Posthuman Worldbuilding in Nalo Hopkinson’s Midnight Robberan Exploration of the Techno/ Natural Divide

  1. Lidia María Cuadrado Payeras 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Revista:
Hélice

ISSN: 1887-2905

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 7

Número: 1

Páginas: 52-64

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Hélice

Resumen

This article draws heavily on Francesca Ferrando’s Philosophical Posthumanism (2019) to analyse the ways in which the contrast between ‘techno-driven’ and ‘nature-driven’ civilisations in Nalo Hopkinson’s Midnight Robber (2000), while initially seemingly portrayed in accordance with roughly canonical science fiction tropes, can be made to show the tension at the perceived fracture between technology and nature (and, in a parallel fashion, discourses of progress and backwardness) that has been a staple of classic science-fiction writing. A posthuman critical perspective on Hopkinson’s worldbuilding, with its blend of mythology, fantasy and science fiction, serves to provide a new outlook on sf as a literary genre. Hopkinson’s novel also serves to illustrate how a posthuman discourse on these themes (nature, culture, mythology and science), through the application of Haraway’s ‘naturecultures’ (2003) and the turn towards non-Western epistemologies, provides much-needed nuances to explore these topics in relation to postcolonial speculative fictions.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AGAMBEN, Giorgio (1998). homo sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Translated by Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford UP.
  • BARR, Marlene S., eds. (2008). Afro-Future Females: Black Writers Chart Science Fiction’s Newest New-Wave Trajectory. Columbus: The Ohio State University P.
  • BENTHAM, Jeremy (1995). The Panopticon Writings. With an introduction by Miran Božovič. London and Brooklyn: Verso.
  • BRAIDOTTI, Rosi (2002). Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Cambridge and Malden: Polity P.
  • DERY, Mark (1994). “Black to the Future: Interviews with Samuel R. Delany, Greg Tate, and Tricia Rose”, Mark Dery (ed.), Flame Wars: The Discourse of Cyberculture. Durham and London: Duke UP, 179-222.
  • DELEUZE, Gilles (1990). Pourparlers: 1972- 1990. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
  • DILLON, Grace L. (2007). “Scientific Literacies in Nalo Hopkinson’s Ceremonial Worlds”, Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts, 18.1, 23-41.
  • ENTEEN, Jillana (2007). “‘On the Receiving end of the Colonization’: Nalo Hopkinson’s ‘Nansi Web”, Science Fiction Studies, 34.2, 262-282.
  • FAUCHEUX, Amandine H. (2017). “Race and Sexuality in Nalo Hopkinson’s Oeuvre; or, Queer Afrofuturism”, Science Fiction Studies, 33.1: 563-580.
  • FEHSKENS, Erin M. (2010). “The Matter of Bodies: Materiality on Nalo Hopkinson’s Cybernetic Planet”, The Global South, 4.2, 136-156.
  • FERRANDO, Francesca (2019). Philosophical Posthumanism. London and New York: Routledge.
  • FOUCAULT, Michel (1988). “Technologies of the Self”, Luther H. Martin, Huck Gutman & Patrick H. Hutton (eds.), Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault. Massachusetts: The University of Massachusetts Press, 16-49.
  • FOUCAULT, Michel (1995). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books. HARAWAY, Donna (2003). The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
  • FOUCAULT, Michel (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge. HOPKINSON, Nalo (2000a). “A Conversation with Nalo Hopkinson”. http://www.sfsite.com/03b/nh77.htm (Access 31 January 2021).
  • FOUCAULT, Michel (2000b). Midnight Robber. New York: Grand Central Publishing. LILLVIS, Kristen (2017). Posthuman Blackness and the Black Female Imagination. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.
  • MATHURIN MAIR, Lucille (2006). A Historical Study of Women in Jamaica, 1655-1844. Jamaica, Barbados and Trinidad and Tobago: University of the West Indies Press.
  • MARTÍN-LUCAS, Belén (2017). “Posthumanist Feminism and Interspecies Affect in Nalo Hopkinson’s Midnight Robber”, Atlantis 38.2, 105-115.
  • MBEMBE, Achille (2003). “Necropolitics”, Libby Meintjes (trad.), Public Culture 15.1, 11-40.
  • RUTLEDGE, Gregory E. (2001). “Futurist Fiction & Fantasy: The Racial Establishment”, Callaloo, 24.1, 236-252.
  • SFWA (1 December 2020). “Nalo Hopkinson Named the 37th SFWA Damon Knight Grand Master”, SFWA: Science Fiction & Fantasy Writers of America. https://www. sfwa.org/2020/12/01/nalo-hopkinson-namedthe-37th-sfwa-damon-knight-grandmaster.
  • THOMAS, Sheree R. (2020). “Dangerous Muses: Black Women Writers Creating at the Forefront of Afrofuturism”, Isiah Lavender III and Lisa Yaszek (eds.), Literary Afrofuturism in the Twenty-First Century. Kindle ed., Columbus: The Ohio State UP.
  • SHAWL, Nisi (2018). “A Crash Course in the History of Black Science Fiction”, Nisi Shawl. http://www.nisishawl.com/CCHBSF. html
  • SORENSEN, Leif (2014). “Dubwise into the Future: Versioning Modernity in Nalo Hopkinson”, African American Review, 47.2- 3, 267-283.
  • SPILLERS, Hortense J. (2008). “Imaginative Encounters”, Afro-Future Females: Black Writers Chart Science Fiction’s Newest NewWave Trajectory, Marlene S. Barr (ed.). Columbus: The Ohio State University P.
  • VINGE, Vernor (1993). “The Coming Technological Singularity: How to Survive in the Post-Human Era”, Vision 21: Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in the Era of Cyberspace: Proceedings of a Symposium Cosponsoder by the NASA Lewis Research Center and the Ohio Aerospace Institute, Westlake, Ohio, March 30-31. Cleveland and Brook Park: NASA, 11-22.
  • ZUBOFF, Shoshana (1995). In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. New York: Basic Books.
  • ZUBOFF, Shoshana (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet