The Joint Effects of Imagined Contact and Similarity with the Protagonist of Testimonial Messages Through Identification and Transportation

Referencias bibliográficas

• Citas Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., & Highberger, L. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.105
• Boeijinga, A., Hoeken, H., & Sanders, J. (2017). Risk versus planning health narratives targeting Dutch truck drivers: obtaining impact via different routes? International Journal of Communication, 11, 5007–5026. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6449/2209
• Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2017). Conditional processes of effective instructor communication and increases in students’ cognitive learning. Communication Education, 66(2), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1241889
• Boyle, M. P. & Schmierbach, M. (2015). Applied communication research methods. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Braddock, K. & Dillard, J. P. (2016). Meta-analytic evidence for the persuasive effect of narratives on beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Communication Monographs, 83(4), 446–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1128555
• Braverman, J. (2008). Testimonials versus informational persuasive messages: the moderating effect of delivery mode and personal involvement. Communication Research, 35(5), 666–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208321785
• Cea D’Ancona, M. A., & Valles, M. S. (2014). Evolución del racismo, la xenofobia y otras formas conexas de intolerancia en España (Informe-Encuesta 2014) (Evolution of racism, xenophobia and other related intolerance in Spain (Report-Survey 2014)). Madrid: Ministerio de Empleo y Seguridad Social.
• Chen, M., Bell, R. A., & Taylor, L. D. (2016). Narrator point of view and persuasion in health narratives: the role of protagonist–reader similarity, identification, and self-referencing. Journal of Health Communication, 21(8), 908–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1177147
• Chung, A. H. & Slater, M. D. (2013). Reducing stigma and out-group distinctions through perspective-taking in narratives. Journal of Communication, 63(5), 894–911. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12050
• Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: a theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
• Cohen, J. (2014). Mediated relationships and social life: current research on fandom, parasocial relationships, and identification. In M. B. Oliver & A. A. Raney (Eds.), Media and social life (pp. 142–156). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Cohen, J. & Tal-Or, N. (2017). Antecedents of identification: character, text, and audiences. In F. Hakemulder, M. M. Kuijpers, E. S. Tan, K. Bálint, & M. M. Doicaru (Eds.), Narrative absorption (pp. 133-153). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
• Cohen, J., Tal-Or, N., & Mazor-Tregerman, M. (2015). The tempering effect of transportation: Exploring the effects of transportation and identification during exposure to controversial two-sided narratives. Journal of Communication, 65(2), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12144
• Cohen, J., Weimann-Saks, D., & Mazor-Tregerman, M. (2018). Does character similarity increase identification and persuasion? Media Psychology, 21(3), 506–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1302344
• Crisp, R. J. & Husnu, S. (2011). Attributional processes underlying imagined contact effects. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(2), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210390721
• Crisp, R. J. & Turner, R. N. (2009). Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. The American Psychologist, 64(4), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014718
• de Graaf, A. (2014). The effectiveness of adaptation of the protagonist in narrative impact: similarity influences health beliefs through self-referencing. Human Communication Research, 40(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12015
• de Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., & Beentjes, J. W. J. (2012). Identification as a mechanism of narrative persuasion. Communication Research, 39(6), 802–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211408594
• de Graaf, A., Sanders, J., & Hoeken, H. (2016). Characteristics of narrative interventions and health effects: a review of the content, form, and context of narratives in health-related narrative persuasion research. Review of Communication Research, 4, 88–131. https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2016.04.01.011
• De Wit, J. B., Das, E., & Vet, R. (2008). What works best: objective statistics or a personal testimonial? An assessment of the persuasive effects of different types of message evidence on risk perception. Health Psychology, 27(1), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.110
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
• Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model. Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000004
• Green, M. C. & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
• Harwood, J. (2010). The contact space: a novel framework for intergroup contact research. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09359520
• Harwood, J., Joyce, N., Chen, C.-Y., Paolini, S., Xiang, J., & Rubin, M. (2017). Effects of past and present intergroup communication on perceived fit of an outgroup member and desire for future intergroup contact. Communication Research, 44(4), 530–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565926
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
• Hayes, A. F. & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028
• Hoeken, H., Kolthoff, M., & Sanders, J. (2016). Story perspective and character similarity as drivers of identification and narrative persuasion. Human Communication Research, 42(2), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12076
• Husnu, S. & Crisp, R. J. (2010). Elaboration enhances the imagined contact effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 943-950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.014
• Husnu, S. & Crisp, R. J. (2015). Perspective-taking mediates the imagined contact effect. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 44, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.11.005
• Igartua, J. J. (2010). Identification with characters and narrative persuasion through fictional feature films. Communications. The European Journal of Communication Research, 35(4), 347-373. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2010.019
• Igartua, J. J. & Barrios, I. (2012). Changing real-world beliefs with controversial movies: processes and mechanisms of narrative persuasion. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 514–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01640.x
• Igartua, J. J. & Cheng, L. (2009). Moderating effect of group cue while processing news on immigration. Is framing effect a heuristic process? Journal of Communication, 59(4), 726-749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01454.x
• Igartua, J. J. & Fiuza, D. (2018). Persuading with narratives against gender violence. Effect of similarity with the protagonist on identification and risk-perception. Palabra Clave, 21(2), 499–523. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2018.21.2.10
• Igartua, J. J. & Frutos, F. J. (2017). Enhancing attitudes toward stigmatized groups with movies: Mediating and moderating processes of narrative persuasion. International Journal of Communication, 11, 158–177. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5779
• Igartua, J. J., Guerrero-Martín, I., Cachón-Ramón, D., & Rodríguez de Dios, I. (2018). Efecto de la similitud con el protagonista de narraciones contra el racismo en las actitudes hacia la inmigración. El rol mediador de la identificación con el protagonista (Effect of Similarity with the Protagonist of Narratives Against Racism in Attitudes Toward Immigration. The Mediating Role of Identification with the Protagonist). Disertaciones. Anuario Electrónico de Estudios de Comunicación Social, 11(1), 56-75. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/disertaciones/a.5272
• Kaufman, G. F. & Libby, L. K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027525
• Kim, M. (2019). When similarity strikes back: conditional persuasive effects of character-audience similarity in anti-smoking campaign. Human Communication Research, 45(1), 52–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqy013
• Kim, H. S., Bigman, C. A., Leader, A. E., Lerman, C., & Cappella, J. N. (2012). Narrative health communication and behavior change: the influence of exemplars in the news on intention to quit smoking. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01644.x
• Kim, H. K. & Lee, T. K. (2017). Conditional effects of gain–loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change. Journal of Health Communication, 22(12), 990–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2017.1396629
• Kim, H. K. & Shapiro, M. A. (2016). When bad things happen to a protagonist like you: the role of self in resistance to negatively framed health narratives. Journal of Health Communication, 21(12), 1227–1235. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1240268
• Kim, M., Shi, R., & Cappella, J. N. (2016). Effect of character–audience similarity on the perceived effectiveness of antismoking PSAs via engagement. Health Communication, 31(10), 1193–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1048421
• Kim, N. & Wojcieszak, M. (2018). Intergroup contact through online comments: effects of direct and extended contact on outgroup attitudes. Computers and Human Behavior, 81, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.013
• Krogstad, J. M. (2015, September 24). What Americans, Europeans think of immigrants. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org
• Lindsay, R. M. & Ehrenberg, A. S. (1993). The design of replicated studies. The American Statistician, 47(3), 217-228. https://doi.org/10.2307/2684982
• Kreuter, M. W., Green, M. C., Cappella, J. N., Slater, M. D., Wise, M. E., Storey, D., … Woolley, S. (2007). Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33(3), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02879904
• Meleady, R., Seger, C. R., & Vermue, M. (2017). Examining the role of positive and negative intergroup contact and anti-immigrant prejudice in Brexit. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(4), 799-808. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12203
• Miles, E. & Crisp, R. J. (2013). A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213510573
• Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
