Why publish in English versus Spanish?Towards a framework for the study of researchers’ motivations

  1. Irene López-Navarro 1
  2. Ana I. Moreno 2
  3. Sally Burgess 3
  4. Itesh Sachdev 4
  5. Jesús Rey-Rocha 1
  1. 1 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), España
  2. 2 Universidad de León, España
  3. 3 Universidad de La Laguna, España
  4. 4 University of London, United Kingdom
Montrer des affiliations +
Revue:
Revista española de documentación científica

ISSN: 0210-0614,  1988-4621

Année de publication: 2015

Volumen: 38

Número: 1

Type: Article

DOI: 10.3989/REDC.2015.1.1148 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista española de documentación científica

Résumé

This paper proposes a framework for the comparative study of researchers’ motivations for publishing either in English as an additional language or their first language. This framework seeks to present a view of motivation as dynamic, multidimensional, and multilevel. Empirical support is provided through the results of an on-line large-scale survey carried out among Spanish scholars. Our aim was to investigate which factors motivate them to publish their results in academic journals in either English or Spanish, as well as the extent to which these motivations are shaped by individual characteristics of researchers, particularly gender, seniority and publication experience. Results show an instrumental use of publication in English and fragmented social and ideological motivations for the use of Spanish.

Références bibliographiques

  • Amabile, T.M.; Hill, K.G.; Hennessey, B.A.; Tighe, E.M. (1994). The work preference inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 66 (5), 950–967. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.950
  • Barnes, B.; Dolby, R. G. A. (1970). The scientific ethos: a deviant viewpoint. Archive of European Sociology, vol. 11, 3-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600001934
  • Cea D'Ancona, C. (2001). Metodología Cuantitativa: Estrategias y Técnicas de Investigación Social. Madrid; Síntesis.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L.; Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education, (6th ed.) London; Rouledge.
  • Cokley, K. O. (2000). Examining the validity of the academic motivation scale by comparing scale construction to self-determination theory. Psychological Reports, vol. 86, 560–564. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2000.86.2.560 PMid:10840913
  • Cotgrove, S. (1970). The sociology of science and technology. The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 21 (1), 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/588267
  • Curry, M.; Lillis, T. (2004). Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: negotiating interests, demands and rewards. TESOL Quarterly, vol. 38, 663–688. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3588284
  • Dasgupta, P.; David, P. (1994). Towards a new economics of science. Research Policy, vol. 23, 487-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1
  • De Vaus, D. (2002). Surveys in Social Research (5th ed.) London; Rouledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446263495
  • Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 18, 105–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0030644
  • Deci, E. L.; Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York; Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 PMid:3841237
  • Deci, E. L.; Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, vol. 11 (4), 227–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  • Deci, E. L.; Ryan, R. M. (2002). Self-determination research: Reflections and future directions. In: Deci, E. L.; Ryan, R. M. (editors) Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press. New York, USA.
  • Deci, E. L.; Vallerand, R. J.; Pelletrier, L. G.; Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: the self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, vol. 26, 325-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
  • Dörnyei, Z. (1990). Conceptualizing motivation in foreign language learning. Language Learning, vol. 40, 45-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00954.x
  • Eiduson, B. T. (1962). Scientists: their psychological world. New York; Basic Books.
  • Fairchild, A. J.; Horst, S. J.; Finney, S. J.; Barron, K. E. (2005). Evaluating existing and new validity evidence for the Academic Motivation Scale. Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 30, 331-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.11.001
  • Ferguson, G. (2006). Language planning and education. Edinburgh; Edinburgh University Press.
  • Fernández-Esquinas, M.; Torres-Albero, C. (2009). La ciencia como institución social: clásicos y modernos institucionalismos en la sociología de la ciencia. Arbor, vol. 738, 663-687. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2009.738n1045
  • Flowerdew, J.; Li, Y. (2009). English or Chinese? The trade-off between local and international publication among Chinese academics in the humanities and social sciences. Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 18, 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.09.005
  • Gagné, M.; Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 26 (4), 331–362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.322
  • Gans, J. S.; Stern, S. (2010). Is there a market for ideas?. Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 19 (3), 805-837. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq023
  • Gómez, I.; Sancho, R.; Bordons, M.; Fernández, M. T. (2006). La I+D en Espa-a a través de sus publicaciones y patentes. In: Sebastián, J.; Mu-oz, E. (editors) Radiografía de la Investigación Pública en Espa-a. Biblioteca Nueva. Madrid, Spain.
  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, vol. 78 (6), 1360-1380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/225469
  • Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 93 (1), 48–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48 PMid:18211134
  • Haarmann, H.; Holman, H. (2001). The impact of English as a language of science in Finland and its role for the transition to network society. In: Ulrich, A. (editor) The dominance of English as a language of science: effects on other languages and language communities. Mouton de Gruyter. New York, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110869484.229 PMCid:PMC1301783
  • Hagstrom, W.O. (1965). The Scientific Community. New York; Basic Books.
  • Hands, D. W. (2001). Reflection without rules. Economic methodology and contemporary science theory. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511612602
  • Herzberg, F.; Mausner, B.; Snyderman, B. (1959). Motivation at work. New York; Wiley.
  • Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior: an introduction to behavior theory. Oxford; Appleton-Century. PMid:16578092 PMCid:PMC1078614
  • Hwang, K. (2005). The inferior science and the dominant use of English in knowledge production: a case study of Korean science and technology. Science Communication, vol. 26 (4), 390-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547005275428
  • Hwang, K. (2013). Effects of the language barrier on processes and performance of international scientific collaboration. Collaborators' participation, organizational integrity, and interorganizational relationships. Science Communication, vol. 35 (1), 3-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547012437442
  • Kozlowski, S. W. J.; Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In: Klein, K. J.; Kozlowski, S. W. J. (editors) Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. Jossey-Bass. San Francisco, USA.
  • Lam, A. (2011). What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: 'Gold', 'ribbon' or 'puzzle'? Research Policy, vol. 40, 1354-1368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.002
  • Lawler, E. E. (1971). Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view. New York; McGraw-Hill.
  • Lepper, M. R.; Greene, D.; Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the "overjustification" hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 28 (1), 129-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0035519
  • Levin, S. G.; Stephan, P. E. (1991). Research productivity over the life cycle: evidence for academic scientists. American Economic Review, vol. 81 (1), 114–132.
  • Lillis, T.; Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: the politics and practices of publishing in English. London; Routledge.
  • Long, J. S.; Fox, M. F. (1995). Scientific careers: universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 21, 45-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.21.080195.000401
  • Martin, E. (2004). Vignettes and respondent debriefing for questionnaire design and evaluation. In: Presser, S. et al. (editors), Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New Jersey, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471654728.ch8
  • Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago; The University of Chicago Press.
  • Mirowski, Ph. (1996). A visible hand in the marketplace for ideas. In: Power, M. (editor) Accounting and science. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.
  • Mirowski, Ph.; Sent, E. M. (2002). Science bought and sold: essays in the economics of science. Chicago and London; The Chicago University Press.
  • Moreno, A. I. (2010). Researching into English for research publication purposes from an applied intercultural perspective. In Ruiz-Garrido, M. F. et al. (editors) English for Professional and Academic Purposes. Rodopi. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Moreno, A.I.; Rey-Rocha, J.; Burgess, S.; López-Navarro, I.; Sachdev, I. (2012). Spanish researchers' perceived difficulty writing research articles for English-medium journals: the impact of proficiency in English versus publication experience. Ibérica, vol. 24, 157-184.
  • Moreno, A. I.; Burgess, S.; Sachdev, I.; López-Navarro, I.; Rey-Rocha, J. (2013). The ENEIDA Questionnaire: Publication Experiences in Scientific Journals in English and Spanish. Retrieved [20.05.2014] from Universidad de León, ENEIDA's Web site: http://eneida.unileon.es/eneidaquestionnaire.php
  • Mulkay, M. (1969). Some aspects of cultural growth in the natural sciences. Social Research, vol. 36, 22-52.
  • Mulkay, M. (1980). Interpretation and the use of rules: The case of norms of science. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 39 (1), 111-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2164-0947.1980.tb02772.x
