Las ciencias sociales e ingenieriles desde el realismo constructivo de Ronald Giere

  1. Cuevas Badallo, Ana 1
  2. Torres González, Obdulia 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Revista:
Artefactos

ISSN: 1989-3612

Ano de publicación: 2021

Título do exemplar: Reflexiones en torno a la filosofía de Ronald N. Giere

Volume: 10

Número: 1

Páxinas: 107-120

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.14201/ART2021101107120 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Artefactos

Resumo

The constructive realism upholded by Ronald Giere can be used for a better understanding of the features of two fields of scientific research that tend to be demeaned by the traditional philosophical conceptions: social and engineering knowledge. Here we will argue that these two areas share relevant features, and that Giere’s modelistic proposal can be used to carry out a better analysis of their peculiarities. We will emphasize, on the one hand, his modelistic conception of science, and his consideration that models are similar to the world, and on the other, how this position affects the choice between theories. Specifically, we will deal with the special nature of laws in the social and engineering sciences, as well as the criteria by which scientists in these fields choose between different possible models. 

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Gibson, Quentin (1982). La lógica de la investigación social. Madrid: Tecnos.
  • Giere, Ronald (1988). Explaining science: a Cognitive Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  • Giere, Ronald (1999). Science without laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Giere, Ronald (2004). How Models Are Used to Represent Reality. Philosophy of Science, 71, 742-752.
  • Gómez Rodríguez, Amparo (2001). Las leyes ceteris paribus y la inexactitud de la economía. Teorema, 20(3), 69-80.
  • Gómez Rodríguez, Aamparo (2003). Filosofía y metodología de las ciencias sociales. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Hobbes, Thomas (1651/1983). Leviatán. Madrid: Sarpe.
  • Mill, John Stuart (1836/1967). On the Definition of Political Economy; and on the Method of Philosophical Investigation in that Science. En J. S. Mill Essays on Economics and Society, editado por J. M. Robson, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Morgan, Mary (2006). Economic Man as Model Man: Ideal Types, Idealization and Caricatures. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 28(1), 1-27.
  • Moulines, C. Ulises (1982). Exploraciones metacientíficas. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Roberts, John (2004). There are no laws of the social Science. En Christopher Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science. New Jer- sey: Blackwell.