• Moyer-Gusé, E., Chung, A. H., & Jain, P. (2011). Identification with characters and discussion of taboo topics after exposure to an entertainment narrative about sexual health. Journal of Communication, 61(3), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01551.x
• Oliver, M. B., Dillard, J. P., Bae, K., & Tamul, D. J. (2012). The effect of narrative news format on empathy for stigmatized groups. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699012439020
• Park, S.-Y. (2012). Mediated intergroup contact: concept explication, synthesis, and application. Mass Communication and Society, 15(1), 136–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.558804
• Pettigrew, T. F. & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
• Reeves, B. & Geiger, S. (1994). Designing experiments that assess psychological responses to media messages. In A. Lang (Ed.), Measuring psychological responses to media messages (pp. 165-180). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Reeves, B., Yeykelis, L., & Cummings, J. J. (2016). The use of media in media psychology. Media Psychology, 19(1), 49-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.1030083
• Saleem, M., Yang, G. S., & Ramasubramanian, S. (2016). Reliance on direct and mediated contact and public policies supporting outgroup harm. Journal of Communication, 66(4), 604–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12234
• Schreiner, C., Appel, M., Isberner, M. B., & Richter, T. (2018). Argument strength and the persuasiveness of stories. Discourse Processes, 55(4), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2016.1257406
• Shen, L. (2011). The effectiveness of empathy-versus fear-arousing antismoking PSAs. Health Communication, 26(5), 404–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.552480
• Shen, L. (2018). Features of empathy–arousing strategic messages. Health Communication, 34(11), 1329-1339. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1485078
• Slater, M., Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). Message variability and heterogeneity: a core challenge for communication research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 39(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11679170
• Slater, M. D. & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x
• Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Tal-Or, N. & Cohen, J. (2010). Understanding audience involvement: conceptualizing and manipulating identification and transportation. Poetics, 38(4), 402-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2010.05.004
• Tal-Or, N. & Cohen, J. (2016). Unpacking engagement: convergence and divergence in transportation and identification. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40(1), 33–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11735255
• Tarrant, M. & Hadert, A. (2010). Empathic experience and attitudes toward stigmatized groups: evidence for attitude generalization. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(7), 1635-1656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00633.x
• Tukachinsky, R. (2014). Experimental manipulation of psychological involvement with media. Communication Methods and Measures, 8(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2013.873777
• Tukachinsky, R. & Tokunaga, R. S. (2013). The effects of engagement with entertainment. Communication Yearbook, 37(1), 287–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679153
• Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (Vol. 2) (pp. 77–121). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
• Turner, R. N., Crisp, R. J., & Lambert, E. (2007). Imagining intergroup contact can improve intergroup attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(4), 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207081533
• Walter, N. & Cohen, J. (2019). When less is more and more is less: the paradoxical metacognitive effects of counterarguing. Communication Monographs, 86(3), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1580378
• Walter, N., Murphy, S. T., Frank, L. B., & Baezconde-Garbanati, L. (2017). Each medium tells a different story: the effect of message channel on narrative persuasion. Communication Research Reports, 34(2), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2017.1286471
• Walter, N., Murphy, S. T., & Gillig, T. K. (2018). To walk a mile in someone else’ s shoes: how narratives can change causal attribution through perceived interactivity. Human Communication Research, 44(1), 31-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcre.12112
• Wojcieszak, M. & Azrout, R. (2016). I saw you in the news: mediated and direct intergroup contact improve outgroup attitudes. Journal of Communication, 66(6), 1032–1060. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12266
• Wojcieszak, M., Azrout, R., Boomgaarden, H., Alencar, A. P., & Sheets, P. (2017). Integrating Muslim immigrant minorities: the effects of narrative and statistical messages. Communication Research, 44(4), 582–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215600490
• Wojcieszak, M. & Kim, N. (2016). How to improve attitudes toward disliked groups: the effects of narrative versus numerical evidence on political persuasion. Communication Research, 43(6), 785–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215618480
• Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin, T., & Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 73–90. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/1997-04812-006