Estudio exploratorio sobre acoso escolar en alumnado con altas capacidadesprevalencia y afectación psicológica

  1. Joaquín González-Cabrera 1
  2. Javier Tourón 1
  3. Juan Manuel Machimbarrena 1
  4. Ana León-Mejía 1
  5. Mónica Gutiérrez-Ortega 1
  1. 1 Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad Internacional de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/029gnnp81

Revista:
Revista de educación

ISSN: 0034-8082

Año de publicación: 2019

Número: 386

Páginas: 187-214

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2019-386-432 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de educación

Resumen

Introducción: Las características diferenciales del alumnado de altas capacidades pueden hacerlo vulnerable al acoso. La evidencia empírica sobre violencia escolar y altas capacidades es escasa y aún no explorada en el contexto español. El objetivo principal es conocer la prevalencia del bullying, su distribución en los diferentes roles y la relación con otras variables psicológicas. Metodología: Estudio transversal y analítico con 285 alumnos (Mage=11.77; SD=2.28; range 9-18) con altas capacidades de todo el territorio español (175 varones, 61.6%). Se utilizaron las versiones españolas del European Bullying Intervention Project Questionnaire, Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scales-21, Interpersonal Support Evaluation List y KIDSCREEN-10. Resultados: El 50.9% está implicado en el acoso escolar, siendo el 39.6% víctimas, el 1.1% agresores y el 10.2% víctimas-agresoras. Las víctimas-agresoras y las víctimas presentan peores puntuaciones en calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (p<.001), depresión (p<.001), estrés (p<.001) y ansiedad (p<.001) que los no implicados. Discusión: Este trabajo proporciona evidencia empírica sobre la alta prevalencia de la victimización entre los estudiantes de altas capacidades españoles. Ser una víctima o una víctima-agresora muestra un impacto en el bienestar psicológico y particularmente cuando se trata de calidad de vida relacionada con la salud, estrés, ansiedad y depresión.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Esta investigación ha sido financiada por la Universidad Internacional de la Rioja dentro del Plan Propio de Investigación 4 [2017-2019]. También ha sido financiado por el proyecto RTI2018- 094212-B-I00 por el Programa Estatal de I+D+I Orientada a los retos de la Sociedad.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aboujaoude, E., Savage, M. W., Starcevic, V., & Salame, W. O. (2015). Cyberbullying: review of an old problem gone viral. Journal of Adolescent Health, 57(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jadohealth.2015.04.011.
  • Albdour, M., & Krouse, H. J. (2014). Bullying and victimization among African American adolescents: A literature review. Journal of child and adolescent psychiatric nursing, 27(2), 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jcap.12066.
  • Berne, S., Frisen, A., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Naruskov, K., Luik, P., et al. (2013). Cyberbullying assessment instruments: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(2), 320-334. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.022.
  • Brighi, A., Ortega, R., Pyzalski, J., Scheithauer, H., Smith, P. K., Tsormpatzoudis, C., …Thompson, J. (2012). European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire – ECIPQ [Unpublished questionnaire]. Retrieved from bullyingandcyber.net.
  • Brighi, A., Ortega, R., Pyzalski, J., Scheithauer, H., Smith, P. K., Tsormpatzoudis, C., …Thompson, J. (2012). European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire – ECIPQ [Unpublished questionnaire]. Retrieved from bullyingandcyber.net.
  • Calvete, E., Fernández-González, L., González-Cabrera, J. M., & GámezGuadix, M. (2017). Continued Bullying Victimization in Adolescents: Maladaptive Schemas as a Mediational Mechanism. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1–11. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0677-5.
  • Castelló, A., & Batlle, C. (1998). Aspectos teóricos e instrumentales en la identificación del alumno superdotado y talentoso. Propuesta de un protocolo. FAISCA, 6, 26-66.
  • Clark, B. (2012). Growing up gifted (8th Ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
  • Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357. http://doi. org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310.
  • Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 65– 83. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0020149.
  • Dalosto, M. D. M., & Alencar, E. M. (2013). Manifestações e prevalência de bullying entre alunos com altas habilidades/superdotação. Revista Brasileira de Educação Especial, 19(3), 363-378.
