Effects of training under variability of practice conditions on the accuracy of penalty throw in handball

  1. García Herrero, Juan Antonio 1
  2. Moreno Hernández, Francisco Javier 2
  3. Cabero Morán, María Teresa 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

  2. 2 Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche
    info

    Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche

    Elche, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01azzms13

Revista:
E-Balonmano.com: Revista de Ciencias del Deporte

ISSN: 1885-7019

Ano de publicación: 2011

Volume: 7

Número: 2

Páxinas: 67-77

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: E-Balonmano.com: Revista de Ciencias del Deporte

Resumo

          Abstract   The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of practice variability in the accuracy of the penalty throw in handball. Fourteen young players from national team (15 ± 0,401 year; 8 ± 1,41 year of experience) took part in the study. Participants preformed two protocols of practice in different condition (variability of practice and specificity of practice). Results showed higher values in increased shoot accuracy after practice in variability condition (23,83 cm. ±3,66) than after specificity of practice condition 29,82 cm. ±7,62), (p

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Antón, J. L. (2000) Análisis táctico individual del lanzamiento de siete metros (1ª parte) En Balonmano. Perfeccionamiento e investigación (p. 51-69). Barcelona. INDE.
  • Beckman, H. y Schölhorn, W. (2003). Differential learning in shot put. En W. Schöllhorn, C. Bohn, J.M. Jäger, H. Schaper y M. Alichmann (eds.), European workshop on movement science Mechanics and Physiology, Münster (alemania), 22-24 de mayo (libro de actas).
  • Barlow D.H. y Hersen, M. (1988). Diseños experimentales de caso único. Barcelona. Martínez Roca. Davids K, Button, C, y Bennett, S. (2008). Dynamics of Skill Acquisition: A Constraints-led Approach. Champaign, Illinois. Human Kinetics.
  • Davids K, Glazier P, Araujo D, y Bartlet, R. (2003) Movement systems as dynamical systems: the role of functional variability and its implications for sports medicine. Sports Medicine, 33, 245–60.
  • Davids, K., Bennett, S. y Newell, K. (2006). Movement System Variability. USA: Human Kinetics. Falkowski, M. M. y Enríquez, E. y (1982) Estudio monográfico de los jugadores de campo. Volumen I. Aspectos técnicos. Madrid. Esteban Sanz Martínez.
  • Hancock, G. R., Butler, M. S., y Fishman, M. G. (1995) On the problem of two-dimensional error scores: measures and analyses of accuracy, bias, and consistency. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 241-250.
  • Hernández, J. M.; Rodríguez, A. J.; Álvarez, P. A.; Jiménez, F. y Hernández, I. M. (2010). Estudio transversal de la eficacia del lanzamiento de 7 metros en balonmano femenino. http://www.efdeportes.com/ Revista Digital. Buenos Aires. Año 15 Nº 145
  • Latash, M.L. (1993). Control of Human Movement. Champaign. Illinois: Human Kinetics.
  • Lee, T.D., Magill, R.A., y Weeks, D.J. (1985). Influence of practice schedule on testing schema theory predictions in adults. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 283-299.
  • Moreno, F.J. y Ordoño, E. (2009). Aprendizaje motor y síndrome general de adaptación. Motricidad. European Journal of Human Movement, 22, 1-21.
  • Pereda, S. (1988). Psicología Experimental. Madrid: Pirámide.
  • Riley, M. A,y Turvey, M. T. (2002) Variability and determinism in motor behavior. Journal Motor Behavior, 34,,99-125
  • Ruiz, L. M. (1998). La variabilidad en el aprendizaje deportivo. Revista http://www.efdeportes.com/ Año 3. Nº 11. Buenos Aires
  • Schmidt, R.A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
  • Schmidt, R.A. (2003). Motor schema theory after 27 years: Reflection and implications for a new theory.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 366-375.
  • Shea, C.H. y Kohl, R. (1991). Specificity and variability of practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 61, 169-177.
  • Sherwood, D.E. y Lee, T.D. (2003) Schema theory: Critical review and implications for the role of cognition in a new theory of motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 376-382.
  • Tripp, B. L.; Boswell, L.; Gansneder, B. M; y Shultz, S.J. (2004). Functional fatigue decreases 3- dimensional multijoint position reproduction acuity in the overhead-throwing athlete. Journal of Athletic Training, 39(4), 316-320.
  • Trockel, M. y Schölhorn, W. (2003). Differential training in soccer. In W. SCHÖLLHORN, C. BOHN, J.M. JÄGER, H. SCHAPER, y M. ALICHMANN (eds.), European workshop on movement science Mechanics and Physiology, Müster (Alemania), 22-24 de mayo (libro de actas).
  • Van den Tillaar, R. y Ettema, G. (2003) Instructions emphasizing velocity, accuracy, or both in performance and kinematics of overarm throwing by experienced team handball players. Perceptual Motor Skills, 97, 731-42.
  • Van den Tillaar, R. y Ettema, G. (2006). A comparison between novices and experts of the velocityaccuracy trade-off in overarm throwing. Perceptual Motor Skills, 103, 503-14.
  • Van Rossum, JHA (1990). Schmidt’s schema theory: the empirical base of the variability of practice theory. Human Movement Science, 9, 387-435.
  • Wilson C, Simpson SE, van Emmerik RE, Hamill J. (2008). Coordination variability and skill development in expert triple jumpers. Sports Biomech., 7, 2–9.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet