Yo prefiero al corruptoel perfil de los ciudadanos que eligen políticos deshonestos pero competentes

  1. Martínez Rosón, María del Mar 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Burgos
    info

    Universidad de Burgos

    Burgos, España

    ROR https://ror.org/049da5t36

Revista:
REIS: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas

ISSN: 0210-5233

Año de publicación: 2016

Número: 153

Páginas: 77-94

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5477/CIS/REIS.153.77 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: REIS: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas

Resumen

Los resultados electorales muestran que los electores no siempre castigan a los políticos corruptos en las urnas y son capaces de votar a un político corrupto si este es competente. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar las características que diferencian a los ciudadanos que están dispuestos a apoyar a los corruptos de los electores que no lo están a partir de datos de opinión pública en Costa Rica. Los resultados muestran que hay cuatro variables que diferencian ambos grupos: los conocimientos políticos, los ingresos, la edad y el género. Las mujeres y los ciudadanos con más conocimientos políticos eligen políticos deshonestos pero competentes en menor medida que los hombres y aquellos ciudadanos con menos conocimientos políticos. Por el contrario, los jóvenes y los ciudadanos con más ingresos están dispuestos a compensar la falta de honradez con más competencia en mayor medida que los adultos y aquellos con menores ingresos.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abramowitz, Alan I. (1991). «Incumbency, Campaign Spending, and the Decline of Competition in US House Elections». Journal of Politics, 53(1): 34-56.
  • Almeida, Alberto Carlos (2007). A cabeça do brasileiro. São Paulo: Record.
  • Bågenholm, Andreas (2013). «Throwing the Rascals Out? The Electoral Effects of Corruption Allegations and Corruption Scandals in Europe 1981-2011». Crime, Law and Social Change, 60(5): 595-609. Barómetro de las Américas, Proyecto de Opinión Pública de América Latina (LAPOP), www.LapopSurveys.org.
  • Bonifácio, Robert (2013). «A afeição dos cidadãos pelos políticos mal-afamados: identifi cando os perfi s associados à aceitação do “rouba, mas faz” no Brasil». Opinião Pública, 19(2): 320-345.
  • Booth, John A. and Seligson, Mitchell A. (2005). «Political Legitimacy and Participation in Costa Rica: Evidence of Arena Shopping». Political Research Quarterly, 58(4): 537-550.
  • Bratton, Michael (2009). «Are You Being Served?: Popular Satisfaction with Health and Education Services in Africa». In: Bland, G. and Arnson, C. J. (eds.). Democratic Defi cits: Addressing Challenges to Sustainability and Consolidation Around the World. Washington: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
  • Bruner, Jerome S. and Korchin, Sheldon J. (1946). «The Boss and the Vote: Case Study in City Politics». The Public Opinion Quarterly, 10(1): 1-23.
  • Caínzos, Miguel and Jiménez, Fernando (2000). «El impacto de los escándalos de corrupción sobre el voto en las elecciones generales de 1996». Historia y Política, 4: 93-132.
  • Campbell, Angus; Gurin, Gerald and Miller, Warren E. (1954). The Voter Decides. Evanston: Row Peterson.
  • Campbell, Angus; Converse, Philip E.; Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E. (1960). The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.
  • Canache, Damarys; Mondak, Jeffery J. and Cabrera, Ernesto (2000). «Voters and the Personal Vote: A Counterfactual Simulation». Political Research Quarterly, 53(3): 663-676.
  • Chang, Eric C. C. and Kerr, Nicholas N. (2009). «Do Voters Have Different Attitudes Toward Corruption? The Sources and Implications of Popular Perceptions and Tolerance of Political Corruption». Afrobarometer Working Papers, 116.
  • Choi, Eunjung and Woo, Jongseok (2010). «Political Corruption, Economic Performance, and Electoral Outcomes: A Cross-National Analysis». Contemporary Politics, 16(3): 249-262.
