Ausência de assimilação de vozeamento no português como L2 por anglófonos – uma análise via Teoria da Otimidade

  1. Miley Antonia Almeida Guimarães 1
  1. 1 Universidade de São Paulo
    info

    Universidade de São Paulo

    São Paulo, Brasil

    ROR https://ror.org/036rp1748

Revista:
Estudos Linguísticos

ISSN: 1413-0939

Año de publicación: 2013

Volumen: 42

Número: 1

Páginas: 72-86

Tipo: Artículo

GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Estudos Linguísticos

Resumen

Este artigo trata da análise, via Teoria da Otimidade (PRINCE; MOLENSKY, 1993; MCCARTHY; PRINCE, 1995), da ausência de assimilação regressiva de vozeamento no português como segunda língua por aprendizes anglófonos. Verificou-se que o tempo de residência no Brasil foi o fator mais significativo para a produção do vozeamento da fricativa alveolar, embora a variação tenha persistido mesmo nos dados de falantes mais experientes, com tempo de residência no país superior a dez anos. Pela análise por meio do modelo baseado em restrições proposto pela Teoria da Otimidade, foi possível constatar a interação entre processos de marcação e de transferência do ranqueamento de restrições do inglês para a interlíngua do aprendiz

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ARCHANGELI, D. Introducing Optimality Theory. Annual Review of Anthropology, v. 28, p. 531-552, 1999. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 16 abr. 2011.
  • BISOL, L. (Org.). Introdução aos estudos de fonologia do português brasileiro. 4. ed. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 2005.
  • BOERSMA, P. How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences, v. 21, p. 43–58. University of Amsterdam, 1997.
  • BOERSMA, P; HAYES, B. Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry, v. 32, n. 1, p. 45-86, 2001.
  • BROSELOW, E.; CHEN, S.; WANG, C. The Emergence of the Unmarked in Second Language Phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, v. 20, p. 261-280, 1998.
  • CEBRIAN, J. Catalan obstruents and opacity: A case for representational ambisyllabicity. In: SMALLWOOD, C.; BÉJAR, S. (Ed.) Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, v. 17. Toronto: University of Toronto, 1999. p. 58-80.
  • DAVIDSON, L.; JUSCZYK, P.; SMOLENSKY, P. The initial and final states: theoretical implications and experimental explorations of Richness of the Base. In: KAGER, R.; PATER, J.; ZONNEVELD, W. (Org.) Constraints in Phonological Acquisition. Cambridge University Press, 2004. p. 321-368.
  • DEMUTH, K. Markedness and the development of prosodic structure. NELS, v. 25, p. 13-25, 1995.
  • ECKMAN, F. Markedness and the Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis. In: IOUP, G; WEINBERGER, S. H. (Org.) Interlanguage Phonology: The acquisition of a second language sound system. Cambridge: Newbury House Publishers, 1987. p. 55-69.
  • GIMSON, A. C.; CRUTTENDEN, A. Gimson’s Pronunciation of English. 7th edition. London: Hodder Education, 2008. ESTUDOS LINGUÍSTICOS, São Paulo, 42 (1): p. 72-86, jan-abr 2013 85
  • GNANADESIKAN, A. Markedness and faifhfulness constraints in child phonology. In: KAGER, R.; PATER, J.; ZONNEVELD, W. (Org.) Constraints in Phonology Acquisition. Cambridge University Press, 2004. p. 109-157.
  • GRIJZENHOUT. Voicing and devoicing in English, German, and Dutch: evidence for domain-specific identity constraints. Two papers on constraint domains. SFB 282 working paper no. 116. Düsseldorf: HHU, 2000.
  • HANCIN-BHATT, B. Second Language Phonology in Optimality Theory. In: HANSEN EDWARDS, J. G.; ZAMPINI, M. L. (Ed.). Phonology and Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins, 2008. p. 117-148.
  • HANCIN-BHATT, B.; BHATT, R. Optimal L2 syllables – interactions of transfer and developmental effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, v. 19, p. 331-378, 1998.
  • KAGER, R. Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  • MAJOR, R. Foreign accent: The ontogeny and phylogeny of second language phonology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001.
  • MATTOSO CÂMARA JR., J. Estrutura da língua portuguesa. 40. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2007 [1970]. MCCARTHY, J. A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • MCCARTHY, J.; PRINCE, A. Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction. Report no. RuCCS-TR-3. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science, 1993.
  • MCCARTHY, J.; PRINCE, A. A. Faithfulness and Reduplicative Identity. In: BECKMAN; WALSH DICKEY; URBANCZYK (Orgs.) Papers in Optimality Theory. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, 1995. p. 249-384.
  • MYERS, S. Regressive voicing assimilation: Production and perception studies. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, v. 40, n. 2. The University of Texas at Austin, p. 163-179, 2010.
  • PATER, J. Minimal violation and phonological development. Language Acquisition, v. 6, p. 201-253, 1997.
  • PRINCE, A; SMOLENSKY, P. Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University, 1993.
  • ROCA, I.; JOHNSON, W. A Course in Phonology. Oxford e Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1999. ESTUDOS LINGUÍSTICOS, São Paulo, 42 (1): p. 72-86, jan-abr 2013 86
  • SANKOFF, G.; TAGLIAMONTE, S.; SMITH, E. Goldvarb X: A variable rule application for Macintosh and Windows. Toronto, CA: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto, 2005. Disponível em . Acesso em: 10 out. 2011.
  • SMOLENSKY, P. The initial state and ‘richness of the base’ in Optimality Theory. Technical Report JHU-CogSci-96-4. Baltimore: Cognitive Science Department, Johns Hopkins University, MD, 1996.
  • SMITH, C. The devoicing of /z/ in American English: effects of local and prosodic context. Journal of Phonetics, v. 25, p. 471-500, 1997.
  • TESAR; SMOLENSKY. Learnability in Optimality Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.
  • WELLS, C. Accents of English 2: The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.