Triaje por enfermería en el ictus agudo

  1. Rodríguez Vico, Araceli 1
  2. Sánchez Hernández, Fernando 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Salamanca. España
Journal:
Enfermería global: revista electrónica trimestral de enfermería

ISSN: 1695-6141

Year of publication: 2021

Issue Title: #64 Octubre

Volume: 20

Issue: 4

Pages: 108-130

Type: Article

DOI: 10.6018/EGLOBAL.465261 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

More publications in: Enfermería global: revista electrónica trimestral de enfermería

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

In recent decades, the role of nursing in triage and screening of patients in emergency services, both in prehospital environment and especially in hospitals, is essential and indisputable. In order to analyze the triage carried out by nursing to detect patients with acute stroke, and if necessary improve it, a retrospective study was carried out of the cardinal presentations of stroke, the scale of the National Institute of Health of the United States, and the modified Rankin scale, applied in the nursing triage set at the Salamanca University Hospital, during the period between 2016 and 2019, both inclusive. The total number of clinical records analyzed was 1572. The analysis is focused on the reliability, evaluated by nursing, of the cardinal presentations of acute stroke, and of the two scales, compared to the traditional rapid algorithms for stroke detection, in particular the FAST method, and the Cincinnati scale. Our study shows that there are several clinical presentations that escape the rapid scales, so it is essential to expand the triage methods of acute stroke carried out by nursing, in order to avoid delays in detection and definitive treatment (time-dependent disease). Thus, the expanded identification of cardinal presentations, together with the use of more detailed scales applied by trained nurses, appear to be very useful tools for the detection of acute stroke.

Bibliographic References

  • Wolf LA, Delao AM, Perhats C, Moon MD, Zavotsky KE. Triaging the Emergency Department, Not the Patient: United States Emergency Nurses’ Experience of the Triage Process. J Emerg Nurs. 2018; 44(3): 258-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2017.06.010.
  • Bazyar J, Farrokhi M, Salari A, Khankeh HR. The principles of triage in emergencies and disasters: a systematic review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2020; 35(3): 305-313. DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X20000291.
  • P. Funderburke, P. Exploring best practice for triage. J Emerg Nurs. 2008; 34(2): 180-182. DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2007.11.013.
  • Haghigh S, Ashrafizadeh H, Mojaddami F, Kord B. A survey on knowledge level of the nurses about hospital Triage. J Nurs Educ. 2017; 5 (6): 46‑52. DOI: 10.21859/jne-05067.
  • Magnusson C, Herlitz J, Axelsson C. Affiliations expand Pre-hospital triage performance and emergency medical services nurse's field assessment in an unselected patient population attended to by the emergency medical services: a prospective observational study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020; 28(1): 81. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-020-00766-1.
  • Reisi Z, Saberipour B, Adienh M, Hemmatipour A, Shahvali E.A. The level of awareness of the emergency department nurses of the triage principles in teaching hospitals. J of Nurs Mid Sci. 2018; 5 (1): 32-37. DOI: 10.4103/JNMS.JNMS_5_18
  • William J. Powers, Alejandro A. Rabinstein, Teri Ackerson, Opeolu M. Adeoye, Nicholas C. Bambakidis, Kyra Becker, José Biller, Michael Brown, Bart M. Demaerschalk, Brian Hoh, Edward C. Jauch, Chelsea S. Kidwell, Thabele M. Leslie-Mazwi, Bruce Ovbiagele, Phillip A. Scott, Kevin N. Sheth, Andrew M. Southerland, Deborah V. Summers, and David L. Tirschwell and on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018; 49: e46–e99. DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158.
  • Ekundayo OJ, Saver JL, Fonarow GC, Schwamm LH, Xian Y, Zhao X, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Cheng EM. Patterns of emergency medical services use and its association with timely stroke treatment: findings from Get With The Guidelines–Stroke. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013; 6: 262–269. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000089.
  • BE-FAST (Balance, Eyes, Face, Arm, Speech, Time) Reducing the Proportion of Strokes Missed Using the FAST Mnemonic Aroor SS, Singh R, Goldstein LB, Stroke. 2017; 48: 479-481. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015169.
  • Rudd M, Buck D, Ford GA, Price CI. A systematic review of stroke recognition instruments in hospital and prehospital settings. Emerg Med J, 2016; 33(11): 818-822. DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2015-205197.
  • Schlemm E, Ebinger M, Nolte CH, Endres M, Schlemm L. Optimal transport destination for ischemic stroke patients with unknown vessel status: use of prehospital triage scores. Stroke. 2017; 48: 2184–2191. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017281.
  • Venema E, Lingsma HF, Chalos V, Mulder M, Lahr MMH, van der Lugt A, van Es A, Steyerberg EW, Hunink MGM, Dippel DWJ, Rozemberg B. Personalized prehospital triage in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2019; 50: 313–320. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022562.
  • Williams LS, Yilmaz EY, Lopez-Yunez AM. Retrospective Assessment of Initial Stroke Severity with the NIH Stroke Scale Stroke. 2000; 31: 858–862. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.31.4.858
  • Banks JL, and Marotta CA. Outcomes Validity and Reliability of the Modified Rankin Scale: Implications for Stroke Clinical Trials A Literature Review and Synthesis. Stroke. 2007; 38: 1091–1096. DOI/10.1161/01.STR.0000258355.23810.c6.
  • Stanfield LM. Clinical decision making in triage: an integrative review. J Emerg Nurs. 2015; 41(5): 396–403. DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2015.02.003.
  • Delmas, P, Fiorentino A, Antonini M, Vuilleumier S, Stotzer G, Kollbrunner A, Jaccard D, Hulas J, Rutschmann O, Simon J, Hugli O, Keranflec’h CG, Pasquier J. Effects of environmental distractors on nurse emergency triage accuracy: a pilot study protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 6: 171. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-020-00717-8
  • Chen SS, Chen JC, Ng CJ, Chen PL, Lee PH, Chang WY. Factors that influence the accuracy of triage nurses' judgement in emergency departments. Emerg Med J. 2010; 27(6): 451–455. DOI: 10.1136/emj.2008.059311.
  • Mistry B, Stewart De Ramirez S, Kelen G, PSK S, Balhara KS, Levin S, et al. Accuracy and Reliability of Emergency Department Triage Using the Emergency Severity Index: An International Multicenter Assessment. Ann Emerg Med. 2018; 71(5): 581–7.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.036.
  • Martin A, Davidson CL, Panik A, Buckenmyer C, Delpais P, Ortiz M. An examination of ESI triage scoring accuracy in relationship to ED nursing attitudes and experience. J Emerg Nurs. 2014; 40(5): 461–468. DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2013.09.009.
  • Smith EE, Kent DM, Bulsara KR, Leung LY, Lichtman JH, Reeves MJ, Towfighi A, Whiteley WN, Zahuranec D. Accuracy of prediction instruments for diagnosing large vessel occlusion in individuals with suspected stroke: a systematic review for the 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018; 49: e111–e122. DOI: 10.1161/STR. 0000000000000160.
  • Berglund A, Svensson L, Wahlgren N, von Euler M; HASTA Collaborators. Face Arm Speech Time Test use in the prehospital setting, better in the ambulance than in the emergency medical communication center. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014; 37: 212–216. DOI: 10.1159/000358116.
  • Sánchez F, Ballesteros, JC, Kraiem MS, Sánchez M, Moreno MN. “Predictive Modeling of ICU Healthcare-Associated Infections from Imbalanced Data. Using Ensembles and a Clustering-Based Undersampling Approach”, Appl. Sci. 2019; 9: 5287. DOI: 10.3390/app9245287
  • González, J., Martín, F., Sánchez, M., Sánchez, F. and Moreno M.N. “Multiclassifier systems for predicting neurological outcome of patients with severe trauma and polytrauma in intensive care units”. J Med Syst. 2017; 41:136, DOI: 10.1007/s10916-017-0789-1.
  • Reay G, MacDonald LS, Then KL, Hall M, Rankin JA. Triage emergency nurse decision-making: Incidental findings from a focus group study. Int Emerg. 2020; 48: 100791. DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2019.100791.
  • Levin S, Toerper M, Hamrock E, Hinson JS, Barnes S, Gardner H, et al. Machine-Learning-Based Electronic triage more accurately differentiates patients with respect to clinical outcomes compared with the emergency severity index. An Emerg Med. 2018; 71(5): 565–74.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.08.005.
  • Brosinski CM, Riddell AJ, Valdez S. Improving triage accuracy: a staff development approach. Clin Nurse Spec. 2017; 31(3): 145–148. DOI: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000291.
  • Martin A, Davidson CL, Panik A, Buckenmyer C, Delpais P, Ortiz M. An examination of ESI triage scoring accuracy in relationship to ED nursing attitudes and experience. J Emerg Nurs. 2014; 40(5): 461–468. DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2013.09.009.
Data source: Dialnet