Listas guía de comprobación en publicaciones biomédicas

  1. Pardal Refoyo, José Luis
  2. Ochoa Sangrador, Carlos
Revista:
Revista ORL

ISSN: 2444-7986,  2444-7986

Any de publicació: 2013

Volum: 4

Pàgines: 201-210

Tipus: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Altres publicacions en: Revista ORL

Resum

Introduction and objectives: the authors, reviewers, editors and readers must have specific tools that help them in the process of drafting, review, or reading the articles. Objective: to offer a summary of the major checklists for different types of biomedical research articles. Material and method: review literature and resources of the EQUATOR Network and adaptations in Spanish published by Medicina Clínica and Evidencias en Pediatría journals. Results: are the checklists elaborated by various working groups. (CONSORT and TREND), experimental studies for observational studies (STROBE), accuracy (STARD) diagnostic studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and for studies to improve the quality (SQUIRE). Conclusions: the use of checklists help to improve the quality of articles and help to authors, reviewers, to the editor and readers in the development and understanding of the content.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Altman DG, Bossuyt PM; STARD group; REMARK group. [Diagnostic (STARD) and prognostic (REMARK) studies]. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;125 Suppl 1:49-55.
  • Altman DG, Moher D. [Developing guidelines for reporting healthcare research: scientific rationale and procedures]. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;125 Suppl 1:8-13.
  • Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman DG; CONSORT CLUSTER group. [The CONSORT statement for cluster randomised trials]. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;125 Suppl 1:28-31.
  • Cobo E, Domínguez R, Pulido M. [Common and specific methodological features of checklists]. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;125 Suppl 1:14-20.
  • Cobos-Carbó A; CONSORT group. [Randomized clinical trials (CONSORT)]. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;125 Suppl 1:21-7.
  • Fernández E; STROBE group. [Observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE)]. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;125 Suppl 1:43-8.
  • González de Dios J, Buñuel Álvarez JC, Aparicio Rodrigo M. Listas guía de comprobación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis: declaración PRISMA. Evid Pediatr. 2011;7:97.
  • González de Dios J, Buñuel Álvarez JC, González Rodríguez MP. Listas guía de comprobación de intervenciones no aleatorizadas: declaración TREND. Evid Pediatr. 2013;9:14.
  • González de Dios J, Buñuel Álvarez JC, González Rodríguez P. Listas guía de comprobación de artículos científicos y la red EQUATOR. Evid Pediatr. 2011;7:47.
  • González de Dios J, Buñuel Álvarez JC, González Rodríguez P. Listas guía de comprobación de estudios observacionales: declaración STROBE. Evid Pediatr. 2012;8:65.
  • González de Dios J, Buñuel Álvarez JC, González Rodríguez P. Listas guía de comprobación de ensayos clínicos: declaración CONSORT. Evid Pediatr. 2011;7:72
  • González Rodríguez MP, Velarde Mayol C. Listas guía de comprobación de estudios sobre pruebas diagnósticas incluidos en las revisiones sistemáticas: declaración QUADAS. Evid Pediatr. 2012;8:20.
  • González Rodríguez MP. Velarde Mayol C. Lista de comprobación de estudios sobre precisión de pruebas diagnósticas: declaración STARD. Evid Pediatr. 2012;8:43
  • Lang TA, Altman DG. Basic Statistical Reporting for Articles Published in Biomedical Journals: The “Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature” or The SAMPL Guidelines” in: Smart P, Maisonneuve H, Polderman A (eds). Science Editors' Handbook, European Association of Science Editors, 2013.
  • Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, Altman DG (2010) Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines. PLoS Med 7(2): e1000217. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217
  • Pardal-Refoyo JL, Ochoa-Sangrador C. De la investigación a la publicación. El proceso editorial. Rev Soc Otorrinolaringol Castilla Leon Cantab La Rioja. 2013;4: 52-75.
  • Ribera JM, Cardellach F, Selva A; Editorial committee of Medicina Clínica. [The processes of manuscript evaluation and publication in Medicina Clínica. The editorial committee of Medicina Clínica]. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;125 Suppl 1:3-7.
  • Rovira-Forns J, Antoñanzas-Villar F. [Economic evaluation studies in health]. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;125 Suppl 1:61-71.
  • Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:698–702.
  • Simera I, Moher D, Hoey J, Schulz KF, Altman DG. A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research. Eur J Clin Invest 2010;40:35-53.
  • Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:181.
  • Torres F, Calvo G, Pontes C. [Methodological recommendations of the Regulatory Agencies]. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;125 Suppl 1:72-6.
  • Urrutia G, Tort S, Bonfill X; QUOROM group. [Meta-analyses (QUOROM)]. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;125 Suppl 1:32-7.
  • Valderas JM, Ferrer M, Alonso J. [Health-related quality of life instruments and other patient-reported outcomes]. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;125 Suppl 1:56-60.
  • Vallvé C, Artés M, Cobo E; TREND group. [Non-randomized evaluation studies (TREND)]. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;125 Suppl 1:38-42.
  • Vilardell M, Rey-Joly C. [Checklists for authors, revisers and editors of medical journals]. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;125 Suppl 1:1-2.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet