El cumplimento de los ODS y sus efectos en la rentabilidad económica en la empresa cotizada española

  1. Emma García-Meca 1
  2. Jennifer Martínez-Ferrero 2
  3. Juan Pedro Sánchez-Ballesta 3
  1. 1 Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena

    Cartagena, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02k5kx966

  2. 2 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

  3. 3 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Journal:
Revista de Contabilidad y Tributación. CEF

ISSN: 2695-6896 2792-8306

Year of publication: 2021

Issue: 464

Type: Article

More publications in: Revista de Contabilidad y Tributación. CEF

Abstract

This paper presents a triple objective for a sample of listed Spanish companies. In the first place, this study aims to understand the implication of Spanish companies in the monitoring of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Second, to know the main characteristics of the companies that follow a greater compliance with them. Finally, the study also examines the association between the disclosure of the SDGs in sustainability reports and the profitability of the Spanish company, exploring whether the companies involved in the presentation of SDG reports create greater value through greater transparency and commitment to society. Using a sample of Spanish listed companies for the period 2015-2017, made up of 318 observations, the results show that companies belonging to regulated sectors with high social impact, larger and with a better financial situation, are those that show greater concern about the disclosure of information on monitoring the SDGs. Our results show that this SDG disclosure by large listed Spanish companies does not have an immediate effect on short-term business profitability term.

Bibliographic References

  • Allen C.; Metternicht, G. y Wiedmann, T. (2018). Initial progress in implementing the sustainable development goals (SDGs)—a review of evidence from countries. Sustainability Science, 13, 1.453-1.467.
  • Branco, M.C. y Rodrigues, L.L. (2006). Communication of corporate social responsibility by Portuguese banks: a legitimacy theory perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(3), 232-248.
  • Convención Marco de Naciones Unidas sobre Cambio Climático. (2018). Poland.
  • Desender, K.; López Puertas-Lamy, M.; Pattitoni, P. y Petracci, B. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and cost of financing. The importance of the international corporate governance system. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 28, 207-234.
  • Dyllick, T. y Muff, K. (2015). Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: introducing a typology from business-as-usual to true business sustainability. Organ. Environ., 29(2), 156-174.
  • García-Meca, E. y Martínez-Ferrero (2021). Is SDG reporting substantial or symbolic? An examination of controversial and environmentally sensitive industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298.
  • Gray, R.; Owen, D. y Adams, C. (1996). Accounting and Accountability, Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting. Prentice-Hall.
  • Informe Red Española Pacto Mundial. (2019). Las empresas españolas ante la Agenda 2030. Jo, H. y Na H. (2012). Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 441-456.
  • Liao, L.; Luo, L. y Tang, Q. (2014). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47, 409-424.
  • Martínez Ferrero, J. y García-Meca, E. (2020). Internal corporate governance strength as a mechanism for achieving SDGs. Sustainable Development, 28, 1.189-1.198.
  • Michelon, G.; Rodrigue, M. y Trevisan, E. (2020). The marketization of a social movement: Activists, shareholders and CSR disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 80.
  • Muhmad S. N. y Muhamad, R. (2020). Sustainable Business Practices and Financial Performance During pre-and Post-SDG Adoption Periods: a Systematic Review. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 1-19.
  • Petersen, M.A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435-480.
  • Pizzi, S.; Rosatti, F. y Venturelli, A. (2021). The determinants of the business contribution to the 2030 Agenda. Business Strategy and Environment, 30, 404-421.
  • PWC. (2019). Creating a strategy for a better world. <https://www.pwc.es/es/publicaciones/sostenibilidad/pwc-sdg-Challenge2019-spain.pdf>.
  • Ramón-Llorens, C.; García-Meca, E. y Pucheta, C. (2020). The role of human and social capital in driving CSR reporting. Long Range Planning, 52.
  • Rosati, F. y Faria, L.G. (2019). Addressing the SDGs in sustainability reports: The relationship with institutional factors. Journal of cleaner production, 215, 1.312-1.326.
  • Schmalzbauer, B. y Visbeck, M. (2016). The contribution of science in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. German Committee Future Earth, Stuttgart/Kiel.
  • Van der Waal, J. y Thijsseens, T. (2020) Corporate involvement in Sustainable Development Goals: Exploring the territory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252.
  • Bebbington, J. y Unerman, J. (2018). Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: An enabling role for accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(1), 2-24.