Tendencias de los artículos académicos sobre TIC y web social en el período 2013-2017

  1. Valeriano Piñeiro-Naval
  2. Ricardo Morais
Journal:
Cuadernos.Info

ISSN: 0719-3661

Year of publication: 2021

Issue: 48

Pages: 1-26

Type: Article

DOI: 10.7764/CDI.48.27791 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Cuadernos.Info

Abstract

This paper aims to understand the way in which ICTs and the social web, main agents of the current digital society, have been studied in academic articles. The goal is, therefore, to make a balance of the research published in the Spanish and Latin American journals with the greatest impact, indexed in Scimago Journal & Country Rank in the category of Communication, during the five-year period 2013-2017. To do this, we methodologically triangulated bibliometric research and content analysis, which allowed to consider aspects such as the authorship or the articles’ funding, as well as to identify the objects of study, theories, and the most used methodologies in the 425 manuscripts of the sample. In light of the results, it is possible to state that scientific production experiments permanent growth throughout the time series analyzed. The modal pattern of the works’ authorship, which usually lacks additional funding, is up to three authors, something that denotes the collaborative nature of this investigation. From an instrumental point of view, the studies are mostly empirical and centered on the analysis of messages. Finally, regarding the comparison between the manuscripts included in the Spanish and Latin American journals, there are significant differences in terms of parameters such as the impact factor, the use of quantitative or qualitative methods, and the epistemological paradigms in which the articles are included

Bibliographic References

  • Citas Arcila-Calderón, C., Barbosa-Caro, E., & Cabezuelo-Lorenzo, F. (2016). Técnicas big data: análisis de textos a gran escala para la investigación científica y periodística. El Profesional de la Información, 25(4), 623-631. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.jul.12.
  • Arcila-Calderón, C., Álvarez, M., & Vicente-Mariño, M. (2019). Distributed Supervised Sentiment Analysis of Tweets: Integrating Machine Learning and Streaming Analytics for Big Data Challenges in Communication and Audience Research. Empiria: Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, 42, 113-136. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.42.2019.23254.
  • Bakan, U., & Han, T. (2019). Research and Trends in the Field of Social Media from 2012 to 2016: A Content Analysis of Studies in Selected Journals. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 25(1), 13-31. https://doi.org/10.5209/ESMP.63713.
  • Ballesteros, C.A., & Díez-Garrido, M. (2018). We need to talk. Engagement 2.0 on Facebook during the Spanish cyber campaign of December 20, 2015. Communication & Society, 31(1), 169-193.
  • Ballesteros, C.A. (2019). La representación digital del engagement: hacia una percepción del compromiso a través de acciones simbólicas. Revista de Comunicación, 18(1), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC18.1-2019-A11.
  • Bauman, Z. (2009). Modernidad líquida. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Borah, P. (2017). Emerging communication technology research: Theoretical and methodological variables in the last 16 years and future directions. New Media & Society, 19(4), 616-636. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815621512.
  • Boyd, D.M., & Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083.6101.2007.00393.x.
  • Brake, D.R. (2014). Are we all online content creators now? Web 2.0 and digital divides. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 591-609. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12042.
  • Canavilhas, J. (2015). Nuevos medios, nuevo ecosistema. El Profesional de la Información, 24(4), 357-362. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.jul.01.
  • Castells, M. (1999a). Internet y la sociedad red. Lección inaugural del programa de doctorado sobre la sociedad de la información y el conocimiento de la UOC. Recuperado de: https://bit.ly/2OA99yd.
  • Castells, M. (1999b). La revolución de la tecnología de la información. ¿Cuál revolución? Recuperado de: https://bit.ly/2MeBAnQ.
  • Castells, M. (2006). Informacionalismo, redes y sociedad red: una propuesta teórica. In M. Castells (Ed.), La Sociedad Red: una visión global (pp. 27-75). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum.
  • Coleman, S. (2017). Can the internet strengthen democracy? Democratic futures. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Colorado, A. (2010). Perspectivas de la cultura digital. Zer, Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, 15(28), 103-115.
  • Costa-Sánchez, C. (2017). Análisis de la productividad y visibilidad en Scopus de los investigadores españoles en Comunicación. Observatorio (OBS*), 11(3), 1-16.
  • Dahlgren, P. (2014). Social Media and Political Participation. Discourse and Deflection. In C. Fuchs & M. Sandoval (ed.) Routledge Studies in Science, Technology and Society: Critique, Social Media and the Information Society (pp. 191-202) London: Routlegde.
  • Data Reportal (2019). Digital 2019: Q2 Global Digital Statshot. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2Lms9SP.
  • De-la-Peza, M.C. (2013). Los estudios de comunicación: disciplina o indisciplina. Comunicación y Sociedad, 20, 11-32.
  • Denzin, N.K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186.
  • Denzin, N.K. (2015). Triangulation. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeost050.pub2.
  • Escribà, E., & Cortiñas, S. (2013). La internacionalización y las coautorías en las principales revistas científicas de Comunicación en España. Comunicar, 21(41), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.3916/C41-2013-03.
  • Fernández-Quijada, D., & Masip, P. (2013). Tres décadas de investigación española en comunicación: hacia la mayoría de edad. Comunicar, 21(41), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.3916/C41-2013-01.
  • Fuchs, C. (2017). Information Technology and Sustainability in the Information Society. International Journal of Communication, 11, 2431–2461.
  • Guiote, A. (2011). Entre los bastidores del conocimiento 2.0: el perfil, las reflexiones y las rutinas de acción de los constructores del contenido en Wikipedia. Zer, Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, 16(30), 13-36.
  • Hayes, A.F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664.
  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York: New York University Press.
  • Johann, M., & Bülow, L. (2019). One Does Not Simply Create a Meme: Conditions for the Diffusion of Internet Memes. International Journal of Communication, 13, 1720-1742.
  • Johnson, B.T., Scott-Sheldon, L.A.J., Snyder, L.B., Noar, S.M., & Huedo-Medina, T.B. (2008). Contemporary approaches to meta-analysis in communication research. In A.F. Hayes, M.D. Slater, & L.B. Snyder (Eds.), The SAGE Sourcebook of Advanced Data Analysis Methods for Communication Research (pp. 311-347). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
  • Kaplan, A.M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
  • Kim, S.T., & Weaver, D. (2002). Communication research about the Internet: A thematic meta-analysis. New Media & Society, 4(4), 518-538. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144402321466796.
  • Kim, Y., Kim, B., Kim, Y., & Wang, Y. (2017). Mobile communication research in communication journals from 1999 to 2014. New Media & Society, 19(10), 1668-1691. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817718162.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis. Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2011). Agreement and information in the reliability of coding. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(2), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2011.568376.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2017). Reliability. In J. Matthes, C.S. Davis & R.F. Potter (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0210.
  • López-García, X., Silva-Rodríguez, A., Vizoso-García, Á.A., Westlund, O., & Canavilhas, J. (2019). Periodismo móvil: Revisión sistemática de la producción científica. Comunicar, 27(59), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.3916/C59-2019-01.
  • Magro, M.J. (2012). A Review of Social Media Use in E-Government. Administrative Sciences 2, 148-161. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci2020148.
  • Martínez-Nicolás, M., Saperas, E., & Carrasco-Campos, Á. (2019). La investigación sobre comunicación en España en los últimos 25 años (1990-2014). Objetos de estudio y métodos aplicados en los trabajos publicados en revistas españolas especializadas. Empiria, 42, 37-69. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.42.2019.23250.
  • Martínez-Rolán, X., & Piñeiro-Otero, T. (2016). The use of memes in the discourse of political parties on Twitter: analysing the 2015 state of the nation debate. Communication & Society, 29(1), 145-159.
  • Neuendorf, K.A. (2016). The content analysis guidebook (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
  • O’Reilly, T. (2007). What is web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & Strategies, 65, 17-37.
  • Olsson, T. (2014). The Architecture of Participation. For Citizens or Consumers? In C. Fuchs & M. Sandoval (Ed.), Routledge Studies in Science, Technology and Society: Critique, Social Media and the Information Society (pp. 203-215). London: Routlegde.
  • Pejanović-Djurišić, M., Gavrilovska, L., & Fratu, O. (2017). Special Issue: ICT Trends for Future Smart World. Wireless Personal Communications, 92(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3886-4.
  • Peng, T.Q., Zhang, L., Zhong, Z.J., & Zhu, J.J.H. (2012). Mapping the landscape of Internet Studies: Text mining of social science journal articles 2000-2009. New Media Society, 15(5), 644-664. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462846.
  • Pérez-Salazar, G. (2011). La web 2.0 y la sociedad de la información. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 56(212), 57-68.
  • Pérez-Tornero, J.M. (2008). La sociedad multipantallas: retos para la alfabetización mediática. Comunicar, 16(31), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.3916/c31-2008-01-002.
  • Piñeiro-Naval, V., & Mangana, R. (2018). Teoría del encuadre: Panorámica conceptual y estado del arte en el contexto hispano. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 24(2), 1541-1557. https://doi.org/10.5209/ESMP.62233.
  • Piñeiro-Naval, V., & Mangana, R. (2019). La presencia del framing en los artículos publicados en revistas hispanoamericanas de comunicación indexadas en Scopus. Palabra Clave 22(1), 117-142. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2019.22.1.6.
  • Piñeiro-Otero, T., & Martínez-Rolán, X. (2016). Memes in the Internet feminist activism. #ViajoSola as an example of transnational mobilization. Cuadernos.info, 39, 17-37. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.39.1040.
  • Ramos, I., del Pino, C., & Castelló, A. (2014). Web 2.0 y redes sociales: estudio de las publicaciones científicas en las revistas españolas de comunicación. Historia y Comunicación Social, 19(Nº Esp. Enero), 577-590. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2014.v19.44986.
  • Recuero, R. (2017). Introdução à análise de redes sociais online. Salvador da Bahia: EDUFBA.
  • Salaverría, R (2015). Ideas para renovar la investigación sobre medios digitales. El Profesional de la Información, 24(3), 223-226. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.may.01.
  • Shang, S.S.C., Li, E.Y., Wu, Y.L., & Hou, O.C.L. (2011). Understanding web 2.0 service models: a knowledge-creating perspective. Information & Management, 48, 178-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2011.01.005.
  • Valenzuela, S., Arriagada, A., & Scherman, A. (2014). Facebook, Twitter, and youth engagement: A quasi-experimental study of social media use and protest behavior using propensity score matching. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2046-2070.
  • Vilches, L. (1997). De la audiencia de los medios al usuario interactivo. Pensamiento Educativo, 21, 125-150.
  • Vinader, R., Abuín, N., & García, A. (2011). Competencias digitales. El impacto de la web 2.0 en los perfiles profesionales del sector audiovisual. Revista Telos, 87, en línea. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/2HZwoPk.
  • Walter, N., Cody, M.J., & Ball-Rokeach, S.J. (2018). The Ebb and Flow of Communication Research: Seven Decades of Publication Trends and Research Priorities. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 424-440. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx015.
Data source: Dialnet