  • Daza, P., Novy, D., Stanley, M., & Averill, P. (2002). The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21: Spanish translation and Validation with a Hispanic sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 24, 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016014818163.
  • Demaray, M. K., & Malecki, C. K. (2003). Perceptions of the frequency and importance of social support by students classified as victims, bullies, and bully/victims in an urban middle school. School Psychology Review, 32, 471–489.
  • Díaz-Aguado, M. J., Martínez, R., & Martín, J. (2013). El acoso entre adolescentes en España: Prevalencia, papeles adoptados por todo el grupo y características a las que atribuye la victimización. Revista de Educación, 362, 348-379. https://doi.org/10-4438/1988-592XRE-2011-362-164.
  • Erwin, J. (2015). Prevalence and Impact of Peer Victimization Among Gifted Adolescents (Doctoral Dissertation). University of California, Berkeley, United States.
  • Estell, D. B., Farmer, T. W., Irvin, M. J., Crowther, A., Akos, P., & Boudah, D. J. (2009). Students with exceptionalities and the peer group context of bullying and victimization in late elementary school. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18(2), 136–150. http://doi.org/10.1007/ s10826-008-9214-1.
  • Festl, R., Vogelgesang, J., Scharkow, M., & Quandt, T. (2017). Longitudinal patterns of involvement in cyberbullying: Results from a Latent Transition Analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 7–15. http:// doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.027.
  • Francis, R., Hawes, D. J., & Abbott, M. (2016). Intellectual giftedness and psychopathology in children and adolescents: A systematic literature review. Exceptional Children, 82(3), 279–302. http://doi. org/10.1177/0014402915598779.
  • Gagné, F. (2015). From genes to talent: the DMGT/CMTD perspective. Revista de Educación, 368, 12–37. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988- 592X-RE-2015-368-289.
  • Garaigordobil, M., & Martínez-Valderrey, V. (2014). Cyberprogram 2.0. Un Programa de intervención para la prevenir y reducir el ciberbullying. Madrid: Pirámide.
  • Garaigordobil, M., Martínez-Valderrey, V., & Aliri, J. (2014). Victimización, percepción de la violencia y conducta social. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 37(1), 90–116. http://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2014.881651.
  • Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2013). Bullied children and psychosomatic problems: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 132, 720-729. https://doi. org/10.1542/peds.2013-0614.
  • González-Cabrera, J., Balea, A., Vallina, M., Moya, A., & Laviana, O. (2017). Informe ejecutivo del Proyecto CIBERASTUR [CYBERASTUR project executive report]. Consejería de Educación y Cultura del Principado de Asturias. https://goo.gl/wLxQ6i.
  • Harris, J. R. (1995). Where is the child’s environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review, 102(3), 458–489. http:// doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.458.
  • Haslam, S., Ellemers, N., Reicher, S. D., Reynolds, K., & Schmitt, M. (2010). The social identity perspective today: An overview of its defining ideas. Rediscovering Social Identity. In T. Postmes, & N. R. Branscombe (Eds.), Rediscovering Social Identity: Core Sources (pp. 341-356). New York: Psychology Press.
  • Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty Years’ Research on Peer Victimization and Psychosocial Maladjustment: A Meta-analytic Review of Cross-sectional Studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(4), 441–455. http://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00629
  • Hidalgo-Rasmussen, C., Molina, T., Molina, R., Sepúlveda, R., Martínez, V., Montaño, R., Gonález, E., & George, M. (2015). Influence of bullying on the quality of life perception of Chilean students. Revista Médica de Chile, 143(6), 716-723.
  • Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2013). Social influences on cyberbullying behaviors among middle and high school students. Journal of youth and adolescence, 42(5), 711-722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012- 9902-4
  • Holt, M. K., & Espelage, D. L. (2007). Perceived social support among bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(8), 984–994. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9153-3.
  • Holt, M. K., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Polanin, J. R., Holland, K. M., DeGue, S., Matjasko, J. L., … Reid, G. (2015). Bullying and Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis. Pediatrics, 135(2), e496–e509. –1864http://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014.
  • Hymel, S., McClure, R., Miller, M., Shumka, E., & Trach, J. (2015). Addressing school bullying: Insights from theories of group processes.  Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,  37(1), 16–24. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.008.
  • Jager, J., Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2017). II. More than just convenient: The scientific merits of homogeneous convenience samples. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 82(2), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.1111 / mono.12296.
  • Konishi, C., & Hymel, S. (2009). Bullying and Stress in Early Adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(3), 333–356. http://doi. org/10.1177/0272431608320126.
  • Margolin, L. (2018). Gifted Education and the Matthew Effect. In A. Böker and K. Horvath (Eds.), Begabung und Gesellschaft (pp. 165–182). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden: Wiesbaden, Germany.
  • Matthews, M. S., Ritchotte, J. A., & Jolly, J. (2014). What’s wrong with giftedness? Parents’ perceptions of the gifted label. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 24(4), 372– 393. doi:10.1080/0962 0214.2014.990225.
  • Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (2017). Bienestar de los estudiantes: resultados de PISA 2015. https://goo.gl/Egq2pU.
  • Modecki, K.L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A.G., Guerra, N.G., & Runions, K.C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55, 602– 611. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007.
  • Nakamoto, J., & Schwartz, D. (2009). Is peer victimization associated with academic achievement? A Meta-analytic Review. Social Development, 19, 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00539.x.
  • Oliveira, J. C., & Barbosa, A. J. G. (2012). Bullying among students with and without characteristics of giftedness.  Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica,  25(4), 747–755. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102- 79722012000400014.
  • Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Subotnik, R. F., & Worrell, F. C. (2015). Repensando las altas capacidades: una aproximación evolutiva. Revista de Educación, 368, 40-65.
  • Olweus, D. (1999). Norway. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J., Junger-Task, D. Olweus, R. Catalano, & P. Slee (Eds.) The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective (pp. 28–48). London, England: Routledge.
  • Oostenbroek, J., & Over, H. (2015). Young children contrast their behavior to that of out-group members. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, 234–241. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.05.009.
  • Ortega-Ruiz, R., Del Rey, R., & Casas, J. (2016). Evaluar el bullying y el cyberbullying validación española del EBIP-Q y del ECIP-Q. Psicología de la Educación, 22, 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2016.01.004.
  • Parker, P. (2011). Bullying and victimization rates among gifted and highachieving students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(4), 624–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321103400405.
  • Pelchar, T. K., & Bain, S. K. (2014). Bullying and victimization among gifted children in school-level transitions. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37, 319–336. http://doi.org/10.1177/ 0162353214552566.
  • Pérez-Fuentes, M. del C., Gázquez, J. J., Molero, M. del M., Soler, J., & Barragán, A. B. (2015). Valores interpersonales relacionados con el perfil de agresor y víctima en adolescentes. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 15(2), 229–239.
  • Peters, M. P., & Bain, S. K. (2011). Bullying and victimization rates among gifted and high achieving students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(4), 624–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321103400405.
  • Peterson, J. S. (2009). Myth 17: Gifted and talented individuals do not have unique social and emotional needs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 280–282. http://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346946.
  • Peterson, J. S., & Ray, K. E. (2006a). Bullying and the gifted: Victims, perpetrators, prevalence, and effects. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(2), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000305.
  • Peterson, J. S., & Ray, K. E. (2006b). Bullying among the gifted: The subjective experience. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(3), 252–269. https:// doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000305.
  • Pfeiffer, S. (2018). Giftedness and talent development in children and youth. In Paul Ward, Jan Maarten Schraagen, Julie Gore, & Emilie M. Roth (Eds.),The Oxford handbook of expertise. https://doi.org/10.1093/ oxfordhb/9780198795872.013.5.
