Propaganda Does Not Have to be Good or Evil

  1. Iago Ramos 1
  1. 1 University of Salamanca, Spain
Journal:
Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin

ISSN: 2254-0601

Year of publication: 2019

Volume: 8

Issue: 11

Pages: 99-114

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.3425228 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin

Abstract

This paper aims to demonstrate that, to discuss propaganda better, we ought to consider how its presence alters the dynamics of the milieu it influences. I examine Jason Stanley’s analysis of propaganda’s ability to undermine public deliberation and Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s defense of the use of propaganda for the establishment of egalitarian political communities, to conclude that propaganda does not have a wicked nature. To strengthen the claim, I introduce an analogy between propaganda and parasitism to illustrate that propaganda establishes a non-mutual relationship with the public mind

Bibliographic References

  • Achen, Christopher, and Bartels, Larry (2016). Democracy for Realists. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Bernardi, Bruno (2007). Le principe d’obligation. Paris: Vrin-EHESS.
  • Bernays, Edward (2005). Propaganda. New York: Ig Publishing.
  • Doob, Leonard. (1950). “Goebbels’ Principles of Propaganda.” Public Opinion Quarterly 14: 419–442. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/266211.
  • Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, etc. Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d’Alembert. University of Chicago: ARTFL Encyclopédie Project (Autumn 2017 Edition), Robert Morrissey and Glenn Roe (eds.), http://encyclopedie.uchicago.edu/
  • Gómez, Andrés, and Nichols, Elizabeth (2013). “Neglected wild life: Parasitic biodiversity as a conservation target”. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 2: 222-227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2013.07.002.
  • King, Martin Luther (2007). “Propagandizing Christianity. Sermon at Dexter Avenue Baptist Church”. In The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr. Volume VI: Advocate of the Social Gospel, September 1948 – March 1963. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Miller, Clyde (1939). “If You Would Detect Propaganda”. The Rotary 55(6): 14–15.
  • Neuhouser, Frederick (2014). Rousseau’s critique of inequality: reconstructing the second discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rousseau, Jean Jacques (2003). Œuvres Complètes Tome III. Paris: Bibliothèque de la Pléiade.
  • Rousseau, Jean Jacques (1861). “Lettres sur la Vertu et le Bonheur.” In Œuvres et Correspondance Inédites, 133–165. Paris: Michel Lèvy Frères.
  • Ségur, Louis-Philippe (1827). Mémoirs and Recollections of Count Ségur: Ambassador from France to the Courts of Russia and Prussia. Vol. 3. London: Henry Colburn.
  • Sheehan, Kim. (2013). Controversies in Contemporary Advertising. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
  • Stanley, Jason (2015). How Propaganda Works. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Swanson, Eric (2017). “Critical Notice of Jason Stanley’s How Propaganda Works”. Mind 126(503): 937-947. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzw045.
  • Tucker, Anne (2011). “Flawed Assumptions: A Corporate Law Analysis of Free Speech and Corporate Personhood in Citizens United”. Case Western Reserve Law Review 61: 495-548.
  • Tye, Larry (2002). The father of spin: Edward L. Bernays and the birth of public relations. New York: Macmillan.
  • Zotos, Yorgos, and, Tsichla, Eirini (2014). “Female Stereotypes in Print Advertising: A Retrospective Analysis”. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 148: 446–454. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.064