  • Opsahl, R. L.; Dunnette, M. D. (1966). The role of financial incentives in industrial motivation. Psychological Bulletin, vol. 66, 95–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0023614
  • Ostroff, C.; Bowen, D. E. (2000). Moving HR to a higher level: Human resource practices and organizational effectiveness. In: Klein, K. J.; Kozlowski, S. W. J. (editors) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations. Jossey-Bass. San Francisco, USA. PMCid:PMC2640917
  • Osuna, C.; Cruz-Castro, L.; Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2011). Overturning some assumptions about the effects of evaluation systems on publication performance. Scientometrics, vol. 86, 575-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0312-7
  • Pérez-Llantada, C.; Plo, R.; Ferguson, G. R. (2011). "You don't say what you know, only what you can": The perceptions and practices of senior Spanish academics regarding research dissemination in English. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 30 (1), 18–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.05.001
  • Petersen, M.; Shaw, P. (2002). Language and disciplinary differences in a biliterate context. World Englishes, vol. 21 (3), 357-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00255
  • Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge. Chicago; The University of Chicago Press.
  • Radnitzky, G. (1987). The economic approach to the philosophy of science. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 38, 159-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjps/38.2.159
  • Rey-Rocha, J.; Martín-Sempere, M.J. (1999). The role of domestic journals in geographically-oriented disciplines: the case of Spanish journals on Earth Sciences. Scientometrics, vol. 45 (2), 203-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02458433
  • Rothman, M. (1972). A dissenting view on the scientific ethos. The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 23, 102-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/588160
  • Rowley, J. (1996). Motivation and academic staff in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, vol. 4 (3), 11-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09684889610125814
  • Ryan, R. M.; Connell, J. P.; Deci, E. L. (1985). A motivational analysis of self-determination and self-regulation in education. In: Ames, C.; Ames, R. E. (editors) Research on motivation in education: The classroom milieu. Academic Press. New York, USA.
  • Ryan, R. M.; Deci, E. L. (2000a). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, vol. 55, 68–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 PMid:11392867
  • Ryan, R. M.; Deci, E. L. (2000b). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 25 (1), 54–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 PMid:10620381
  • Scott, W. R. (2005). Institutional theory: contributing to a theoretical research program. In: Smith, K. G.; Hitt, M. A. (editors) Great minds in management: the process of theory development. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412952552.n155
  • Shi, Y. (2001). The economics of scientific knowledge: a rational-choice neo-institutionalist theory of science. Cheltenham, UK; Edward Elgar.
  • Silva, L.C. (1997). Cultura estadística e investigación científica en el campo de la salud: una mirada crítica. Madrid; Díaz de Santos.
  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York; Macmillan.
  • Stephan, P. E.; Levin, S. G. (1992). Striking the mother lode in science: the importance of age, place and time. New York; Oxford University Press.
  • Stephan, P. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 34 (3), 1199–1235.
  • Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: explorations and applications. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524827
  • Swales, J.; Leeder, C. (2012). A reception study of the articles published in English for Specific Purposes from 1990–1999. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 31 (2), 137-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.07.003
  • Thune, T. (2007). University-industry collaboration: the network embeddedness approach. Science and Public Policy, vol. 34 (3), 158-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/030234207X206902
  • Uzuner, S. (2008). Multilingual scholars' participation in core/global academic communities: A literature review. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 7, 250-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.007
  • Vallerand, R. J.; Pelletier, L. G.; Blais, M. R.; Brière, N. M.; Senécal, C.; Vallières, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: a measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 52, 1003-1017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025
  • Wible, J. R. (1998). The economics of science: methodology and epistemology as if economics really mattered. London; Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203176979
  • Zamora-Bonilla, J. (2012). The economics of scientific knowledge. In Mäki, U. (editor) Philosophy of economics. Elsevier. Amsterdam, The Netherlands. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-51676-3.50027-0
La source de données: Dialnet