Privacidad, seguridad y legalidad en soluciones educativas basadas en BlockchainUna Revisión Sistemática de la Literatura

  1. Daniel Amo Filvà 1
  2. Marc Alier 2
  3. Francisco José García-Peñalvo 3
  4. David Fonseca 1
  5. María José Casañ 2
  1. 1 Universitat Ramon Llull, URL (España)
  2. 2 Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, UPC (España)
  3. 3 Universidad de Salamanca, USAL (España)
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
RIED: revista iberoamericana de educación a distancia

ISSN: 1138-2783

Año de publicación: 2020

Título del ejemplar: Analítica del aprendizaje y educación basada en datos: Un campo en expansión

Volumen: 23

Número: 2

Páginas: 213-236

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5944/RIED.23.2.26388 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: RIED: revista iberoamericana de educación a distancia

Resumen

La Analítica del Aprendizaje (proveniente del término en inglés Learning Analytics) procesa los datos de los estudiantes, incluso los estudiantes menores de edad. El ciclo analítico consiste en recoger datos, almacenarlos durante largos períodos y utilizarlos para realizar análisis y visualizaciones. A mayor cantidad de datos, mejores resultados en el análisis. Este análisis puede ser descriptivo, predictivo e, incluso, prescriptivo, lo que implica la gestión, el tratamiento y la utilización de datos personales. El contexto educativo es, por lo tanto, muy sensible, a diferencia de los contextos individuales en los que el análisis se utiliza a voluntad. No está claro cómo están utilizando los datos de los estudiantes las empresas de tecnología que dan servicio en educación y a quiénes realmente se les beneficia, cómo esto afectará a los estudiantes en un futuro a corto y largo plazo, o qué nivel de privacidad o seguridad se aplica para proteger los datos de los estudiantes. Por consiguiente, y en relación con lo expuesto, el análisis de datos educativos implica un contexto sensible y de fragilidad en la gestión y análisis de datos personales de los estudiantes, incluidos menores, en el que hay que maximizar las precauciones. En esta revisión sistemática de la literatura se explora la importancia de la protección y seguridad de los datos personales en el campo de la educación mediante las promesas emergentes de los interesados en usar la tecnología blockchain. Los resultados denotan que es importante entender las implicaciones y riesgos derivados de usar tecnologías emergentes en educación, su relación con la sociedad y la legalidad vigente.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Al-Zaben, N., Onik, M. M. H., Yang, J., Lee, N. Y., & Kim, C. S. (2019). General Data Protection Regulation Complied Blockchain Architecture for Personally Identifiable Information Management. Proceedings - 2018 International Conference on Computing, Electronics and Communications Engineering, ICCECE 2018, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/iCCECOME.2018.8658586
  • Amo, D. (2018). Tesis Daniel Amo Filvà - Revisión Sistemática Literatura. Retrieved from https://lasalleuniversities-my.sharepoint.com/:x:/g/personal/daniel_amo_salle_url_edu/EQoQGKr7zuBIpYkA0gB4mGoBEP7NCufbBjhkURpKOAklyQ?e=0cjvVO
  • Amo, D., & Santiago, R. (2017). Learning Analytics: la narración del aprendizaje a través de los datos. Editorial UOC. Barcelona: UOC.
  • Apostolaki, M., Zohar, A., & Vanbever, L. (2017). Hijacking Bitcoin: Routing Attacks on Cryptocurrencies. Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2017.29
  • Arenas, R., & Fernandez, P. (2018). CredenceLedger: A Permissioned Blockchain for Verifiable Academic Credentials. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE/ITMC 2018 - Proceedings, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2018.8436324
  • Bacon, J., Michels, J. D., Millard, C., & Singh, J. (2018). Blockchain Demystified: a technical and legal introduction to distributed and centralised ledgers. Richmond Journal of Law & Technology, XXV(1), 1–106. Retrieved from https://jolt.richmond.edu/files/2018/11/Michelsetal-Final-1.pdf
  • Bdiwi, R., Runz, C. de, Faiz, S., & Cherif, A. A. (2017). Towards a New Ubiquitous Learning Environment Based on Blockchain Technology. 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 101–102. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2017.37
  • Bore, N., Karumba, S., Mutahi, J., Darnell, S. S., Wayua, C., & Weldemariam, K. (2017). Towards Blockchain-enabled school information hub. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F1320, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3136560.3136584
  • Chatti, M. A., Dyckhoff, A. L., Schroeder, U., & Thüs, H. (2012). A reference model for learning analytics. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5–6), 318–331. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051815
  • Chen, G., Xu, B., Lu, M., & Chen, N.-S. (2018). Exploring blockchain technology and its potential applications for education. Smart Learning Environments, 5(1), 1-FALTA PÁG FINAL. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-017-0050-x
  • Conti, M., Sandeep, K. E., Lal, C., & Ruj, S. (2018). A survey on security and privacy issues of bitcoin. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 20(4), 3416–3452. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018.2842460
  • Cruz-Benito, J., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Therón, R. (2019). Analyzing the software architectures supporting HCI/HMI processes through a systematic review of the literature. Telematics and Informatics, 38, 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.09.006
  • Dai, F., Shi, Y., Meng, N., Wei, L., & Ye, Z. (2017). From Bitcoin to cybersecurity: A comparative study of blockchain application and security issues. 2017 4th International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI), 975–979. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSAI.2017.8248427
  • Dima, G. A., Jitariu, A. G., Pisa, C., & Bianchi, G. (2018). Scholarium: Supporting Identity Claims Through a Permissioned Blockchain. IEEE 4th International Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry, RTSI 2018 - Proceedings, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/RTSI.2018.8548407
