Public sector financial management and democracy qualityThe role of the accounting systems

Bibliographic References

• Altman, D., & Pérez-Liñán, A. (2002). Assessing the Quality of Democracy: Freedom, Competitiveness and Participation in Eighteen Latin American Countries. Democratization, 7, 85--100. https://doi.org/10.1080/714000256
• Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277--297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
• Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variables estimation of error components models. Journal of Economics, 68, 29--51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
• Aversano, N., & Manes-Rossi, F. (2017). The democratic participation of local governments: A survey on Italian local governments web sites. In Cuadrado- Ballesteros, B. & García-Sánchez, I.M. (Eds.), Local Governments in the Digital era: Looking for Accountability (pp. 55--72). New York: Nova Publisher. ISBN: 978-1-63485-891-5
• Barton, A. (2009). The Use and Abuse of Accounting in the Public Sector Financial Management Reform Program in Australia. Abacus, 45, 221-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00283.x
• Baum, C., Schaffer, M., & Stillman, S. (2003). Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. Stata Journal, 3, 1--31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0300300101
• Beetham, D. (2004). Freedom as the Foundation. Journal of Democracy, 15, 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2004.0057
• Behn, R. D. (2001). Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctvdf03r8
• Bellanca, S., & Vandernoot, J. (2014). International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) Implementation in the European Union (EU) Member States. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 10, 257-269. https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6583/2014.03.001
• Benito, B., Brusca, I., & Montesinos, V. (2007). The harmonization of government financial information systems: The role of the IPSAS. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73, 293--317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852307078424
• Bergmann, A. (2009). Public Sector Financial Management. Essex, Prentice Hall - Pearson Education Limited. ISBN: 978-0-273-71354-8
• Biondi, Y. (2014). Harmonising European Public Sector Accounting Standards (EPSAS): Issues and perspectives for Europe's economy and society. Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, 4, 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2017-0014
• Biondi, Y., & Soverchia, M. (2014). Accounting rules for the European Communities: A theoretical analysis. Accounting, Economics and Law, 4, 179--214. https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2013-0063
• Blöndal, J. R. (2003). Accrual Accounting and Budgeting: Key Issues and Recent Developments. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 3, 43-131. https://doi.org/10.1787/16812336
• Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2003). Evaluating the quality of public governance: indicators, models and methodologies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69, 313- 328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852303693002
• Bühlmann, M., Merkel, W., Müller, L., & Weßels, B. (2012). The democracy barometer: a new instrument to measure the quality of democracy and its potential for comparative research. European Political Science, 11, 519-536. https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2011.46
• Caperchione, E. (2006). The New Public Management -- a perspective for finance practitioners. Brussels, FEE. Available at: https://www.accountancyeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/The_New_Public_Management_A_Perspective_for_Finance_Practitioners_0612112200611033.pdf
• Caruana, J., Brusca, I., Caperchione, E., Cohen, S., & Manes-Rossi, F. (2019). Exploring the Relevance of Accounting Frameworks in the Pursuit of Financial Sustainability of Public Sector Entities: A Holistic Approach. In Caruana, J., Brusca, I., Caperchione, E., Cohen, S. and Manes-Rossi, F. (eds. by), Financial Sustainability of Public Sector Entities. The Relevance of Accounting Frameworks. Switzerland, Palgrave MacMillan (pp. 1-18). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06037-4_1
• Chan, J.L. (2003). Government accounting: an assessment of theory, purposes and standards. Public Money & Management, 23, 13--20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00336
• Christiaens, J., Vanhee, C., Manes-Rossi, F., Aversano, N., & Van Cauwenberge, P. (2015). The effect of IPSAS on reforming governmental financial reporting: an international comparison. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81, 158-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314546580
• Cohen, S., Mamakoua, X.J., & Karatzimas, S. (2017). IT-enhanced popular reports: Analyzing citizen preferences. Government Information Quarterly, 34, 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.04.003
• Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Citro, F., & Bisogno, M. (2019). The role of public-sector accounting in controlling corruption: an assessment of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, In press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318819756
• Da Cruz, N., Ferreira, T., Marques, A.F., Cunha, R., Susana, J., & de Sousa, L. (2016). Measuring local government transparency. Public Management Review, 18, 866-893. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1051572
• Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN: 9780300015652
• Dahl, R.A. (1998). On democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN: 9780300194463
• Dahlberg, S., Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B., Khomenko, A., & Svensson, R. (2017). The Quality of Government Basic Dataset, version Jan17. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute, http://doi.org/10.18157/QoGBasJan17
• Diamond, L., & Morlino, L. (2004). The quality of democracy. An overview. Journal of Democracy, 15, 20-31. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2004.0060
• European Commision (EC). (2016). EU e-Government Action Plan 2016--2020: Accelerating the digital transformation of government. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52016DC0179 [Accessed at 13.3.2018].
• Glaeser, E. L., Ponzetto, G. A., & Shleifer, A. (2007). Why does democracy need education? Journal of Economic Growth, 12, 77-99. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-007-9015-1
• Harrison, T.M., & Sayogo, S.D. (2014). Transparency, participation, and accountability practices in open government: A comparative study. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 513--525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.08.002
• Heo, U., & Tan, A. C. (2001). Democracy and economic growth: A causal analysis. Comparative Politics, 33, 463-473. https://doi.org/10.2307/422444
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69, 1, 3--19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
• Hood, C. (1995). The 'New public management' in the 1980s -- Variations on a Theme. Accounting, Organization and Society, 20, 93--109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W
• IMF (2018). Fiscal Transparency Handbook. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. http://dx.doi.org/10.5089/9781484331859.069
• Inglehart, R. (2003). How Solid is Mass Support for Democracy? And How can we Measure it? Political Science & Politics, 36, 51--57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096503001689
• Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2014). Introduction to Comparative Public Administration. Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. ISBN-13: 978-1783473595
• Lapsley, I., R. Mussari, G., & Paulsson, G. (2009). On the Adoption of Accrual Accounting in the Public Sector: A Self-Evident and Problematic Reform. European Accounting Review, 18, 719-723. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180903334960
• Li, Q., & Reuveny, R. (2003). Economic globalization and democracy: An empirical analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 33, 29-54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123403000024
• Li, Q., & Reuveny, R. (2009). Democracy and Economic Openness in an Interconnected System. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804953
• Muller, E. N. (1995). Economic determinants of democracy. American Sociological Review, 60, 966-982. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096435
• Munck, G. L., & Verkuilen, J. (2002). Conceptualizing and measuring democracy. Evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies, 35, 5-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041400203500101
• Mussari, R. (2014). EPSAS and the Unification of Public Sector Accounting Across Europe. Accounting, Economics and Law: A Convivium, 4, 299-312. https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2014-0019
• O'Donnell, G. A. (2004). Why the rule of law matters. Journal of Democracy, 15, 32-46. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2004.0076
• OECD (1995). Governance in transition: public management reforms in OECD countries, Paris, PUMA/OECD. ISBN-13: 978-9264144866
• OECD/IFAC (2017). Accrual Practices and Reform Experiences in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270572-en [Accessed 30.6.2017].
• Oulasvirta, L. (2014). The reluctance of a developed country to choose International Public Sector Accounting Standards of the IFAC. A critical case study. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25, 272-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.12.001
• Papenfuß, U., & Schaefer, C. (2010). Improving public accountability by aligning reporting to organizational changes in public service provision. An empirical Internet study of all Austrian, German and Swiss towns and states from an agency-theory perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76, 555-576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852310372451
• Pindado, J., & Requejo, I. (2015). Panel data: A methodology for model specification and testing. In Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, Vol. 4, Finance. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317.weom040013
• Pollit, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis -- Into the Age of Austerity. Fourth edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press. ISBN-13: 978-0198795179
• PwC, (2014). Collection of information related to the potential impact, including costs, of implementing accrual accounting in the public sector and technical analysis of the suitability of individual IPSAS standards - 2013/S 107-182395. Available at: [Accessed 6.2.2018]
• Roje, G., Vašiček, D., & Vašiček, V. (2010). Accounting regulation and IPSAS implementation: Efforts of transition countries toward IPSAS compliance. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 6, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6583/2010.12.001
• Sutcliffe, P. (2003). The standards programme of IFAC's public sector committee. Public Money & Management, 23, 29--36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00338
• Tagesson, T. (2015). Accounting reforms, standard setting and compliance. In Budding, T., Grossi, G. and Tagesson, T. (eds by), Public Sector Accounting. London, Routdledge (pp. 8-22). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315848389
• Teorell, J. (2010). Determinants of democratization: Explaining regime change in the world, 1972--2006. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762727
• Vanhanen, T. (2003). Democratization: A Comparative Analysis of 170 Countries. Routledge, New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203614501
• Wang, X. (2002). Assessing administrative accountability. American Review of Public Administration, 32, 350--370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074002032003005
• Warren, M. (2014). Accountability and democracy. In Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E. & Schillemans, T. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641253.013.0018
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: The MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262232586