  • Pouwels, J. L., Souren, P. M., Lansu, T. A. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2016). Stability of peer victimization: A meta-analysis of longitudinal research. Developmental Review, 40, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. dr.2016.01.001.
  • Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., & Telch, M. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse and Neglect, 34(4), 244–252. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.07.009.
  • Reijntjes, A., Thomaes, S., Kamphuis, J. H., Bushman, B. J., Reitz, E., & Telch, M. J. (2013). Youths’ displaced aggression against inand outgroup peers: An experimental examination. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(1), 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jecp.2012.11.010.
  • Renzulli, J. S, & Reis, S. M. (2018). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental approach for promoting creative productivity in young people. In Pfeiffer, S. I., Shaunessy-Dedrick, E., & Foley-Nicpon, M. (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of giftedness and talent. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
  • Rodríguez-Hidalgo, A. J., Alcívar, A., & Herrera-López, M. (2019). Traditional bullying and discriminatory bullying around special educational needs: Psychometric properties of two instruments to measure it. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(1), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16010142.
  • Ryoo, J. H., Wang, C., Swearer, S. M., & Park, S. (2017). Investigation of transitions in bullying/victimization statuses of gifted and general education students. Exceptional Children, 83(4), 396–411. http://doi. org/10.1177/0014402917698500.
  • Sadler GR, Lee H, Lim RS, Fullerton J. (2010). Recruiting hard-to-reach United States population sub-groups via adaptations of snowball sampling strategy. Nursing & Health Sciences, 12 (3), 369-374. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2010.00541.x.
  • Salmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: Implications for interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22(4), 453–459. http://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1999.0239.
  • Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1–15.
  • Save the Children (2016). Yo a eso no juego. Bullying y ciberbullying. Retrieved from https://www.savethechildren.es/sites/default/files/ imce/docs/yo_a_eso_no_juego.pdf.
  • Silverman, L. K. (2002). Asynchronous development. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 31–37). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • Smith, B., Dempsey, A., Jackson, S., Olenchak, R., & Gaa, J. (2012). Cyberbullying among Gifted Children. Gifted Education International, 28, 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429411427652.
  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social Psychology of Intergroup relations.  Annual Review of Psychology, 26(2000), 1–39. http://doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev. ps.33.020182.000245.
  • The KIDSCREEN Group Europe (2006). The KIDSCREEN Questionnaires. Quality of life questionnaires for children and adolescents. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.
  • Tourón, J. & Tourón, M. (2016). Identification of verbal and mathematical talent: The relevance of ‘out of level’ measurement. Anales de Psicología, 32(3), 638–651. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.3.259401.
  • Trujillo, H., Martos, F., & González-Cabrera, J. (2012). Adaptación al español del “Interpersonal Support Evaluation List” (ISEL). Universitas Psychologica, 3, 969–978.
  • Wang, J., Iannotti, R. J., & Nansel, T. R. (2009). School Bullying Among Adolescents in the United States: Physical, Verbal, Relational, and Cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(4), 368–375. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021.
  • Yuste, C. (1989). Batería de aptitudes diferenciales y generales. BADYG-S. Madrid: Manual técnico. Madrid: Ed. CEPE.
  • Zych, I., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Del Rey, R. (2015). Systematic review of theoretical studies on bullying and cyberbullying: Facts, knowledge, prevention, and intervention. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.10.001.
  • Zych, I., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Marín-López, I. (2016). Cyberbullying: a systematic review of research, its prevalence and assessment issues in Spanish studies. Psicología Educativa, 22, 5-18. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.pse.2016.03.002.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet