Factores que influyen en la comprensión lectora de hipertexto

  1. Gabriel Herrada Valverde 2
  2. Rosario Isabel Herrada Valverde 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

  2. 2 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Journal:
Ocnos: revista de estudios sobre lectura

ISSN: 2254-9099,  1885-446X

Year of publication: 2017

Volume: 16

Issue: 2

Pages: 7-16

Type: Article

DOI: 10.18239/OCNOS_2017.16.2.1287 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Ocnos: revista de estudios sobre lectura

Abstract

This paper revises some of the most significant studies about hypertext reading. With the aim of determining the main factors and variables that influence reading comprehension of such textual format, some definitions of hypertext are provided, and the aspects that affect the characteristics of each hypertext document such as the node granularity, the number and type of links, its overall structure, and navigation aids, are analyzed in detail. In addition, specific tasks and processes associated with reading comprehension of hyperlink text are revised, with particular emphasis on the selection of reading order, which is the process that differentiates the multilinear reading of hypertext and the linear reading of printed text. According to the analysis, it can be concluded that these factors will have different effects in terms of the cognitive load of the readers according to their domain knowledge. In this regard, it is noted that the textual cohesion is an element of great importance to understand hypertext for those readers with low knowledge domain.

Bibliographic References

  • Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545-561. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.3.545.
  • Amadieu, F., & Salmerón, L. (2014). Concept maps for comprehension and navigation of hypertexts. En D. Ifenthaler, & R. Hanewald (Eds.), Digital knowledge maps in education (pp. 41-59). New York: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3178-7_3.
  • Amadieu, F., Tricot, A., & Mariné, C. (2009). Prior knowledge in learning from a non-linear electronic document: Disorientation and coherence of the reading sequences. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 381-388. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.017.
  • Bezdan, E., Kester, L., & Kirschner, P.A. (2013). The influence of node sequence and extraneous load induced by graphical overviews on hypertext learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 870-880. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.016.
  • Burin, D., Barreyro, J.P., Saux, G., & Irrazábal, N.C. (2015). Navigation and Comprehension of Digital Expository Texts: Hypertext Structure, Previous Domain Knowledge, and Working Memory Capacity. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 13(37), 529-550. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.37.14136.
  • Calisir, F., Eryazici, M., & Lehto, M.R. (2008). The effects of text structure and prior knowledge of the reader on computer-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 439-450. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.032.
  • Codina, L. (2001). El diseño de la navegación en hipertexto informativos. Temes de Disseny, 18, 39-48.
  • De Jong, T., & Van der Hulst, A. (2002). The effects of graphical overviews on knowledge acquisition in hypertext. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(2), 219-231. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.00229.x.
  • Flores-Carrasco, P.G., Díaz-Mújica, A., & Lagos-Herrera, I.E. (2017). Comprensión de textos en soporte digital e impreso y autorregulación del aprendizaje en grupos universitarios de estudiantes de educación, Revista Electrónica Educare, 21(1), 1-17. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.15359/ree.21-1.7.
  • Gutierrez-Braojos, C., & Salmerón-Pérez, H. (2012). Estrategias de comprensión lectora: enseñanza y evaluación en educación primaria. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 16(1), 183-202.
  • Iriarte, F. (2004). Influencia de diferentes tipos de hipertextos en la comprensión lectora. (Tesis inédita de doctorado). Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca.
  • Jáñez, A. (2014). Efectos de las instrucciones de lectura sobre la comprensión y navegación de hipertextos en sujetos con bajo conocimiento de dominio. (Tesis inédita de doctorado). Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca.
  • Jáñez, A., & Rosales, J. (2016). Novices' need for exploration: Effects of goal specificity on hypertext navigation and comprehension. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 121-130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.058.
  • Landow, G.P. (2006). Hypertext 3.0. Critical theory and new media in an era of Globalization. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
  • Lawless, K.A., Brown, S.W., Mills, R., & Mayall, H.J. (2003). Knowledge, interest, recall and navigation: A look at hypertext processing. Journal of Literacy Research, 35, 911-934. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3503_5.
  • Li, L-Y., Tseng, S-T., & Chen, G-D. (2016). Effect of hypertext highlighting on browsing, reading, and navigational performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 318-325. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.012.
  • Lin, D.M. (2003). Hypertext for the aged: Effects of text topologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 201-209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00045-6.
  • Madrid, R.I. (2010). Hacia un modelo de comprensión del hipertexto: el papel de las estrategias de lectura y la carga cognitiva. (Tesis inédita de doctorado). Universidad de Granada, Granada. Recuperado de: http://digibug.ugr.es/bitstream/10481/5584/1/18811255.pdf
  • Madrid, R.I., & Cañas, J. (2009). The effect of reading strategies and prior knowledge on cognitive load and learning with hypertext. The Ergonomics Open Journal, 2, 124-132. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1875934300902010124.
  • Madrid, R.I., Van Oostendorp, H., & Puerta, M.C. (2009). The effects of the number of links and navigation support on cognitive load and learning with hypertext: The mediating role of reading order. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 66-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.06.005.
  • Müller-Kalthoff, T., & Möller, J. (2003). The effects of graphical overviews, prior knowledge and self-concept on hypertext disorientation and learning achievement. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(2), 117-134.
  • Nielsen, J. (1996). Multimedia and hypertext: Internet and beyond. New York: Academic Press.
  • Nielsen, J. (2012). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Jakob Nielsen´s Alertbox. Recuperado de: http://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/
  • Nilsson, R.M., & Mayer, R.E. (2002). The effects of graphic organizers giving cues to the structure of a hypertext document on users´ navigation strategies and performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 1-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2002.1011.
  • Parush, A., Shwartz, Y., Shtub, A., & Chandra, M. J. (2005). The impact of visual layout factors on performance in web pages: a cross-language study. Human Factors, 47(1), 141–157. doi: https://doi.org/10.1518/0018720053653785.
  • Pérez-Abril, M., & Roa-Casas, C. (2014). Aproximación a los fundamentos de la prueba pisa-Lectura y algunas consideraciones en relación con la política curricular de Colombia. Pedagogía y Saberes, 41, 23-35. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.17227/01212494.41pys23.35.
  • Potelle, H., & Rouet, J.F. (2003). Effects of content representation and readers’ prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human Computers Studies, 58(3), 327-345. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00016-8.
  • Rouet, J.F., & Britt, M.A. (2011). Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension. En M.T. McCrudden, J.P. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Relevance instruction and goal-focusing in text learning (pp. 19-52). Greenwich, CT: Information age publishing.
  • Salmerón, L. (2006). Estrategias de comprensión de textos en hipertextos. (Tesis inédita de doctorado). Universidad de Granada. Recuperado de: http://hera.ugr.es/tesisugr/16098158.pdf
  • Salmerón, L., Baccino, T., Cañas, J.J., Madrid, R. I., & Fajardo, I. (2009). Do graphical overviews facilitate or hinder comprehension in hypertext? Computers & Education, 53(4), 1308-1319. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.013.
  • Salmerón, L., Cañas, J., Kintsch, W., & Fajardo, I. (2005). Reading Strategies and Hypertext Comprehension. Discourse Processes, 40(3), 171-191. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp4003_1.
  • Salmerón, L., Kintsch, W., & Cañas, J. (2006a). Reading strategies and prior knowledge in learning from hypertext. Memory and Cognition, 34(5), 1157-1171. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193262.
  • Salmerón, L., Kintsch, W., & Cañas, J. (2006b). Coherence or interest as basis for improving hypertext comprehension. Information Design Journal, 14(1), 45-55. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1075/idj.14.1.06sal.
  • Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Vollmann, B., & Cantrambone, R. (2009). The impact of learner characteristics on information utilization strategies, cognitive load experienced, and performance in hypermedia learning. Learning and Instruction 19(5), 387-401. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.004.
  • Sullivan, S.A., & Puntambekar, S. (2015). Learning with digital texts: Exploring the impact of prior domain knowledge and reading comprehension ability on navigation and learning outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 299-313. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.016.
  • Vörös, Z., Rouet, J.F., & Pléh, C. (2011). Effect of high-level content organizers on hypertext learning, Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 2047-2055. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.005.
  • Waniek, J., & Ewald, K. (2008). Cognitive costs of navigation aids in hypermedia learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(2), 185-204. doi: https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.39.2.e.
  • Zanotto, M., & Gaeta, M.L. (2017). Creencias epistemológicas, lectura de múltiples textos y aprendizaje en doctorandos de Pedagogía. Revista Mexicana de Investigacion Educativa, 74(22), 949-976.
Data source: Dialnet