  • Deegan-Krause, Kevin; Klasnja, Marko and Tucker, Joshua (2011). «It’s the Bribe, Stupid! Pocketbook vs. Sociotropic Corruption». Paper presented at Conference Annual APSA, September 1-4, Seattle. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1899944.
  • Delgado Jiménez, Francisco (2013). «El empleo informal en Costa Rica: características de los ocupados y sus puestos de trabajo». Ciencias Económicas, 31(2): 35-51.
  • Dimock, Michael A. and Jacobson, Gary C. (1995). «The House Bank Scandal’s Impact on Voters in 1992». The Journal of Politics, 57(4): 1143-1159.
  • Dollar, David; Fisman, Raymond and Gatti, Roberta (2001). «Are Women Really the “Fairer” Sex? Corruption and Women in Government». Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 46(4): 423-429.
  • Finan, Frederico and Ferraz, Claudio (2005). «Reelection Incentives and Political Corruption: Evidence from Brazilian Audit Reports». Paper presented to Annual Meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
  • Fiorina, Morris P. (1981). Retrospective Voting in American Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Funk, Carolyn L. (1996). «The Impact of Scandal on Candidate Evaluations: An Experimental Test of the Role of Candidate Traits». Political Behavior, 18(1): 1-24.
  • Funk, Carolyn L. (1997). «Implications of Political Expertise in Candidate Trait Evaluations». Political Research Quarterly, 50(3): 675-697.
  • Funk, Carolyn L. (1999). «Bringing the Candidate into Models of Candidate Evaluation». Journal of Politics, 61(3): 700-720.
  • Goetz, Anne Marie (2007). «Political Cleaners: Women as the New Anti-Corruption Force?». Development and Change, 38(1): 87-105.
  • Jacobson, Gary C. and Dimock, Michael A. (1994). «The Effects of Bank Overdrafts on the 1992 House Elections». American Journal of Political Science, 38(3): 601-624.
  • Jiménez, Fernando and Caínzos, Miguel (2004). «La repercusión electoral de los escándalos políticos. Alcance and condiciones». Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 10: 141-170.
  • Johnston, Michael (1991). «Right & Wrong in British Politics: “Fits of Morality” in Comparative Perspective». Polity, 24(1): 1-25.
  • Kinder, Donald R.; Petres, Mark D.; Abelson, Robert P. and Fiske, Susan T. (1980). «Presidential Prototypes». Political Behavior, 2(4): 315-337.
  • Kinder, Donald R. (1983). Presidential Traits. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Kulisheck, Michael R. and Mondak, Jeffery J. (1996). «Candidate Quality and the Congressional Vote: A Causal Connection?». Electoral Studies, 15(2): 237-253.
  • Kumlin, Staffan and Esaiasson, Peter (2012). «Scandal Fatigue? Scandal Elections and Satisfaction with Democracy in Western Europe 1977-2007». British Journal of Political Research, 42(2): 263-282.
  • Lehoucq, Fabrice (2005). «Costa Rica: Paradise in Doubt». Journal of Democracy, 16(3): 140-154.
  • Maier, Jürgen (2011). «The Impact of Political Scandals on Political Support: An Experimental Test of Two Theories». International Political Science Review, 32(3): 283-302.
  • Manzetti, Luigi and Wilson, Carole J. (2007). «Why Do Corrupt Governments Maintain Public Support?». Comparative Political Studies, 40(8): 949-970.
  • Martínez Rosón, María del Mar (2014). «The Good, the Bad and the Winner. Buenos políticos and éxito electoral en América Latina». Revista de Ciencia Política, 34(2): 351-372.
  • McCurley, Carl and Mondak, Jeffery J. (1995). «Inspected by #1184063113: The Infl uence of Incumbents Competence and Integrity in U.S. House Elections». American Journal of Political Science, 39(4): 864-885.
  • Mondak, Jeffery J. (1995). «Competence, Integrity, and the Electoral Success of Congressional Incumbents». The Journal of Politics, 57(4): 1043-1069.
  • Morán, Mª Luz and Benedicto, Jorge (1995). La cultura política de los españoles. Un ensayo de reinterpretación. Madrid: CIS.
  • Muñoz, Jordi; Anduiza, Eva and Gallego, Aina (2013). «Why Voters Forgive Corrupt Politicians? Implicit Exchange, Noise and Cynicism». Paper presented to Workshop «Citizen Responses to Political Corruption: Elections and Accountability», July 19, Barcelona.
  • Muñoz, Jordi and Esaiasson, Peter (2013). «Roba pero hace? –An Experimental Test of the Competencecorruption Tradeoff Hypothesis in Spain and Sweden». Paper presented to Workshop «Citizen Responses to Political Corruption: Elections and Accountability», July 19, Barcelona.
  • Page, Benjamin I. (1978). Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Pereira, Carlos; Rennó, Lucio and Samuels, David (2008). «Corruption, Campaign Finance, and Electoral Accountability». Paper presented to Workshop Accountability Institutions and Political Corruption in Brazil, Oxford University, May 23.
  • Peters, John G. and Welch, Susan (1978). «Politics, Corruption, and Political Culture. A View From the State Legislature». American Politics Research, 6(3): 345-356.
  • Poguntke, Thomas and Webb, Paul (2005). «The Presidentialization of Politics in Democratic Societies: A Framework of Analysis». In: The Presidentialization of Politics. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Popova, Olga (2010). «Corruption, Voting and Employment Status: Evidence from Russian Parliamentary Elections». CERGE-EI Working Papers, 428.
  • Popkin, Samuel L. (1991). The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Prewitt, Kenneth (1970). The Recruitment of Political Leaders. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
  • Prysby, Charles (2008). «Perceptions of Candidate Character Traits and the Presidential Vote in 2004». Political Science and Politics, 41(1): 115- 122.
  • Redlawsk, David P. and McCann, James A. (2002). «How Voters See Political Corruption: Defi nitions and Beliefs, Causes and Consequences». Paper presented to Annual Meeting de SPSA, New Orleans, March 28-30.
  • Riera, Pedro; Barberá, Pablo; Gómez, Raúl; Mayoral, Juan Antonio and Montero, José Ramón (2013). «The Electoral Consequences of Corruption Scandals in Spain». Crime, Law and Social Change, 60(5): 515-534.
  • Rundquist, Barry S.; Strom, Gerald S. and Peters, John G. (1977). «Corrupt Politicians and Their Electoral Support: Some Experimental Observations». The American Political Science Review, 71(3): 954-963.
  • Sánchez, Fernando (2007). Partidos políticos, elecciones y lealtades partidarias en Costa Rica: erosión y cambio. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
  • Seligson, Mitchell A. (2002). «Trouble in Paradise? The Erosion of System Support in Costa Rica, 1978-1999». Latin American Research Review, 37(1): 160-185.
  • Sousa, Luís de and Moriconi, Marcelo (2013). «Why Voters Do Not Throw the Rascals Out? A Conceptual Framework for Analysing Electoral Punishment of Corruption». Crime, Law and Social Change, 60(5): 471-502.
  • Stoker, Laura (1993). «Judging Presidential Character: The Demise of Gary Hart». Political Behavior, 15(2): 193-223.
  • Stone, Walter J.; Maisel, Sandy and Maestas, Cherie D. (2004). «Quality Counts: Extending the Strategic Politician Model of Incumbent Deterrence». American Journal of Political Science, 48(3): 479-495.
  • Sullivan, John L.; Aldrich, John H.; Borgida, Eugene and Rahn, Wendy (1990). «Candidate Appraisal and Human Nature: Man and Superman in the 1984 Election». Political Psychology, 11(3): 459-484.
  • Sung, Hung-En (2003). «Fairer Sex or Fairer System? Gender and Corruption Revisited». Social Forces, 82(2): 705-725.
  • Swamy, Anand; Knack, Stephen; Lee, Young and Azfar, Omar (2001). «Gender and Corruption». Journal of Development Economics, 64(1): 25-55.
  • Torgler, Benno and Valev, Neven T. (2006). «Corruption and Age». Journal of Bioeconomics, 8(2): 133-145.
  • Villoria, Manuel and Jiménez, Fernando (2012). «La corrupción en España (2004-2010): datos, percepción y efectos». Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 138: 109-134.
  • Welch, Susan and Hibbing, John (1997). «The Effect of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections, 1982-90». Journal of Politics, 59(1): 226-239.
  • Winters, Matthew S. and Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca (2013). «Lacking Information or Condoning Corruption. When Do Voters Support Corrupt Politicians?». Comparative Politics, 45: 418-436.