Metodología en Otorrinolaringología. Lectura crítica de la literaturaimportancia y aplicabilidad

  1. Luis Miguel PALOMAR RODRÍGUEZ
Journal:
Revista ORL

ISSN: 2444-7986,  2444-7986

Year of publication: 2018

Volume: 9

Volume: 4

Pages: 283-286

Type: Article

DOI: 10.14201/ORL.16734 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Revista ORL

Abstract

The critical appraisal of the literature is a desirable skill in every doctor, who should be acquired in the context of the formation of all the MIR, but also in all either they happened for this process and did not acquire it. Objective: Develop the concept of critical reading. Conclusions: Although beforehand it can generate rejection in many for considering it to be unattainable, really it is relatively simple, it does not need a deep formation in methodology, epidemiology and statistics, and many help hardware exists nowadays to apply it with facility. It is demonstrated that it brings a critical vision to the doctor, what is considered to be fundamental, serves to stay updated, it is an autoovercoming stimulus and it generates satisfaction in the professiona

Bibliographic References

  • Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al; GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004 Jun 19; 328:1490-2004.
  • https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490
  • Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, IrwigLM, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD Initiative. BMJ. 2003 Jan 4;326(7379):41-4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7379.41
  • Cabello López, JC. Lectura crítica de la evidencia clínica. Septiembre 10, 2015. Elsevier
  • How to Read a Paper: The Basics of Evidence-Based Medicine, 5th Edition Trisha Greenhalgh. March 2014, BMJ Books
  • How to read clinical journals: I. why to read them and how to start reading them critically. an Med Assoc J. 1981 Mar 1;124(5):555-8. PubMed PMID: 7471000; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1705173.
  • Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, ClarkeM, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100. Epub 2009 Jul 21. PubMed PMID: 19621070; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
  • Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement:revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001; 357:1191-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04337-3
  • Straus, S., Richardson, W.S., Glasziou, P. & Haynes, R.B. (2005). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM (3rd ed.). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.4th Ed.: 2011
  • Suleng K. Alerta, pregunta incómoda: ¿está fracasando la medicina? El país [Internet] 4 SEP 2016 - 11:26 CEST
  • User´s Guides to the Medical Literature. A manual for evidence-based clinical practice, 3rd edition. McGraw Hill Education. JAMA evidence.
  • Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007 Oct20;370(9596):1453-PubMed PMID: 18064739.
Data source: Dialnet