Reading sentences in spanishsome similarities and differences between children with dyslexia and those with deafness

  1. Alegria, Jesus 1
  2. Carrillo , Maria-Soledad
  3. Rueda, Mercedes I.
  4. Domínguez Gutiérrez, Ana Belén
  1. 1 Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)
Revista:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728,  1695-2294

Año de publicación: 2020

Título del ejemplar: May - September

Volumen: 36

Número: 2

Páginas: 295-303

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.6018/ANALESPS.396841 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Otras publicaciones en: Anales de psicología

Resumen

Este estudio compara las estrategias para leer oraciones utilizadas por un grupo de escolares con dislexia (n = 107) y un grupo con sordera e implante coclear (n = 61) de lengua castellana. Los resultados indican que solo los participantes con sordera adoptan la estrategia de palabras clave (EPC), que consiste en identificar algunas de las palabras de la oración con contenido semántico propio, e ignorar las palabras funcionales. Se observa además que el uso de la EPC está asociado con un déficit sintáctico. Por otra parte, cuando los dos grupos se emparejan en el nivel lector con niños con desarrollo típico en lectura (Grupo Control, n = 785), las diferencias entre los Grupos Disléxico y Control desaparecieron. Sin embargo, los niños con sordera mantenían su tendencia a usar la EPC y seguían presentando dificultades para procesar las palabras funcionales. Estos resultados excluyen la hipótesis de que la EPC sea un procedimiento utilizado de forma general para compensar los déficits de lectura, pareciendo depender, más específicamente, de dificultades en la capacidad sintáctica

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovaci?n y Universidades (Proyecto PGC2018-094565-B-I00).

Financiadores

    • PGC2018-094565-B-I00

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aaron, P.G., Keetay, V., Boyd, M. Palmatier, S., & Wacks, J. (1998). Spelling without phonology: A study of deaf and hearing children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 1-22. doi: 10.1023/A:1007917929226
  • Cantiani, C., Lorusso, M. L., Guasti, M. T., Sabisch, B., & Männel, C. (2013). Characterizing the morphosyntactic processing deficit and its relationship to phonology in developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 51, 1595-1607. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.04.009
  • Cantiani, C., Lorusso, M. L., Perego, P., Molteni, M., & Guasti, M. T. (2015). Developmental dyslexia with and without language impairment: ERPs reveal qualitative differences in morphosyntactic processing. Developmental Neuropsychology, 40(5), 291-312. doi:10.1080/87565641.2015.1072536
  • Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Tracking the unique effects of print exposure in children: Associations with vocabulary, general knowledge, and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 264–274. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.264
  • Delage, H., & Durrleman, S. (2018). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Distinct syntactic profiles? Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 32(8), 1-28. doi:10.1080/02699206.2018.1437222
  • Domínguez, A. B., & Alegría, J. (2010). Reading mechanisms in orally educated deaf adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15, 136-148. doi:10.1093/deafed/enp033
  • Domínguez, A. B., Carrillo, M. S., González, V., & Alegría, J. (2016). How do deaf children with and without cochlear implants manage to read sentences: The key word strategy. Journal of Deaf Studies and Dead Education, 21, 280-292. doi:10.1093/deafed/enw026
  • Domínguez, A. B., Carrillo, M. S., Pérez, M., & Alegría, J. (2014). Analysis of reading strategies in deaf adults as a function of their language and meta-phonological skills. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 1439- 1456. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.039
  • Gaustad, M. G., & Kelly, R. R. (2004). The relationship between reading achievement and morphological word analysis in deaf and hearing students matched for reading level. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9, 269-285. doi:10.1093/deafed/enh030
  • Geers A. E., & Hayes, H. (2010). Reading, writing, and phonological processing skills of adolescents with 10 or more years of cochlear implant experience. Ear and Hearing, 32, 49S–59S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181fa41fa
  • Geers, A., Tobey, E., Moog, J., & Brenner, C. (2008). Long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in the preschool years: From elementary grades to high school. International Journal of Audiology, 47(Suppl 2), S21–S30. doi:10.1080/14992020802339167
  • Hammer, A. (2010). The acquisition of verbal morphology in cochlear-implanted and specific language impaired children. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden, Utrecht, the Netherlands, LOT.
  • Herman, R., Kyle, F.E. & Roy, P. (2019) Literacy and phonological skills in oral deaf children and hearing children with a history of dyslexia. Reading Research Quarterly, 0(0), 1-23. doi:10.1002/rrq.244
  • Herman, R., & Roy, P. (2016). Dyslexia and deafness. In M. Marschark & P. Spencer (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies in Language, (pp. 344-356). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • King, C. M., & Quigley, S. (1985). Reading and deafness. San Diego: College-Hill Press.
  • Le Normand M. T., & Moreno-Torres I. (2014). The role of linguistic and environmental factors on grammatical development in French children with cochlear implants. Lingua, 139, 26–38. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2013.02.012
  • Marín, J., & Carrillo, M. S. (1999). Test Colectivo de Eficacia Lectora (TECLE) [Collective Test of Reading Efficiency]. Universidad de Murcia. Available in A. Cuadro, D. Costa, D. Trias, & P. Ponce de León (2009). Evaluación del nivel lector. Manual técnico del test de Eficacia Lectora (TECLE) [Evaluation of reading level. Technical manual of reading efficiency test]. Montevideo, Uruguay: Prensa Médica Latinoamericana
  • Marschark, M., Sarchet, T., Rothen, C., & Zupan, M. (2010). Will cochlear implants close the reading achievement gap for deaf students? In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language, and Education. Vol.2. (pp. 127-143). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Miller, P. (2005). Reading comprehension and its relation to the quality of functional hearing: Evidence from readers with different functional hearing abilities. American Annals of the Deaf, 150, 305–323. doi:10.1353/aad.2005.0031
  • Miller, P. (2007). The role of spoken and sign language in the retention of written words by prelingually deafened native signers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12, 184–208. doi:10.1093/deafed/enl031
  • Mohammed, T., Campbell, R., Macsweeney, M., Barry, F., & Coleman, M. (2006). Speech-reading and its association with reading among deaf, hearing and dyslexic individuals. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 20, 621-630. doi:10.1080/02699200500266745
  • Moreno-Pérez, F. J., Saldaña, D., & Rodríguez-Ortiz, I. R. (2015). Reading efficiency of deaf and hearing people in Spanish. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 20, 374–384. doi:10.1093/deafed/env030
  • Niederberger, N. (2007). L’apprentissage de la lecture–écriture chez les enfants sourds. [Reading and writing acquisition in deaf children]. Enfance, 59, 254-262. doi:10.3917/enf.593.0254
  • Noordenbos, M. W., & Serniclaes, W. (2015). The categorical perception deficit in dyslexia: A meta-analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19, 340-359. doi:10.1080/10888438.2015.1052455
  • Paul, P. (1998). Literacy and deafness: The development of reading, writing, and literature thought. Boston, Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Perfetti, Ch. A., & Lesgold, A. M. (1977). Discourse comprehension ans sources of individual differences. In M. A Just & P. A. Carpenter (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension, (pp. 141-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Perfetti, Ch., Goldman, S. R., & Hogaboam, T. W. (1979) Reading skill and identification of words in discourse context. Memory & Cognition 7, 273-282. doi:10.3758/BF03197600
  • Rodríguez, J. M., García, J., & Torres, S. (1997). El uso de estrategias sintácticas en sujetos sordos The use of syntactic strategies in deaf people. Revista de Psicología del Lenguaje, 2, 117-135. Retrieved from http://alfama.sim.ucm.es/wwwisis2/ wwwisis.exe/[in=psyke2.in]/?format=breve&boolean=[NR:11358009]
  • Roy, P., Shergold, Z., Kyle, F.E., & Herman, R. (2015). Spelling in oral deaf and hearing dyslexic children: A comparison of phonologically plausible errors. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 36, 277-290. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014. 10.012
  • Serniclaes, W., Van Heghe, S., Mousty, Ph., Carré, R., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2004). Allophonic mode of speech perception in dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 87, 336-361. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2004.02.001
  • Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71. doi:10.2307/747348
  • Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407. doi:10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
  • Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1992). Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: The cognitive correlates of print exposure. Memory & Cognition, 20, 51-68. doi:10.3758/BF03208254
  • Stockseth, D. R. (2002). Comprensión de la sintaxis española por lectores sordos chilenos. Revista Signos, 35, 271-290. doi:10.4067/S0718-09342002005100017
  • Tallal, P. (1980). Auditory temporal perception, phonics and reading disabilities in children. Brain and Language, 9, 182-198. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(80)90139-X
  • Werker, J., & Tees, R. (1987). Speech perception in severely disabled and average reading children. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 48-61. doi:10.1037/h0084150
  • Wiseheart, R., Altmann, L.J.P., Park, H., & Lombardino, L. (2009). Sentence comprehension in young adults with developmental
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet