The lexico-structural/semantic progression in discourse topic constructionevidence from comment articles

  1. Alonso Rodríguez, Pilar
Revista:
Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación

ISSN: 1576-4737

Año de publicación: 2010

Número: 44

Páginas: 3-26

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación

Resumen

In this article, Seuren's notion of mod-proposition is taken as point of departure to address the question of discourse topic. Seuren distinguishes between the classic notion of proposition (flat-propositions) and modulated propositions (mod-propositions), and assigns to the latter a topic-comment modulated structure which becomes essential to decide on the information structure of discourse, especially in terms of incrementation. Drawing from this propositional modulated status, different theoretical approaches to the notion of topic at sentence level are reviewed and special attention is paid to the syntactic functions identified by these theoreticians as predominantly topical. Then the empirical analysis of a small corpus of comment articles in English is used to classify the linguistic strategies employed in the construction of a global discourse topic; this procedure makes it possible to focus on those topics which gradually acquire global projection by re-use, in opposition to those pieces of information which are topical only at the local level. Based on this evidence, our research shows the linguistic mechanisms which allow for re-used topical information to gradually acquire subject status as discourse progresses and proposes thinking in terms of intermediate information structures as subsumers of local information and builders of global topics.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alonso, Pilar (2005) Semantics. A Discourse Perspective. Oviedo: Septem
  • Alonso, Pilar (2006a) Discourse strategies for global topic construction in complex written texts: Evidence from comment articles. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 19: 9-22.
  • Alonso, Pilar (2006b) On the notion of discourse topic. In Marta Carretero, et al, (eds.), A Pleasure of Life in Words: A Festschrift for Angela Downing, pp. 591-603. Madrid: Universidad Complutense.
  • Beaugrande, R. de (1997). New Foundations for a Science of Text and Discourse. Norwood: Ablex.
  • Brown, Gillian and Yule, George (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Clark, Herbert and Haviland, Susan (1977) Comprehension and the given-new contract. In Roy O. Freedle, (ed.), Discourse Production and Comprehension, pp. 1-40. Norwood: Ablex.
  • Downing, A. (2000). "Talking Topically." clac 3/2000. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Available online at http://www.ucm.es/info/ circulo/no3/downing.htm.
  • Downing, A. (2001). "Thematic Progression as a Functional Resource in Analysing Texts." clac 5/2001. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Available online at http://www.ucm.es/info/circulo/no5/downing.htm.
  • Downing, A. & P. Locke (1992). A University Course in English Grammar. New York: Prentice Hall.
  • Givón, Talmy (1983) Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In Givón, Talmy (ed.), Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study, pp. 5-41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Givón, T. (1984). Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Givón, Talmy (1990) Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Gregory, Michelle and Michaelis, Laura (2001) Topicalization and left-dislocation: A functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1665-1706.
  • Halliday, M.A.K. (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
  • Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, Ruqaiya (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
  • Hockett, C.F. (1958) A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.
  • Gómez-González, M.A. (2001). The Theme-Topic Inteface. Evidence from English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Gundel, Jeanette (1999) Topic, focus, and the grammar-pragmatic interface. In Jim Alexander, Na-Rae Han and Michelle Minnick Fox (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd. Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics. Vol. 6.1. Available at http://www.ling.upenn.edu/ papers/v6.1-contents.html.
  • Jaeger, Florian and Oshima, David (2002) Towards a dynamic model of topic marking. Stanford Semantics and Pragmatics Workshop: The Construction of Meaning. Stanford Humanities Center and the Mellon Foundation. Available at http://www-linguistics.stanford.edu/semgroup/archive/2002/autumn.html
  • Lambrecht, Knud (1994) Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Petöfi, J. S. and E. Sözer (Eds.) (1983). Micro and Macro Connexity of Texts. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
  • Prince, Ellen (1981) Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, pp. 223-255. New York: Academic Press.
  • Seuren, Pieter (2000) A discourse semantic account of topic and comment. In Nicolas Nicolov and Ruslan Mitkov (eds.), Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing II, pp. 179-190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Van Dijk, Teun A. (1977) Sentence topic and discourse topic. Papers in Slavic Philology, 1: 49-61.
  • van Dijk, Teun A. (1980) Macrostructures. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • van Dijk, Teun A. (1985) Semantic discourse analysis. In Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis Vol.2, pp. 103-136. London: Academic Press.
  • van Dijk, Teun A. and Kintch, Walter (1983) Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
  • Werth, P. (1984). Focus, Coherence and Emphasis. London: Croom Helm.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet