. 654-685.
  • L. H. Gray, Introduction to Semitic Comparative Linguistics, Amsterdam (Philo Press), 1971.
  • W. Gesenius -G. Bergestasser, Hebraische Grammatik, Darmstadt (Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), 1985 (reimpresión de la ed. de Leipzig, 1909).
  • G. Garbini, Le lingue semitiche. Studi di storia linguistica, Napoli, 1984, pp. 55-61.
  • K. Petrachek, «Die semitische Laryngal-Theorie in die Sprache von Ibla», AION 39 (1979), pp. 385-395.
  • J. Liebermann, «The Regularity of Sound-Change: A Semitistic perspective», Linguistic Change and methodology (Ed. Ph. Baldi), Berlin-New York (Walter de Gruyter) 1990, pp. 697-721.
  • D. Haiward, The Arbore Language: A First Investigation, Including a Vocabulary, Hamburgo (Helmut Buske Verlag) 1984, pp. 51 y ss.
  • W. L. Chak, «Caddoan», The Laguages of Native America (Ed. L. Campbell-M. Mitun), Austin-Londres, 1979, p. 217.
  • M. J. Andrade, «Quileute», Handbook of American Indian Languajes (III Parte, ed. F. Boas), Columbia University Press, 1933-1938, pp. 173 y ss.
  • L. Cambell, Quichean Linguistic Prehistory, Berkeley-Los Angeles-Londres, 1977.
  • L. Cambell, «Middle American Languages», The Languages of Native America (Ed. L. Campbell-M. Mithun), Austin-Londres 1979, p. 935.
  • V.V.A.A., Handbuch der Orientalistik, V. Band: Altaistik. Leiden-Colonia, 1968.
  • D. L. Olmsted, A history of Palihnihan Pronology, Berkeley-Los Angeles (University of California Press), 1964.
  • C. R. Rensch, «Otomangean Isoglosses», Native Languages of the Americas (Ed.Th. A. Sebeok), Londres-Nueva York (Plenum Press), vol. II (1977), p. 170.
  • M. Mithun, «Iroquoian», The Languages of Native America (Ed. L. Campbell-M. Mithun), Austin-Londres 1979, p. 179.
  • G. Story, «Problems in fonemic representation of Beaver», Athapaskan Linguistics: Current Perspectives on a Language Family (Ed. E. D. Cook-K. D. Rice), Berlin-Nueva York (Mouton-De Gruyter) 1989, pp. 63-98.
  • J. A. Suárez, The Mesoamerican Indian Languages, Cambridge-Londres-Nueva York (Cambridge University Press), 1983, pp. 33 y ss.
  • A. L. Bomhard, «The IE-Semitic Hypotesis Re-examined», JIES 5 (1977), PP.55-99.
  • A. L. Bomhard, «A Survey of the Comparative Phonology of the so-called Nostratic Languages», Linguistic Change and Reconstruction Methodology (Ed. P. Baldi), Berlin-New York (Mouton-De Gruyter) 1990, 231-267.
  • O. Szemerényi y Saul Levin en General Linguistics 17 (1974), pp. 197-205 y 206-213.
  • R. S. P. Beekes, «The Nature ofthe Proto-Indo-European Laryngeals», en The New Sound of Indo-European (Ed. Th.Venemann), Berlin-New York (Mouton-De Gruyter) 1989, pp. 23-33.
  • J. E. Rasmussen, Studien zur Morphonemik der indogermanischen Grundsprache, Innsbruck, 1989.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet