Dificultad para medir el modo, tiempo y distancia de desplazamiento en niños a actividades extraescolaresvalidación cuestionario DESACEX

  1. Pedro Antonio Sánchez Miguel 1
  2. Josué Prieto Prieto 2
  3. David Cerro Herrero 1
  4. Mikel Vaquero Solis 1
  5. Miguel Ángel Tapia Serrano 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Extremadura
    info

    Universidad de Extremadura

    Badajoz, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0174shg90

  2. 2 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Journal:
Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación

ISSN: 1579-1726 1988-2041

Year of publication: 2021

Issue: 39

Pages: 598-603

Type: Article

DOI: 10.47197/RETOS.V0I39.79543 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación

Abstract

Active commuting is an opportunity to increase the amount of physical activity, which is why it is necessary tofind new times and routines commuting in which it is interesting to intervene to increase the levels of active commuting and as aconsequence, of daily physical activity. The extracurricular activities are in clear growth since the parents consider that they are afundamental element in the formation of their sons and daughters, for that reason they suppose a great number of urban displacementsand in this way they become a possibility to foment the active displacement. In this sense it is necessary before intervening to analyzethe habits of displacement, to be able to design appropriate interventions in the future. There are no validated instruments and therefore,in the present investigation a questionnaire that serves as a tool for future research is validated. Methodology: The sample consisted of125 students from the 5th and 6h degree of Primary Education (67 boys and 58 girls), as an instrument for data collection, an adaptationof the PACO questionnaire was used for extracurricular activities. Results: the majority of the trips to extracurricular activities/lessonsin the study were by car (60.3% to the extracurricular activities and 59.5% to return home). The results showed moderate reliability interms of travel mode (K = .62, in the outbound and K =.50, in the return) and in terms of the time it takes to arrive (k = 0.59) andacceptable level in the distance to extracurricular students (K = .34). Discussion: The level of reliability of the proposed questionnaireis moderate and therefore, it might be used as a measuring instrument of the different types of commuting, adult accompaniment andnumber of weekly trips. Low values of reliability have been found in the questions about distance to the extracurricular activities schooland in the time it takes to arrive. It is necessary to design new tools to measure these variables.Keywords: active transport, extracurricular activities, physical activity, students.

Bibliographic References

  • Allison, K. R., Dwyer, J. J. & Makin, S. (1999). Perceivedbarriers to physical activity among high school students.Preventive medicine, 28(6), 608-615. DOI:10.1006/pmed.1999.0489
  • Andrés, M. L., Juric, L. C. & Coni, A. G. (2010). Concienciasintáctica en niños de 5 a 8 años de edad: Diseño de uninstrumento y evaluación de sus propiedadespsicométricas. Avaliação Psicológica, 9(2), 199-210.
  • Badland, H., & Schofield, G. (2008) Health Associations withTransport-R lated Physical Activity and Motorized Travelto Destinations. International Journal of SustainableTransportation, 2:2, 77-90, DOI: 10.1080/15568310601113645
  • Bahamonde, C., Carmona, C., Albornoz, J., Hernández-Garcia,R. & Torres-Luque, G. (2018). Efecto de un programa deactividades deportivas extraescolares en jóvenes chile-nos (Effect of an extracurricular sport activity programon young Chileans). Retos, (35), 261-266. DOI:10.47197/retos. v0i35.62834
  • Berrigan, D., Troiano, R. P., McNeel, T., DiSogra, C. & Ballard-Barbash, R. (2006). Active transportation increasesadherence to activity recommendations. Americanjournal of preventive medicine, 31(3), 210-216. DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2006.04.007
  • Buliung, R. N., Larsen, K., Faulkner, G. E. & Stone, M. R.(2013). The «path» not taken: exploring structuraldifferences in mapped-versus shortest-network-pathschool travel routes. American journal of public health,103(9), 1589-1596. DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2012.301172
  • Burke, M. & Brown, A. L. (2007). Distances people walk fortransport. Road & Transport Research: A Journal ofAustralian and New Zealand Research and Practice,16(3), 16.
  • Cladellas, R., Clariana, M., Badia, M. & Gotzens, C. (2013).Actividades extraescolares y rendimiento académico enalumnos de primaria. European Journal of Investigationin Health, Psychology and Education, 3(2), 87-97.
  • Chillón, P., Ortega, F. B., Ruiz, J. R., Veidebaum, T., Oja, L.,Mäestu, J. & Sjöström, M. (2010). Active commuting toschool in children and adolescents: an opportunity toincrease physical activity and fitness. Scandinavianjournal of public health, 38(8), 873-879.DOI:.
  • Chillón, P., Evenson, K. R., Vaughn, A. & Ward, D. S. (2011).A systematic review of interventions for promoting acti-ve transportation to school. International journal ofbehavioral nutrition and physical activity, 8(1), 10. /DOI: /10.1186/1479-5868-8-10
  • Chillón, P., Herrador, M., Migueles, J. H., Cabanas, V.,Fernández-, J. R., Veiga, Ó. L. & Castro-Piñero, J. (2017).Convergent validation of a questionnaire to assess themode and frequency of commuting to and from school.Scandinavian journal of public health, 45(6), 612-620.DOI: 10.1177/1403494817718905
  • Duncan, M. J. & Mummery, W. K. (2007). GIS or GPS? Acomparison of two methods for assessing route takenduring active transport. American journal of preventivemedicine, 33(1), 51-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.042
  • Duncan, M. J., Mummery, W. K. & Dascombe, B. J. (2007).Utility of global positioning system to measure activetransport in urban areas. Medicine and Science in Sportsand Exercise, 39(10), 1851-1857
  • Escobar, D., Rodriguez, F., Villa, E., Esteban, I. & Chillón, P.(2019). Fiabilidad y viabilidad de un cuestionarioautorreportado sobre el modo, tiempo y distancia de des-plazamiento en niños y adolescentes (Reliability andfeasibility of a self-reported questionnaire on the mode,time and distance of commuting in children an. Retos,37(37), 379-385
  • Garcia, M. P., Gutierrez, S. H., Ruíz, J. R. & Garzón, P. C. (2017).Fiabilidad de un cuestionario de barreras del desplaza-miento activo al colegio. Retos: nuevas tendencias eneducación física, deporte y recreación, (32), 72-75.
  • Gelabert-Carulla, J., Muntaner-Mas, A. & Palou-Sampol, P.(2019). Influencia del desplazamiento activo al colegiosobre la composición corporal y el rendimiento académi-co en escolares de 10-12 años (Influence of activecommuting to school on body composition and academicachievement in schoolchildren aged 10-12 years). Retos,36(36), 376-383. DOI:10.47197/retos. v36i36.68166
  • Guthold, R., Stevens, G., Riley, L. & Bull, F. (2019) Globaltrends in insufficient physical activity amongadolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-basedsurveys with 1·6 million participants. The Lancet Child& Adolescents Health, November 21, 2019. DOI:10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2
  • Hermoso, Y. & Chinchilla, J. L. (2010). La participación enactividades extraescolares de jóvenes y adolescentes yel nivel satisfacción en la ocupación de su tiempo libre.International Journal of Developmental andEducational Psychology, 2(1).
  • Hidalgo, R.F. (2005). «El impacto de las actividadesextraescolares en ciencia y tecnología». En A. Martín, I.Trelles y G. Zamarrón (Eds.), Universidad y Comunica-ción social de la ciencia (pp. 177-197). Granada: Edito-rial Universidad de Granada.
  • Noam, G. G., Biancarosa, G. & Dechausay, N. (2002).Afterschool education: Approaches to an emerging field.Harvard Education Press.
  • Niñerola, J., Capdevila, L. & Pintanel, M. (2007). Barreras percibidas y actividad física: el autoinforme de barreras para práctica de ejercicio físico. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 15(1)
  • Panter, J. R., Jones, A. P., Van Sluijs, E. M. & Griffin, S. J.(2010). Neighborhood, route, and school environmentsand children’s active commuting. American journal ofpreventive medicine, 38(3), 268-278. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.040
  • Profith (2016). Pedalea y anda al cole. Disponible en: http://profith.ugr.es/
  • Rojas-Rueda D, de Nazelle A, Andersen ZJ, Braun-FahrländerC, Bruha J, Bruhova-Foltynova H, et al. (2016) HealthImpacts of Active Transportation in Europe. PLoS ONE11(3): e0149990. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0149990
  • Schantz, P. & Stigell, E. (2009). A criterion method formeasuring route distance in physically active commuting.Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 41(2), 472-478.
  • Silva, K. S., Vasques, D. G., Martins, C. D. O., Williams, L. A.& Lopes, A. S. (2011). Active commuting: prevalence,barriers, and associated variables. Journal of PhysicalActivity and Health, 8(6), 750-757. DOI:10.1123/jpah.8.6.750
  • Timperio, A., Ball, K., Salmon, J., Roberts, R., Giles-Corti, B.,Simmons, D., ... & Crawford, D. (2006). Personal, family,social, and environmental correlates of active commutingto school. American journal of preventive medicine,30(1), 45-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.08.047
  • Villa, E. (2011). Factores personales y ambientales asociadoscon el desplazamiento activo al colegio de los escolaresespañoles. (Proyecto fin de Máster). Universidad de Gra-nada, España.
  • Villa, E., Rodríguez, C., Barranco, Y., Cabezas, L.F. & Chillón,P. (2016). Evaluación de la concordancia de dos métodospara determinar la distancia del desplazamiento activo alcolegio en escolares. Nutricion hospitalaria, 33(3), 713-71. DOI:10.20960/nh.283
  • Villa-Gonzalez, E., Barranco-Ruiz, Y., Evenson, K. R. & Chi-llón, P. (2018). Systematic review of interventions forpromoting active school transport. Preventive medici-ne, 111, 115-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.02.010
  • Núñez, N. L. (2018). La danza como actividad extraescolar en el alumnado de educación primaria. Sinfonía Virtual: Re-vista de Música Clásica y Reflexión Musical, (35), 5.