Los disjuntos en las construcciones nominalizadas de evento en latín

  1. Garzón Fontalvo, Eveling 1
  1. 1 Departamento de Filología Clásica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Journal:
Cuadernos de filología clásica: Estudios latinos

ISSN: 1131-9062

Year of publication: 2020

Volume: 40

Issue: 1

Pages: 11-24

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5209/CFCL.71529 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Cuadernos de filología clásica: Estudios latinos

Abstract

In Latin, the verbal nouns that refer to the activity or state described by their base verbs can give rise to event nominalisation constructions. These constructions are not only capable of reflecting both arguments and adjuncts of their respective underlying verbal predications (§ 1), but also document elements that provide relevant information for the act of communication itself and can be therefore identified as disjuncts or meta-communicative expressions (§ 2). In this vein, the purpose of this article is twofold. On the one hand, it seeks to describe what kind of semantic contents are expressed by the disjuncts within the nominalised constructions (§ 3). On the other, it questions whether these elements suffer restrictions in their transformation from verbal predications to nominal structures and, as the case may be, it aims to offer an explanation of these limitations (§ 4).  

Bibliographic References

  • Alexiadou, A. (2001), Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalization and Ergativity, Ámsterdam/Filadelfia, John Benjamins.
  • Baños, J. M. et al. (2003) (eds.), Praedicativa I. Complementación en griego y latín, Santiago de Compostela, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
  • Baños, J. M. (2009a), «Dativo», en Baños, J. M. (coord.), Sintaxis del latín clásico, Madrid, Liceus, 185-209.
  • Baños, J. M. (2009b) (coord), Sintaxis del latín clásico, Madrid, Liceus.
  • Benveniste, E. (19752 [1984]), Noms d’agent et noms d’action en indo-européen, París, Librairie d’Amérique et d’Orient.
  • Bisetto, A. & Melloni, C. (2007), «Result nominals: A lexical-Semantic Investigation», en Booij, G. et al. (eds.), On-Line Proceedings of the Fifth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM5), Boloña, Università degli Studi di Bologna, 393-412.
  • Boegel, T. (1902), De nomine verbali latino quaestiones grammaticae, Leipzig, Typis B. G. Teubneri.
  • Bos, G. F. (1967), «L’adverbe en latin. Tentative de classification structurale», BSL 62, 106-122.
  • Comrie, B. & Thompson, S. (20072 [1985]), «Lexical Nominalization», en Shopen, T. (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 334-381.
  • Dik, S. (19972a [1989]), The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: The Structure of the Clause, Berlín/Nueva York, Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Dik, S. (19972b [1989]). The theory of Functional Grammar. Part 2: Complex and derived constructions, Berlín/Nueva York, Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Garzón, E. (2018), Nombres de Acción y otros derivados deverbativos en latín, Madrid, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Tesis doctoral).
  • Givón, T. (2001), Syntax. An Introduction. Vol. 2, Ámsterdam/Filadelfia, John Benjamins.
  • Grimshaw, J. (1990), Argument structure, Londres, MIT.
  • Gross, G. (1996), «Prédicats nominaux et compatibilité aspectuelle», Langages 121, 54-57.
  • Haspelmath, M. (2001), «Word Classes and Parts of Speech», en Smelser, N. & Baltes, P. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Oxford, Pergamon, 16538-16545.
  • Hopper, P. & Thompson, S. (1985), «The iconicity of the universal categories ‘noun’ and ‘verb’», en Haiman, J. (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, Ámsterdam/Filadelfia, John Benjamins, 151-183.
  • Hout, A. van (1991), «Deverbal Nominalization, Object versus Event Denoting Nominals, Implications for Argument & Event Structure», Linguistics in the Netherlands 8, 71-80.
  • Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (2012), Nominalizations, Londres/Nueva York, Routledge.
  • Kühner, R. & Stegmann, C. (1912-1914), Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache, Hannover, Hahnsche Buchhandlung.
  • Lehmann, C. (1988), «Towards a typology of clause linkage», en Haiman, J. & Thompson, A. (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, Ámsterdam/Filadelfia, John Benjamins, 181-225.
  • Lyons, J. (1977), Semantics. Vol. 2, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Mackenzie, J. L. (1985), «Nominalization and valency reduction», en Bolkestein, M. et al. (eds.), Predicates and Terms in Functional Grammar, Dordrecht/Cinnaminson, Foris, 29-47.
  • Maurel, J. P. (1982), «Datifs libres et datifs liés en latin», Cahiers de Grammaire 4, 59-91.
  • Picallo, C. (1991), «Nominals and nominalization in Catalan», Probus 3 (3), 279–316.
  • Picallo, C. (1999), «La estructura del sintagma nominal: las nominalizaciones y otros sustantivos con complementos argumentales», en Bosque, I. & Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Madrid, Espasa, 363-394.
  • Pinkster, H. (1984), Latijnse syntaxis en semantiek, Ámsterdam, B. R. Grüner Publishing.
  • Pinkster, H. (2004), «Attitudinal and illocutionary satellites in Latin», en Aertsen, H., Hannay, M. & Lyall, R. (eds.), Words in their places. A Festschrift for J. Lachlan Mackenzie, Ámsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 191-198.
  • Pinkster, H. (2015), The Oxford Latin Syntax. Vol. 1. The Simple clause, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Pinkster, H. (2021), The Oxford Latin Syntax. Vol 2. The Complex Sentence and Discourse, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Pultrová, L. (2011), The Latin Deverbative Nouns and Adjectives, Praga, Charles University in Prague, Karolinum Press.
  • Rosén, H. (1981), Studies in the Syntax of the Verbal Noun in Early Latin, Múnich, Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
  • Rosén, H. (1983), «The Mechanisms of Latin Nominalization and Conceptualization in Historical View», en Haase, W. & Temporini, H. (eds.), Aufstieg Und Niedergang Der Römischen Welt, Berlín/Nueva York, De Gruyter, 178-211.
  • Serbat, G. (1996), Grammaire fondamentale du latin VI. L’emploi des cas en latin. Vol. I: Nominatif, Vocatif, Accusatif, Génitif, Datif, Lovaina/París, Peeters.
  • Sleeman, P. & Brito, A.M. (2010a), «Nominalization, event, aspect and argument structure: A syntactic approach», en Duguine, M., Huidobro, S. & Madariaga, N. (eds.), Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Ámsterdam/Filadelfia, John Benjamins, 113-129.
  • Sleeman, P. & Brito, A. M. (2010b), «Aspect and argument structure of deverbal nominalizations: a split vP analysis», en Alexiadou, A. & Rathert, M. (eds.), The Syntax of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks, Berlín/Nueva York, De Gruyter Mouton, 199-217.
  • Spevak, O. (2014), The Noun Phrase in Classical Latin Prose, Leiden/Boston, Brill.
  • Spevak, O. (2015), «Les noms verbaux en latin», BSL CX (1), 289-321.
  • Tarriño, E. (2009), «Adverbios y partículas», en Baños, J.M. (coord.), Sintaxis del latín clásico, Madrid, Liceus, 349-374.
  • Torrego, E. (1998) (ed.), Nombres y funciones. Estudios de sintaxis griega y latina, Madrid, Ediciones Clásicas-UAM.
  • Torrego, E. et al. (2007) (eds.), Praedicativa II. Esquemas de complementación verbal en griego antiguo y en latín, Zaragoza, Universidad de Zaragoza.
  • Villa, J. de la (2006), «Adverbs as a part of speech in Ancient Greek», en Crespo, E. et al. (eds.), Word Classes and Related Topics in Ancient Greek, Lovaina, Peeters, 405-439.
Data source: Dialnet