  • Drescher, D. (2017). Blockchain Basics. Apress.
  • Duan, B., Zhong, Y., & Liu, D. (2018). Education application of blockchain technology: Learning outcome and meta-diploma. Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems - ICPADS, 2017-Decem, 814–817. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPADS.2017.00114
  • Farah, J. C., Vozniuk, A., Rodriguez-Triana, M. J., & Gillet, D. (2018). A blueprint for a blockchain-based architecture to power a distributed network of tamper-evident learning trace repositories. Proceedings - IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT, 218–222. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2018.00059
  • Flanagan, B., & Ogata, H. (2018). Learning analytics platform in higher education in Japan. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 10(4), 469–484.
  • Gervais, A., Karame, G. O., Wüst, K., Glykantzis, V., Ritzdorf, H., & Čapkun, S. (2016). On the security and performance of Proof of Work blockchains. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 24-28-Octo, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2978341
  • Gilda, S., & Mehrotra, M. (2018). Blockchain for Student Data Privacy and Consent. 2018 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics, ICCCI 2018, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCI.2018.8441445
  • Gong, X., Liu, X., Jing, S., Xiong, G., & Zhou, J. (2019). Parallel-Education-Blockchain Driven Smart Education: Challenges and Issues. Proceedings 2018 Chinese Automation Congress, CAC 2018, 2390–2395. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAC.2018.8623198
  • Han, M., Wu, D., Li, Z., Xie, Y., He, J. S., & Baba, A. (2018). A novel blockchain-based education records verification solution. SIGITE 2018 - Proceedings of the 19th Annual SIG Conference on Information Technology Education, 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1145/3241815.3241870
  • Herold, B. (2014). InBloom to Shut Down Amid Growing Data-Privacy Concerns. Retrieved June 21, 2018, from Education Week website: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/DigitalEducation/2014/04/inbloom_to_shut_down_amid_growing_data_privacy_concerns.html
  • Joshi, A. P., Han, M., & Wang, Y. (2018). A survey on security and privacy issues of blockchain technology. Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 1(2), 121–147.
  • Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report, Ver. 2.3 EBSE Technical Report. EBSE, EBSE-2007-(School of Computer Science and Mathematics), 65. Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf
  • Mense, A., & Flatscher, M. (2018). Security Vulnerabilities in Ethereum Smart Contracts. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-Based Applications & Services, 375–380.
  • Millard, C. (2018). Blockchain and law: Incompatible codes? Computer Law & Security Review, 34(4), 843–846.
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  • Moubarak, J., Filiol, E., & Chamoun, M. (2018). On blockchain security and relevant attacks. 2018 IEEE Middle East and North Africa Communications Conference, MENACOMM 2018, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/MENACOMM.2018.8371010
  • Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. 1–9. Retrieved from https://www.bitcoincash.org/bitcoin.pdf
  • Neiva, F. W., David, J. M. N., Braga, R., & Campos, F. (2016). Towards pragmatic interoperability to support collaboration: A systematic review and mapping of the literature. Information and Software Technology, 72, 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.12.013
  • Ocheja, P., Flanagan, B., & Ogata, H. (2018). Connecting decentralized learning records: a blockchain based learning analytics platform. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170365
  • Pagallo, U., Bassi, E., Crepaldia, M., & Durante, M. (2018). Chronicle of a clash foretold: Blockchains and the GDPR’s right to erasure. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 313, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-81
  • Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. In Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
  • Soni, A., & Maheshwari, S. (2018). A Survey of Attacks on the Bitcoin System. 2018 IEEE International Students’ Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science, SCEECS 2018, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCEECS.2018.8546925
  • Soomro, A. B., Salleh, N., Mendes, E., Grundy, J., Burch, G., & Nordin, A. (2016). The effect of software engineers’ personality traits on team climate and performance: A Systematic Literature Review. Information and Software Technology, 73, 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2016.01.006
  • Srivastava, A., Bhattacharya, P., Singh, A., Mathur, A., Prakash, O., & Pradhan, R. (2019). A Distributed Credit Transfer Educational Framework based on Blockchain. Proceedings - 2018 2nd International Conference on Advances in Computing, Control and Communication Technology, IAC3T 2018, 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/IAC3T.2018.8674023
  • Sun, H., Wang, X., & Wang, X. (2018). Application of Blockchain Technology in Online Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 13(10), 252-FALTA PÁG. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i10.9455
  • Turcu, C., Turcu, C., & Chiuchișan, I. (2018). Blockchain and its Potential in Education. International Conference on Virtual Learning - ICVL, Alba Iulia.
  • Turkanović, M., Hölbl, M., Košič, K., Heričko, M., & Kamišalić, A. (2018). EduCTX: A blockchain-based higher education credit platform. IEEE Access, 6, 5112–5127. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2789929
  • Williamson, B. (2017). Decoding ClassDojo: psycho-policy, social-emotional learning and persuasive educational technologies. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(4), 440–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2017.1278020
  • Xu, Y., Zhao, S., Kong, L., Zheng, Y., Zhang, S., & Li, Q. (2017). ECBC: A high performance educational certificate blockchain with efficient query. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 10580 LNCS, 288–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67729-3_17
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet