Unas fechas antiguas no hacen una nueva arqueologíala necesidad de integrar métodos arqueométricos y arqueológicos en los estudios de arte rupestre

  1. Randall White 1
  2. Gerhard Bosinski
  3. Raphaëlle Bourrillon
  4. Jean Clottes
  5. Margaret W. Conkey 2
  6. Soledad Corchón Rodríguez 3
  7. Miguel Cortés Sánchez 4
  8. Marco de la Rasilla Vives 5
  9. Brigitte Delluc 6
  10. Gilles Delluc 6
  11. Valérie Feruglio 7
  12. Harald Floss 8
  13. Pascal Foucher 9
  14. Carole Fritz 10
  15. Oscar Fuentes 11
  16. Diego Gárate Maidagán 12
  17. Jesús González Gómez
  18. Manuel R. González Morales 12
  19. María González-Pumariega Solís 13
  20. Marc Groenen 14
  21. Jacques Jaubert 15
  22. Elena Man-Estier 16
  23. María Aránzazu Martínez Aguirre 4
  24. Patrick Paillet 17
  25. Romain Pigeaud 16
  26. Stéphane Petrognani 17
  27. Geneviève Pinçon 18
  28. Frédéric Plassard 15
  29. Sergio Ripoll López 19
  30. Olivia Rivero Vilá 3
  31. Eric Robert 17
  32. Juan F. Ruiz López 20
  33. Cristina San Juan Foucher 9
  34. José Luis Sanchidrián Torti 21
  35. Georges Sauvet 10
  36. María Dolores Simón Vallejo 22
  37. Gilles Tosello 9
  38. Denis Vialou 17
  39. Agueda Vilhena Vialou 17
  40. Mark D. Willis 23
  41. Show all authors +
  1. 1 New York University (United States of América)
  2. 2 University of California (United States of América)
  3. 3 Universidad de Salamanca (España)
  4. 4 Universidad de Sevilla (España)
  5. 5 Universidad de Oviedo (España)
  6. 6 Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle. Paris (France)
  7. 7 Université de Bordeau (France)
  8. 8 Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen (Germany)
  9. 9 Université de Toulouse Jean Jaurés (France)
  10. 10 Maison des sciences de l’Homme de Toulouse (France)
  11. 11 Universidad de París X Nanterre (France)
  12. 12 Universidad de Cantabria (España)
  13. 13 Consejería de Educación y Cultura del Principado de Asturias (España)
  14. 14 Université libre de Bruxelles (Belgique)
  15. 15 Université de Bordeaux (France)
  16. 16 Université de Rennes 1 (France)
  17. 17 Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (France)
  18. 18 Centre national de Préhistoire.Ministère de la culture (France)
  19. 19 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (España)
  20. 20 Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (España)
  21. 21 Universidad de Córdoba
    info

    Universidad de Córdoba

    Córdoba, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05yc77b46

  22. 22 Universidad de Zaragoza (España)
  23. 23 Flinders University (Australia)
Show affiliations +
Journal:
Nailos: Estudios Interdisciplinares de Arqueología

ISSN: 2340-9126,  2341-1074

Year of publication: 2019

Issue: 6

Pages: 17-28

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Nailos: Estudios Interdisciplinares de Arqueología

Abstract

An international group of archaeologists specializing in cave art explain the diffi-culties they faced to publish their response to another paper, previously published in Science (Hoffmann et al. 2018), reporting a Neanderthal origin of some Spanish cave pain-tings according to Uranium-thorium method. In their reply, they underlined the diffe-rent sources of error that lead to overestimate the dates and summarized the contra-dictions with archeological arguments. Some American reviewers put more trust in ar-cheometry than in European arqueology, which is unfamiliar to them. Thus, the paper passed through the hands of many reviewers and it took more than one year to finally publish it in Journal of Human Evolution. This whole process illustrates the lack of trans-parency in peer review procedures -although apparently objective and neutral- when renowned authors are concerned.

Data source: Dialnet